Comments by "Zrips" (@Zripas) on "Johnny Harris"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Texeira Correa
"centrifugal force is always accelerating, its constant acceleration"
? how is this relevant exactly? Centrifugal force created by earths rotation is something like 0.4% So why does it mater exactly?
" it’s in a container and magnets keep the plasma in place or you wouldn’t have that CHAMBER"
Right, just like gravity keeps atmosphere in place... you dint realized that? Don't you now? You have pretty much 1 to 1 comparison here: Plasma in vacuum held by a force in place with atmosphere on earth if held by gravity in place.
"and we’re not talking about plasma being held by magnets above the earth"
i know, but you asked about gas being surrounded by vacuum, yet you failed to understand that vacuum doesn't suck.
" then why is it that the vacuum of “space” doesn’t equalize the “atmosphere” into an equilibrium ?"
gravity?.
"Your saying there is no loss at all?"
there is, tiny portion, due to cosmic winds or something like that, i'm not really familiar with that particular topic, but there is tiny loss of atmosphere.
"If you look it up NASA"
DON'T CARE!
Why do you people think that bringing up NASA would prove/disprove anything? They are irrelevant!
"Lastly I’m just saying it’s more of a claim that you “know” where moving and you don’t feel centrifugal force at all"
And we dont, once again, you cant feel motion, this is FACT, then you have this "ENORMOUS" centrifugal force which is 0.4% of gravity... Tho funny enough you can even test that by weighting something on pole and on equator, it will be lighter on equator.
" I don’t have to prove anything to a keyboard warrior"
Then why the hell do you even made original comment? If you are not interested in defending your ridiculous claim, then why you even started it? i asked for simple proof, one flipping image from your magical 50k collection, yet you failed multiple times to provide it. Which only proves that you dont have any actual evidence, you simply came here to get some attention from people, nothing more.
"I didn’t come here to talk to Zrips unless your the creator of the vid in that case let’s talk, otherwise we can banter."
Its public forum, you make comment on a public forum... What the hell do you expect to see? its like complaining that people looked at you when you went outside to the street and started to scream that earth is flat while this "conversation" was pointed to some specific individual... Damn...
We both know that you dont have any evidence to present here, because if you did had, you already would have presented it. But you are here tap dancing, trying to disprove globe model, complaining that i'm not the right person and all that nonsense... Grow up...
2
-
Texeira Correa
"plasma ima vacum chamber isn’t held in by gravity it’s electromagnetics"
Correct... Damn... you still failing to understand a point i made... You wanted to claim that gas cant be in vacuum, i provided example where it is because its been held by some force, in this case its electromagnetism, in case of earth we have gravity... Do you still not realize this or what?
"I know vacuums don’t suck"
Then why the hell you said that gas cant be near vacuum if vacuum doesn't suck?
"what I’m saying I just told that earth would lose its atmosphere if it was next to a vacuum without a physical barrier"
GRAVITY?
"hence you telling me it loses its atmosphere lol"
And it does... its not like we loose 5% every year... but it does loose some of it... Whats your problem here exactly?
"We’re do you think it all came from"
are you asking about origins of life on earth? or what?
"if it goes into space sure nuff no atmosphere"
Yea, you have no idea how exactly we loose, dont you now?... And you do realize that we have a way to refill atmosphere? Right? its not like we have defined amount of air...
"It doesn’t make any sense that the large vacuum of space isn’t enough for the air pressure and “gravity” to be equalized"
Why should it? You have GRAVITY which holds atmosphere "stuck" to earth... This prevents from gas equalizing with a vacuum... its basic physics 101 yet i have to explain this to you... Why?
"to be dispersed it quite literally doesn’t even equate to physics"
Riiiight, so every single scientist on the world is wrong because you failed to understand physics?.... Riiiight...
"Look up what happens when open a vacuum chamber what happens?"
Open here? On earth? Where you have huge air pressure? or in space where you have dont have outside pressure and you dont have large enough mass to hold it in place? Its one of those situations where i have to explain people basic physics instead of disproving their claims... Did you skipped school or what?
"SO GIMME PROOF!"
