Comments by "" (@billyandrew) on "The Independent"
channel.
-
@euanstewart1411
so, basically, you are scared shitless and have done no research on the inherent flaws contained within the current test being employed...the test in which the very guy who created the test highlighted said flaws and which the govt and it's agents deliberately chose to ignore!
You requested no sources of the OP, yet claim they have none.
????!
You requested no evidence and, again, claimed they had none.
????!
That's not how science works, but you are ignorant of these basic steps.
You then request the OP to shut up.
????!
I'm wondering if you pressed you fingers into your ears and la-la-la-lad a few times, as well, in an attempt to dispel the unpleasant truth from your conscoius mind?
Tell me, Euan, this lab in which you work...do your duties mainly comprise of sweeping up, emptying bins and, occasionally, making the boffins a cuppa?
I ask, because there appears to be no scientific curiosity in you.
Are you, in fact, possibly a cleaner in, say, a biscuit factory, part of your duties being to Mr Sheen the research lab worktops and sweep up crumbs, perhaps?
Smh.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jonathan_Doe_
He's a lot smarter in a devious manner, than many give him credit for.
For a start, he has you fooled into believing the buffoon act.
The party knew his track record.
Do you think they'd give the job to an idiot?
No, they gave it to the smartest, most devious among them with the most likelihood of winning them a general election.
He had the majority of the public eating out of his hand, which is why they were returned on a majority.
Why do you think he was fobbed off, initially, with the Foreign Minister's role?
They, running the show at tory HQ at the time, didn't trust the cunning bastard, so were trying to keep him out of the loop.
Didn't work, as you'll recall.
Even abroad, he was interfering, telling his chums in the media who was ballsing up what and how things would be run differently, if he'd been given that particular role.
He deliberately screwed up some foreign relations, leaving them with no option but to recall him.
Shortly afterwards he was leading the party.
Don't underestimate him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Back in the day, pre 70s, the politicians, being cut of a similar but not the same cloth as the scam artists we are beset by today, were more subtle, due to possessing higher intelligence.
Nowadays, we are lumbered with clods with no understanding of finesse.
They unashamedly let bullshit splatter from their gaping, slack jawed mouths without refining it into a more acceptable form, due to them being dull-witted and also down to the public dropping it's standards.
We no longer see the guilty, unable to deftly parry a justifiable accusation aside, fall upon their sword.
This clumsy, dishonourable, modern shower brazenly ignore accusations outright without answer, bolt off on unassociated tangents or rely on narcissist defence gambit #101 and immediately project the accusation straight back at the accuser, in the hope those witnessing the exchange will, somehow, suffer a bout of amnesia and forget who is actually meant to be defending themself against the charge.
Sadly and all too often this is exactly what hsppens and the dolts supporting the guilty party actually manage to convince themselves their candidate was the one that made the accusation in the first place!
Sheer idiocy manifest.
This cardboard being in the vid is a typical example of such, evading, ignoring, then, in desperation, projecting his own failings onto his accuser.
Unfortunately, we have the govts we earned through our own inability or reluctance to call them to task long before this current abysmal state in proceedings was reached.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1