Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "RFU News — Reporting from Ukraine" channel.

  1.  @kobekkop  "Yes they're, they have been getting aid from NATO since 2017". Your question was: "Tell me... ...if they're still relying for NATO in every single way." No, they're not. "they have been getting aid from NATO since 2017". I think you'll find it was 2014 when ruSSia first broke all the treaties and Ukraine asked for (and received) aid from some members of NATO.
    1
  2. Yup, ruSSia is losing manpower. Losing lots of manpower. A whole generation of ruSSian men is being wiped out by Putin's greed. Russian men are being treated as bullets - they have no value to the leaders of ruSSia who would prefer to gain more wealth by attacking a neighbour, than to look after the welfare of the ruSSian people. And dumb ruSSian trolls support Putin. How foolish!
    1
  3.  @noone6037  Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  4.  @sylviamaresca8852  Yeah, I don't understand your ass either. What does it say? He-haw.
    1
  5. ​ @beba5865 Facts. Pure facts. You should try some.
    1
  6.  @timparker4160  Ah Tim, you're back, attempting to spread disinformation with fanciful claims. Where and how is russia winning? Name a city that the russian army has captured in the last twelve months? Come on, just one. And I'll name six cities that the Ukrainian army has liberated in those same twelve months. But you can't can you - because the russian army hasn't captured a city in over twelve months - because russia is losing.
    1
  7. @@ajcm2020 I see you too are a misinformed russian troll. Since the Ukrainian army brought the russian army to a halt over a year ago, the ukrainian army has liberated well over 18,000 sq km - including six cities.
    1
  8.  @Customercf  Yeah, you just keep believing that. Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  9.  @Rtg5637  No, I didn't miss anything. I said "ruSSian army gains in the last twelve months have been so small as to not register on the map". The ruSSian army didn't take Soledar, nor Bakhmut. So I say again, the Ukrainian counter-offensive, small as it may be, has gained more land than the entire ruSSian army has gained in twelve months - in just 5 months.
    1
  10.  @Rtg5637  "when he says grey zone be sure that he again underestimates Russian progress". Sorry, but RFU has proven to be quite accurate - which is more than we can say for you.
    1
  11.  @Rtg5637  Well then you are wrong - probably mis-informed or trying to spread disinformation. The ruSSian army did not take Soledar, nor Bakhmut. It was the former Wagner that took those two locations - a force that no longer exists to bring a few victories to a dysfunctional ruSSia. What's more, you are even more inaccurate. You stated "but yesterday this channel and others said that Terrikon is a fortress that Russians can never overcome". Yesterday this channel reported on the Kherson oblast. Do you really stand by what you wrote? Is there anything else you would like to BS about? Silly ruSSian troll.
    1
  12.  @Rtg5637  I haven't run out of sane arguments. Keep sending your BS and I'll keep refuting it and pointing out the truth. You were wrong about the achievements of the ruSSian army over the past twelve months (or ten months if you prefer) and you are wrong about him mentioning the Terrikon yesterday. If you post disinformation then you ARE a silly ruSSian troll. Learn to live with that.
    1
  13. As is your spelling.
    1
  14. ​​ @TheRealBillBob  Are you having difficulty concentrating? There was no mention of Zaluzhny in the video, nor in this thread, yet your tiny mind immediately flitted there. I know you Russian trolls are thick, but TRY to focus mate.
    1
  15. Will it? And did Putin tell you this in bed last night?
    1
  16. What are you even talking about, troll? Did you not watch the video, Dombass?
    1
  17.  @ZXHZ  Exactly what? There was coverage of "the offensive of the ruZZians" in the Kherson oblast. This video is about the Kherson oblast.
    1
  18.  @albinklein7680  Silly misinformed ruSSian troll.
    1
  19.  @bbourbaki  "If by keeping what they got so far". Which ruSSia hasn't. Only lost small amounts in the last year, but lost land nonetheless. "having Ukraine beg for peace". You have got to be kidding !!! Where on Earth did you get such incorrect information? Ukraine rejected any "ruSSian fake peace" at the beginning of the war. It is ruSSia that keeps saying they want peace "negotiations". The only thing Ukraine is begging for is enough weapons to kick ruSSia's ass more effectively.
