Comments by "Joe Qi" (@i6power30) on "Two Bit da Vinci"
channel.
-
191
-
11
-
10
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@default_user_89 That's not a social problem we need to address seperately. Not just minumum wage workers, but highly paid knowledge and creative workers will eventually be replaced by AIs some day. Do we limit the capabilities of AIs just so humans can keep their jobs or let technology advance freely and see what benefits can bring? it's a philosophical debate beyond our current understanding.
For example, displaced coders, laywers, accountants, radiologists by AI. Should they become carpenters, plumbers, personal care workers that cannot be replaced by machines? Should the latter mentioned positions be compensated more or at least equally as coders, laywers , accountants etc, that are traditionally considered require higher degrees? In a way, AI turns it upside down, anything that require brain suddenly can be replaced by AI. But things that require hands-on or personal skills still need human touch. Plumbers, electricians etc, may one day be compensated as much as radiologists or software engineers.
1