Comments by "thewaytruthandlife" (@thewaytruthandlife) on "Veritasium" channel.

  1. 8
  2. 5
  3. 5
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. OK i like this way of reasoning. but from this point of view I ask you diamonds and dinosaurbones are said to be millions of yrs old c14 is detectable only till a max of 60.000 to 90.000 ys old objects why do we still find C14 in diamonds  and dinosaur bones??? dinosaurs are said to have been wipes out 60-70 million yrs ago it is being said that humans came to be only about 3 million yrs ago maximum why then do we still find drawings and carvings of dinosaur like animals on all kinds of human artworks world wide ? (ankor wat temple cambodja 800 yrs old, Ica burial stones, just to name a few) it is being said that earth layers form over millions of yrs yet we do find earth layers that have been deposited in matter of hours or days (mt st helens, tsunami deposits, surtsey island).  it is being said that continents are 100's of million yrs old yet englands and australia's and frances  coast is eroded away meters per year. it is being said that animals like the coulancanth, dragonflies, daddy longlegs, frogs lived 100's million yrs ago, yet we see them unchanged as living fossils and so in fact could have ended up in any earth layer you dug up....  it is being said that dinosaurs lived 60-70 illionyrs ago  yet still fresh blood tissues and blood cells are being found in dinosaur bones with enough c14 to measure it is being said that living cells (as we know them)  originate from 100% dead materials/chemicals and that these evolved into higher organisms like lets say worms (as we know them)  Yet science has never ever reproduced ths proces to the full More surprisingly it is that in chemistry an newly found synthesis route can only be recognised scientifically, when it is reproduced by other scientists....  This has been standard procedure for every chemical around to day... EXCEPT for the chemistry of our origens.... it is the countre tests and proof to explore the validity that makes a theory interesting you kind of said in this video... about which I agree.  but why does that go for all kinds of theories EXCEPT when the theory deals with our origens ???? einstein said one day when he was interviewed and people held in front of him that if 100 would oopose his theory that it was a worthless theory then einstein replied back ooh 1 was enough..... why does that go for all kind of science subjects EXCEPT when it deals with our origens ????
    3
  7. 3
  8.  Juno Donat  life didnt need a starting point ?????????? sorry ????? since its chemical reactions ??? what ???? are you realy that simple ???? evidence ?? please tell me where... ?? never seen it ..... ooh Yeah God is emperically been proven to be factual..... there is so muc evidence that He is real.... man... the movie above is just one of it.... ooh yea there are tests you can do yourself at home..... read the bible and keep track of history and the news.... you see in the bible God gave us prophesies.... and ALL you can test them yourself.....you see there are about 3000 prophesies, of which about 2500 have already been fullfilled and about 500 are for the future and some of them you CAN see them being fulfilled RIGHT as we speak.... so test material enough.. BUT let me guess... you do NOT WANT it to be true....... but that is no argument of God not BEING fatcually true... you see Gods existence does NOT depent on your believe in Him.... He does NOT disappear because you dont believ in Him.. either God is there for real or He isnt as simple as that... there is no other choice... and coming/bringing up many other gods is simply the same as saying that the ONE and only TRUE God of the bible isnt real and just a mental thing of humans....so it falls in the category of denial of God being real.... you see ther IS only ONE God ... nothing else..... the other "gods" are nothing more than demons pretending to be God.... and yeah they have some power.....IF YOU GIVE it to them. the fact that the world is a mess is because people refuse to accept the ONE and ONLY true God Of the Bible... that means people prefer t follow demons (the so called other "gods" ) in stead of God.... even YOU choose to follow other gods.... you may not know or realize it but you do.....
    3
  9. 3
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14.  Juno Donat  well dont worry... IF for some reason ... you will NEVER change your mind on this before you die (yes..... BEFORE !!! you die.. not after you die... since then it will be TOO late !!!) .... then you will meet with the devil yourself ... when he comes to torture you or some of his demons.... so one day you WILL find out its not mythical but more real that you want it to be.... so lets see how mythical you then think about them...... you see there are 2 options either God but also the devil are real ..they exist for real or they do not... there are no other options. Now it turns out to be that they ARE factually real.... that is why this world is so well and super highly organized on one hand (Gods input see the above movie.. that can ONLY be designed very carefully and put together miticulously) .... but on the other hand that we are able to make a mess of it ... due to satans influence on us and in our lives and our FREE CHOICE to listen to his lies..... so if you end up in hell it is by your own free choice NOT to listen to God.... you see ...our universe ....but also living organisms (see above movie again) are so highly organiszed that can only mean that there MUST be a God who cooked this all up.... there is no other realistic option. it wold be strange to you if only a bunch atoms due to some energy input would get organized to a space shuttle or cray super computer right ??? these objects ahve also been designed and created by human hands... well our bodies are even far far afr more advanced than the sapce shuttle or a cray super computer and they would be here by random chance ????? Here there is an interesting paper about this subject... academia.edu/42979330/Is_mathematical_probability_the_same_as_physical_reality_the_power_of_the_average_and_how_life_began and It ONLY doesnt carry weight for people like yourself....
    2
  15.  Juno Donat  nope... I point out to you the consequences of your choices... on top of your denial of satan/the devil as being real... you started that one....not me... my respons would be different if you said tht God would be mythical.... but no you said yourself that the devil is mythical according to you... well then that was my respons and no I was NOT indoctrinated.... I was looking for God myself.... I asked Him myself in 2004 I wanted to know if God was real and asked Him to open my eyes for the truth..... I never truisted people in these matters since people can tell me loads of crap... so I thought to myself OK IF God is real... then HE is the only one who canb give me the correct answer... so I asked the Creator of the universe (since I didnt know who He was so I kept it neutral) and from that momenbt on God started to acted more openly to me in my life... He was always present on my back ground since I was not aware of Him being real.... sa you do right now. so NO I was NOT indoctrinated as you are ..... you see YOU are indoctrinated by anti-God information. Which makes sense from a pure rebellious against God point of view. No church was involved, I accepted God/Jesus Christ in my own house without anybody being present then God and me..... He showed me He is real..... so no infleuence of out side when God opend my eyes for HIS truth.... it was like Neo after swallowing the red pill.... God opend my eyes for reality..... The other gods that you describe are the troicks of satan to keep you away from the ONE and TRUE only God.... just as you want to find YOUR most favorite chocloate of all time in the shop of willy wonka where 10.000's different chocolates are being presented to you..... you get confused ... satanis trick and it seems to work on you (and on most people) ... the more religions the devilk presents ... the harder it for people like you to find the one and Only true God but there is a solution as I told you; SIMPLY SINCERELY as the ONE and ONLY GOD to open your eyes for the truth ....
    2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. Yeah right, mutations know several sources and it does not matter what source induces the mutation. since mutations are just 100% pure random and coincidental including for the hypothetical process of evolution. You see what you call the natural form of mutation that supposedly cause evolution is exactly 100% the same as what I am talking about, there is no difference, and cells do not distinguish between one or an hypothetical other form of mutation. that is crap. Mutations are mutations. since mutations are caused by random processes WITHOUT any form of intelligent input/mechanism that can differentiate between cancer mutations and supposed evolution mutations. This statement of yours is 100% baloney and crap. Mutations are caused by a) cosmic radiation b) chemicals (carcinogenic, like blackened BBQ meat ) c) UV light from the sun, d) copy errors e) natural decay of elements in your body (c14 to N14 of 40K to 40Ar) f) natural decay of elements outside your body. (and 1 or 2 more). there are no other sources. and in neither of these cases organism cells can distinguish between damaging mutations or dangerous cancerous mutations. your hypothesis is crap, sorry.disproving evolution ? watch my youtube channel. improving evolution is not realistic since there is nothing to begin with so how to improve something that isn't there ?? The model; used to be called evolution has never been proven; the lesser fossils the deeper we dig ?? well maybe you haven't look every where around, the bottom of the oceans for example. You see the sea creatures in a Noah flood model would be buried to the lowest places and since the mountains rose and the valleys sank due to the flood (according to the bible), the majority of fossils are being formed by the flushing away of these sea creatures to deeper grounds; in the sea/ocean bed floors. But that has not been researched yet, has it. only land fossils have been investigated. so your model could be 100% wrong because of misinterpretations of data and missing data.
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1) mutations are mutations, by which eaver means at which ever places. why because mutations happen at random at random places. there is no intelligence behind mutations and thus it is no constructive guided process. so it cannot distinguish between yes or not being evolutionistic. it is random. 2) read the bible: the fountains of the deep broke open: there was and is water in the earths crust lok at "the bejing anomaly" there is still an entire ocean in the earths crust. enough to wipe out all life except 8 people in a boat and to create the 95% of sedimentairy rocks that the world has today including the fossils. you skipped 3) 4) Noah never saw a chiwawah he saw a wolf like dog.... from which all other dogs were breeded in the last 4500 yrs, that is VARIATION..... Noah never saw a african and indonesian elephant: he jsyt saw an elephant. Noah never saw a leopard, tiger, cheetah, lion, etc he just saw a big cat like animal from whic all these animals have VARARIATED. Human kind has breeded ever since 1000's of different variations of animals plants etc just by breeding. The ark was more then big enough to carry al the basic kinds of land animals he could probably carry 4 times more. 5) wrong assumption, God was NOT created: God was always there. God is from eternity to eternity. You ASSUME / BELIEVE that God is just as us stuck in time.... He is not stuck in time. God is out side of time space and matter. do I fully understand that ?? no but that is what God states about Himself if you study the bible very well. I do not recognize the pope as my religious leader since I am not catholic, I am an independently messianic zionistic creationistic christian I have nothing with the pope and next to that even if I would have: the pope is WRONG in accepting evolution. he is no scientist so how can he judge evolution correctly. I am a scientist s I amke my own judgements about that. I am not above the pope NOR is the pope above me. He is just as human as you and I am. we are all on the same level towards God. I do not believe the pope is God send, nor catholisism, man your question are so much a portrayal of your ignorance I could write a book based on your silly question alone. Yes I have contact with God: He is my Father. and He wants to be yours too. to do in heaven ? ooh by that Time God will show me. Other gods ??? there are no other gods. there are demons PRETENDING to be God to distract you from the Only and ONLY TRUE God... other gods are a trick of the devil to keep you away from God-Jesus. It seems to work with you and the majority of people. Deutronomy 22: So you do factually approve of adultery, free sex outside the marriage and that YOUR wife has sex with other man ?? that is what you basically say.... well good luck with that one then in your future..... lets see how much you realy like that .....that your partner cheats upon you..... it will be a cryer for you pal, can tell you that..... its no fun .... but hee I imagine you will surely enjoy it...... imagen your wife being banged by an other fellow..... good luck with that one pal... you are going to need it. ooh and please leave the stones in the floor when you find your wife cheating on you, in front of your own eyes. Try to avoid the desire of killing her... will you ??
    1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. it is a good video, which everybody with a slight of interest of science MUST see. It shows clearly what I have personaly experienced in my carreer; science is OFTEN WRONG..... !!! this is a very very important finding and conclusion. However it is the question that the statistics is correct: I mean the normal Gauss-distribution is a theoretical model and my experience, with reality is that the gaussian curve works pretty ok and is sufficient for a major of fields where accuracy is NOT that important. BUT it turns out that lots of experimental data is NOT neatly Gaussian but skewed Gaussian. Now Gaussian bell curves gives you an idea, but need NOT to be, the correct statistical model for this issue, I do not know. It turns out that theory and practice deviate lots and lots of times in many different subjects ending up with not so neatly gaussian curves as theory indicates. Now theoretically (IF the gaussian curve is the correct curve to apply !!) the standard deviation sigma S is used and 3S is a frequent heard limit to accept or reject an answer since it represents 99.7% of all possible correct answeres. But S values should be established over many measurements before the S can be accepted it self. Thing is with each measurement taken the S value changes a little bit since it is dependent on the measurements it self. and how to know if a measure ment is not an out-lier so should be rejected. it turns out to be, as I found in practise. that applying statistics is not that easy. the S value is determined by the measurements and the measurements to be accepted or rejected depends on the S value; THAT is circular reasoning to begin with. I know we do not yet have a better instrument and we have to start somewhere, but lets keep things in correct perspective.
    1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. Becoming obsolete will always happen; why ? simple... the indecandescent lightbulk became more and more obsolete due to TL type of lights and the developement of the LED for example. Making something close to perfect (which is never possible) stimulates producers to even make better & more ingenious stuff. And no matter how perfect objects may be made... they will in the end always break. Granted it may take longer periods of time that is true, but better make some thing durable than you have more time to research new even better stuff. But the planned obsoleteness is just a sign and shows us the reality of profit minded people instead of durability environmental minded people. profit minded people dont care about the health of our planet they only care about their own big time wallets. so basically it is the profit minded industry that is to blame for the environmental issues we currently have. These producers who are profit minded need to be banned and replaced by durable minded producers; we have a planet to save from polluting. BUT there is a downside: Products that are durable are MORE expensive, but they last longer. We can thus see that poluting of the planet is caused by production/profit minded people. It also means more jobs in the R&D field. More people who think of new & better stuff on a continuous basis. I go for durability. No shops like IKEA for me... thats a cheap & a polluting way of living in the long run. And we see that the environmental issues are piling up and in the end cost MORE than tackling that problemn right from the beginning by minimizing the polluting ways of production. Durability is a new market.
    1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1