Of what? That earth is spherical? Ok, check out suns behavior, shatters flat earth model (do you even have one?) straight away, not even talking about other 100+ issues. And this is basic observation, no need to understand how vacuum works or believe in gravity, basic understanding of geometry would be enough...
"you need growing up because my message was quite literally put into reference to the author of the video"
if you cant even win argument against some random dude like me, how do you expect to win against some one who made video like this?
"and also can someone explain how I put a screenshot up on YouTube comments for this guy?"
imgur.com decent site where yo can place images for free and get short link to them, no need to create account or log in or anything like that, drag and drop, you get a link, you post it here, as i'm still waiting your BEST image proof that earth is flat...
2
-
Texeira Correa
12 comments in and you still have no examples from your magical 50k image proof you claimed to have? Whats going on? Did you lied about that? Or you realized that all of those pictures you have are not evidence?
"has can’t be near a vacuum because it’s will meet disperse evenly into the vacuum because there is no physical barrier to stop no air pressure to attract a pressurized system"
One more time: Gravity.
"And second when your talking electromagnetism and then jump into gravity which is a farce I just can’t follow you there"
i know that you cant follow me here, this is why you think that earth is flat... Electromagnetism and gravity are both forces, different ones, but still effect matter in similar way. We even managed to counter gravity by applying electromagnetism on a frog...
"I believe there isn’t any gravity"
Who cares? Gravity is real, testable thing from reality. Cavendish experiment demonstrates that quite nicely.
"it doesn’t exist because it doesn’t exist"
Flat earth doesn't exist because it doesn't exist. There you go, used your logic to debunk your argument entirely. Are we done now?
"Plasma being held in to place by a magnet inside a CONTAINER..."
? Seriously? You are joking?... Right? We have container because we cant have vacuum on a surface of earth without it... We could run fusion reactor in space without container, but that would be terribly impractical and would cost 10000x more to create one and test it... Nah, you must be internet troll... You cant be that ignorant...
"you can’t have 8 inches per miles squared"
Simple question to you: you have this equation, where exactly do i insert observers height? Before 8 inches or after?
"because there is no curve seen on the mirror like floor for 400 miles and sometime farther"
? 400 miles? Please, provide coordinates where you have 400 miles of flat plane... Do you even live on earth?
"the HORIZON if flat"
But its not. Create 3d simulation with accurate scales, test your claim, after you fail, come back and say: i'm sorry, i was wrong.
Earth is HUGE, dont expect to observe curvature on its surface... Atleast not to the sides...
"there is no experiment of a vacuum and air coexisting at all "
Fusion reactor. I told you about this once already... Another example would be... Wait for it... Earth and its atmosphere.
"demons Tatar’s"
What the what now?
"There is no such thing as gravity and there is no such thing as space time"
Gravity is a label on observable fact that objects with mass attract objects with mass. Space can be seen by going outside and looking up. Space time? No idea what this should even mean at this point.
"VERY SPACE OF REALITY BY CURVING FROM MASS?"
What?
"Someone must show me how a vacuum would have no affect on a high pressure system"
Lets test your basic knowledge about reality: Does atmosphere have gradient? Like that thing where if you went up it would become less and less dense? Is this a thing from reality? Because it is, unless you even tan to deny this one, then you are being help. So as we do have gradient of atmosphere, going roughly from 1 atmosphere to... Wait for it... Wait... 0! its not highly pressurised as there is no point where you would have big differences between pressure, its a gradient... GRADIENT. Wait, you do know what gradient is?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dragonoftheeast695
I'm saying that you can't have both at same time, just like every single game out there are based on either flat world or a globe, one or the other, you can't have both at same time, its just logical contradiction like having "round square" it just can't exist.
And most games are based on flat surface for simpler calculations, down is just down on Z axis, no need to calculate complicated stuff based on 3D coordinates where it would change based on where you are on the map. It doesn't produce life like results, but its good enough for that purpose, still, its just a flat map. Games which needs full planets simulation, like flight sims or some space games, those would use globe model with more complex calculations, still, its just a globe even if you want on the surface and horizon is being rendered ahead of you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2