    1
  20. I agree.
    1
  21.  @wishusknight3009  That was Russians running away, dear Russian troll.
    1
  22.  @robkit007  Why are you here?
    1
  23. Your argument is only valid if you accept that it is North Korea that is shelling Ukraine, and Iran that is launching drones at Ukraine.
    1
  24.  @markbryant4641  "I'm very much looking forward to hearing about the details of the negotiations that were drafted and initialled in March 22" I think you'll find they included ceeding large parts of Ukraine to ruSSia. People like Boris convinced Zelensky that Ukraine could do better with western help. And they were right - the occupied areas have reduced from ~26% of Ukraine to ~17% of Ukraine. "And it could have ended in April 2022" Yes, and the world is very lucky it didn't. We are very lucky the Zelensky and his army stayed and stood against the invader. "This invasion could have been very easily avoided" No it couldn't have been. Russia is determined to keep Ukraine under its control. The invasion could only have been avoided through loss of sovereignty or land.
    1
  25.  @PartlyXenon  "Just put our hands in front of our eyes regarding all the allegations of corruption?" We should be grateful for the corruption - without which the ruSSian army would have taken Ukraine. It was corruption that meant that ruSSian machinery was not maintained, that tyres on ruSSian military vehicles were beyond their service life, etc. Be thankful that ruSSia is one of the most corrupt nations on Earth.
    1
  26. Ukraine is chip, chipping away at Russian logistics in the occupied territories. Considering the losses on both sides it would be stupid to stop now, as cracks are already appearing. Soon the weather will force a stop anyway, lets hope Ukraine manages a big breakthrough before then.
    1
  27.  @bartoszromaniuk5594  I guess he likes Zaluzhny.
    1
  28.  @laurie9557  I have to agree with you Laurie, the AFU has more experience than any other western nation in modern warfare - at present. Every other armed force could learn from them.
    1
  29.  @zokilauda  When one country uses military force to attempt to invade another country, that is "War". Dress it any way you like, it's still war. The territory ruSSia is claiming is NOT ruSSian. In fact Belgorod (Bilhorod) has been Ukrainian not too long ago. Crimea has only been "ruSSian" for 9 years out of the last 100+ years, and Ukrainian for 69 of the last 100+ years. ruSSian citizens were not 'terrorized there at the border area" apart from when ruSSia set up terrorist organisations in the Donbas, armed them, then sent in troops to cause mayhem. It is extremely retarded and naive to think that ruSSia had justification for invading Ukraine. Please check your facts before making a fool of yourself on international forums.
    1
  30.  @cheff0161  "It's reporting what happened on 21 December". No it isn't.
    1
  31.  @ЕвгенийКоролев-ш9р  Here's something else on the public domain - in the last two years the ruSSian army has captured one Ukrainian city. Ukraine has liberated 6 Ukrainian cities. Go and see.
    1
  32. I agree. I think Pootin will use Wagner to attack a NATO country and then claim "nothing to do with me". I believe NATO should warn Pootin of the consequences of trying this stunt.
    1
  33.  @yellowtunes2756  "Ukrainian commanders send their troops on suicidal missions". Except they weren't "suicidal missions". The anti-Putin russians returned from their multiple attacks on Belgorod. The troops returned from Snake Island. The attacks on Crimea were mostly successful. There are still Ukrainian troops in Krinky. You don't mention russian commanders sending their troops in suicidal waves in Avdiivka and many, many other towns in Ukraine.
    1
  34.  @yellowtunes2756  "You gotta admit that Ukraine sacrifices their soldiers for media effect a lot". No we don't.
    1
  35.  @yellowtunes2756  "I can't think of a single time when Russia did anything for PR stunt." Short memory. Putin (the coward) is reported to have ventured to about 200km front the front lines - that was a publicity stunt.
