Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "RFU News — Reporting from Ukraine" channel.

@yellowtunes2756 "400k according to who?" you ask, and then you spout this russian war propaganda "Ukraine lost half of it's population". According to who? Hypocrite.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "I don't like the fact that Russia attacked Ukraine, but it doesn't mean that they had no reason to do it". See that's exactly how you spread russian lies. russia had no justifiable reason to attack Ukraine. I'll repeat for those with slow understanding - russia had NO justifiable reason to attack Ukraine.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "What is so hypocritical about it?" You claimed above to dislike it when the strong attack the weak - yet here you are supporting the strong in their illegal, unjustifiable attack on a weaker nation. That is what is hypocritical.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "The longer Ukraine waits - the worse their situation will be". More false russian propaganda. More hypocritical support of the strong attacking the weak. The longer Ukraine waits the better their situation will be. Because at the time of the initial talks, russia controlled ~27% of Ukraine. Currently russia controls ~18% of Ukraine. Stop supporting the strong in their attacks on the weak with such lies.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "at the start of the war Russia was ok with discussing future of Donbas (not as part of Russia)" - but also not as part of Ukraine - even though it is Ukrainian land.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "while their main goal was to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO". Why? What business was it of russia what a sovereign nation does? Why would the stong (russia) want to attack the weak (Ukraine) when the weak was minding it's own business. Why do you support the strng attacking the weak when you claim to dislike that? Are you a hypocrite? There was no threat to russia if Ukraine joined NATO. Putin publicly stated in 2003 that he had no objection to the Baltic states joining NATO.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "Why am I the hypocrite because I want people to talk to each other and make peace?" No, you are a hypocrite because you want the strong (russia) to gain from attacking the weak (Ukraine) - while claiming otherwise.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "when I'm talking about Ukrainian bad deeds?" What Ukrainian "bad deeds"? And no russian propaganda in your reply, just balanced facts please.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "Btw, Ukraine lost half of it's population since the start of the war" - more russian propaganda. And those that have left, left because of russia's unjustifiable attacks on Ukraine. And you do know that the Ukrainian government recommended that women and children take refuge outside of Ukraine - due to russia striking civilians. So again you are being a hypocrite by supporting the the strong attacking the weak.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "Do you want people to stop dying or not?" