Comments by "verdebusterAP" (@verdebusterAP) on "The Sun" channel.

  1.  @tajikboy2477  Sorry clown but the Saudi's position and Ukraine are two very different things Saudi was surprise attack whereas Ukraine to date has shot down over 40 drones using both EW and missles/guns
    3
  2. Good job guys, L2 getting ready to kick some russian ass
    3
  3. Duh, he takes his orders from Putin
    3
  4. Step right up and get your lights punched out by Ukraine
    3
  5. When Ukraine forces start using NATO precision rounds, Russia will be really in the hurt locker
    3
  6. The likely case is that the US has in fact given Israel its most advanced bunker buster, the GBU-72 so now Hamas is running as this strike shows clearly that their underground are easy targets
    3
  7. Points for ingenuity but those missiles are spray and pray not precise They would be working on ways to they can strike precisely at long ranges so they are not wasting ammo
    3
  8.  @michaelfaraday8391  Ukraine did and they did confirm it
    3
  9. Ukraine is called contested airspace The A-10 cant operate in contested airspace
    3
  10. KA-BOOM
    3
  11.  @weasle2904  its STOVL not SVTOL. The Harrier's design prevents it from going supersonic so yes something different was need. The Harrier was good for what it uses for
    2
  12. Thats how cooperation works. But if you want get technical, the UK and the US Marines had been working on STOVL long before the JSF. They had identified the Harrier lack of supersonic speed as major hindrance back in the 80s. So both sides had been working the issue for long time
    2
  13. Russia didn't pay the cost of upgrading its gunships weapons with better precision capabilities and are paying for dearly The US has used its Hellfire missiles against personnel and other targets several times in Iraq and Afghanistan The Hellfire was upgraded from AGM-114A- Armored vehicles to AGM-114K, M, N, and P for various targets to AGM-114R Hellfire II-All targets allowing Hellfires to be used for any target. The US went a step further with Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) upgrades the 70mm into precision laser guided munition costing only 22K per missile considerably less than the Hellfire Neither the Ka-52, Mi-28 or Mi-24/35 has any sort of weapons upgrades , hence why videos of them spraying and praying are common and them uses precision missiles are very rare The US lost 42 AH-64/AH-1Ws in Iraq from 2003-2010 and 16 AH-64/AH-1W in the 2020 years in Afghan Russia is 35 KA-52/Mi-28/Mi-35 combined in Ukraine so far The key difference is that Iraq and Afghan, The NATO/US made damn sure to cut both countries off from the outside which allowed them to severely limit what weapons enemy forces could get Russia's tactical blunder was leaving Western Ukraine open to the West Without them cutting off supplies , Ukraine has gotten better and better air defense equipment Now they Aspide, NASAMS and IRIS-T which moves them from only having SHORAD defenses with 3 to 5 mile range to medium range defenses able to engage targets over 20 miles away
    2
  14. Nope, they are still very much legal but most militaries employ on them actual targets whereas Russia using them where ever
    2
  15.  @prizefighter8699  Same as with the with strike on the Rostov-na-Donu The images showed that pressure hull was compromised thus making it a complete loss The images show the port side of the Askold completely destroyed
    2
  16. The warship Moskva has not sunk it has simply been reclassified as a new type of submarine and is on a special underwater mission
    2
  17. Sorry Ivan but the West does not need to resort to such tactics Putin's retarded decision making has been more than enough help getting Ukraine the help it needs
    2
  18. How dare you apply logic to Russian propaganda lol
    2
  19. See a few words and fakers crack like glass As for bridge vulnerability The issue with this was not the bridge but the ship and poor decision making of the crew The ship had no back up or emergency power to its propulsion. One the ship lost the power, they should have been trying to turn the ship around The ship veering into the bridge shows the that bow thruster was working but why they veered in that direction again ??? This harbor is shallow not deep The only way that you could protection this bridge from that much mass would have been with massive amount of X-blocs or A-jacks and they would have arranged so the kinetic energy is focus away from the bridge Easier to do when you building a bridge as you add to the design considerations substantially harder when the bridge is decades older and wasnt designed with that in mind
    2
  20.  @danielkaufmann15  Its simple facts The bridge was built in 1977. 3 years later there was an accident that mandated newer bridges be built with better protection against ship strikes but there is no amount of protection that would stopped that ship from tearing through that bridge
    2
  21. ​ @Ubique2927  Your YT degree is hilarious You are literally none of the above Bridge protections measures are meant to redirect not adsorb Secondly ,the bridge was built in 1977, 3 years before disaster in 1980 that mandated newer bridges be built with multiple levels of protections Lastly clown, in 1970s, the average container ship weighed 26,000 tons Today, they weigh over 90,000 tons That damn near the same mass as an aircraft carrier The ship should turned around a lot sooner
    2
  22. Oh wow after 11 months
    2
  23. The die hard Russian trolls are out in full denial propaganda mode trying to spin the coup Ukraine and the West couldnt have asked for a better gift
    2
  24. its just sham referndum
    2
  25.  @shortrandomusername  Thats more than painful
    2
  26. Poor cannon fodder
    2