    1
  36.  @yellowtunes2756  "I can't think of a single time when ruzzia did anything for PR stunt". Very short memory. Putin standing with a candle in memory of 130 odd Moscovites who died last week was a publicity stunt (as we know Putin does not care about the lives of his people, or he wouldn't have sent 400,000 of them to be injured, maimed, or die in Ukraine).
    1
  37.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  They were Ukrainian troops with no air support who were ambushed by the ruSSians with air power and artillery (on 24th February, 2022). Of course the ruSSians should have won in just a few weeks, or that's what would you expect (Putin did). But it didn't happen. So just how bad is the ruSSian military.
    1
  38.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Air dominance". Are you?
    1
  39.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Su 57 . Supported by advanced air defence on the ground". What Su-57s? What advanced air defence on the ground? Where is all this mythical equipment?
    1
  40.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Russian infrastructure after 2.5 years of war is still 100% intact". This must be the joke thread - or you're deluded.
    1
  41.  @wishusknight3009  I think you're right - user-ft2bt9kw7x is trolling us. Nobody could be that deluded.
    1
  42.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "The fact that ruSSian infrastructure is 100% intact". Have you tried looking up the meaning of "fact"? You base your statements on fiction. "S400, s500 physically exist they are not myth". Yes S-400 exist, but they're not very good. Only one S-500 exists, but it's not very good either as Ukraine has already wiped out several of its launchers.
    1
  43.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Firstly the Ukrainian troops had air defence cover" No it didn't, just a few old s-300s. "ruSSia put no time limit on the SMO". Maybe not, but they did expect it to be over in half a month. They are 875 days behind schedule. "The ruSSians are doing it well". Actually, no they are not. They are doing it very poorly and are an embarrassment. "in Vietnam for 11 years Afghanistan 20 years Korea 4 years". I've checked and there is no "Vietnam", "Afghanistan" nor "Korea" in Ukraine. Whataboutism - what about sticking to the subject (I did find a New York in Ukraine - if that helps you cope)
    1
  44.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Do you have alternative information that is substantiated that contradicts what the ruSSian MOD say". Just about every time the ruSSian MoD says something there is alternative information. Remember how their MoD said they had destroyed several Leopard 2 tanks - before any had arrived into Ukraine.
    1
  45.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Name parts of Russian infrastructure that have been destroyed to the point of the damage effecting the battle front. If you cannot give examples of major damage..". I don't need to. I only have to mention one single piece of ruSSian infrastructure that is less than 100% intact to prove you WRONG. "Rostov-on-Don" submarine. Crimean bridge. S-500. About 3 dozen oil refineries. The "Moskova", Numerous electrical substations in Belgorod, The list is too long, and I can't be faffed looking up more examples for a ruSSian with a deluded mind.
    1
  46.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Do you remember when a Ukrainian pilot filmed himself shooting down numerous Russian aircraft". No, I took no notice of that. But it sure fooled a lot of ruSSians - so much so they're still sore about it. Funny really. Really funny.
    1
  47.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "Ukraine had a massive army before the war". No it didn't. ruSSia had a massive army before the war - shame it was useless or they might have taken Ukraine.
    1
  48.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  I ask again, have you tried looking up the meaning of "fact"?
    1
  49.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "oil refineries were repaired no loss in fuel production". Lies. Some have been repaired, most are still off line. Loss in fuel production HUGE. "Bridge slightly damaged repaired in a few days" Lies. Road section of bridge repaired after several months. Rail section still awaiting repairs and unable to carry full loads. ruSSia was using ferries for heavy military equipment (like tanks) until Ukraine damaged all ferries. "One ship lost". Lies. 28 ruSSian navy ships of the BSF lost. "S400 destroyed around six units". Lies. Only a few replaced (by plundering other areas such as the Kuril Islands and Finnish border). "Infrastructure would be electric grid, telecommunications, command and control centres" - correct. Many damaged or destroyed. Or do you think Belgorod keeps losing power because they haven't paid their power bills?
    1
  50.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  Isn't it great that Ukraine has launched a Special Military Operation in Kursk to protect Ukrainian speakers and ethnic Ukrainians from nasti russians.
    1