  27. Asset denial good job Ukraine
    2
  28. It was all fun and games till he get held accountable
    2
  29. As a criminal
    2
  30. So its okay for them to put people lives at risk but not ok for them to punish for it right
    2
  31. If heavy vehicles can't cross it , then its pointless that means that retreating forces would have to abandon their vehicles which again is major victory for Ukraine either way
    2
  32.  @John-hu9qg  You do realize that its hilarious that the only thing that you bots and trolls can mention is Donbass and Lunhansk We are in Kherson ,not Donbass and Lunhansk LMAO Right now, despite Russia's alleged claims, Ukraine forces are making head way in Kherson So Russia can have those area for now but make no mistake, those gains in those areas are only temporary The West's reluctance to supply Ukraine with advanced systems fading very quickly Ukraine's wish list of weapons steadily being filled which means bad news for Russia
    2
  33.  @B01  Thats a massive overstatement First the Ukraine only has handful of Bayraktars. They started with 6 and currently have between 15-20 secondly the Bayraktar is no MQ-9 it carries just 4 light weight munitions while the MQ-9 models can carry up 16 missiles or 500bs PGMs It limited munitions means it selectively target Now Ukraine forces are hitting targets but not that high If the Bayraktar had the MQ-9 payload, that convoy outside Kyiv would have completely destroyed its not doing bad but not as high as you state
    2
  34.  @neilfoster814  US weapons are designed for precision while Russian weapons are designed to be brute force The Apache is vastly superior to the Ka-52 and Mi-28 First it has video link capability with UAVs which allow them see what UAVs Secondly the AGM-114L or Longbow hellfire can be fired on targets not in visual range This goes back to why the Apache was given video link capability with UAV Its allow to the attack from stand off range and still be precise As you see, the KA-52 has no such capability so it has to get up close Their luck was the limited Ukraine capabilites
    2
  35. That note Ukraine thats how you clear minefield
    2
  36. You see the freaking wave coming but stick around like a deer in the headlights ?
    2
  37. Israel strike again
    2
  38.  @Nillix1  Actually you can Did the Talbian fight the US head no, nope They have to resort to IED and suicide bombers People dont understand the differences between warfare
    2
  39. It's pretty easy to point out Russia's failurism in Ukraine When you see videos of Apaches in action, you see them normally striking with precision. The KA-52 and Mi-28 have been running and gunning with cannons and unguided rockets. The US made the Hellfire into all purpose weapon whereas the KA-52 and Mi-28s are still optimized for anti-armor The Ukraine forces are not attacking with armor that much so ?? The US for Persistent Close Air Support (PCAS) developed both the MQ-1 and MQ-9 drones which can stay airborne for hours with a load of weapons Again, Russia lacks a drone capability of doing PCAS like the MQ-1 or MQ-9 The US spent a fortunate developing its conventional capabilities which lead to targeting pods and other advanced conventional weapons Russia halfed assed trying to claim its weapons are as good at half the cost and we know that Russia's conventional capabilities are extremely poor
    2
  40. This conflict has shown that the Russia army is woefully unequipped to fight conventionally If the US was in Ukraine They would have MQ-9s carrying out precision strikes The videos of Russian UAV has been heavily edited propaganda and completely underwhelming The Apache has demonstrated its ability to attack targets from stand off range The Ka-52 has demonstrated its ability to constantly end in fields either damaged or in completely destroyed The A-10 has demonstrated its durability Th Su-25 not so much The A-10 has 7 planes in combat through its life The Su-25 has lost 5 planes just in Ukraine
    2
  41. They are going to be busy dealing with all that UXO
    2
  42. Its fine that will be buff out eventually
    2
  43. They are capturing cities and paying a hefty price in the process
    2
  44. ok boomer
    2
  45. Its being held accountability Sure Congress lies but he took took to a whole another level
    2
  46. Yeah how about no All you have done is put target on Cybercab for hackers Secondly, humans dont break down however technology does
    2
  47.  @willainerosenau6782  LMAO
    2
  48.  @taekwondotime  So you are basically naming countries that dont matter China can't do anything. Since NATO is united , US can easily take China while NATO backs EU forces dealing with Russia To deal with Iran, all the US has to do is give keys to armory to Israel. Israel would love nothing move than having completely access to US weapons since as JASSMs which can be integrated into their F-15s very quickly. JSM can be added to their F-35s. LRASM can be equipped via a topside canister launcher to the ships Israel with the US latest precision weapons would quickly level Iran North Korea relies heavily on China to back to them Unlike the SK, NK has been heavily sanctioned so their capabilities in conventional war are a literally joke Lastly India would never join India wants more US made tech as their Russia equipment has been abyssal When they faced off against Pakistan, the short comings of the Russia tech was clear
    2
  49.  @markarmstead9327  The irony with that statement is the even if Ukraine's forces fall Russian forces have the worst possible insurgency to ahead Insurgency forces armed with ATGMs, MANPADs, Loitering munitions as well US made M82 Barret anti-material rifles Insurgency with that much firepower Nightmare doesnt do it justice
    2
  50. Good job
    2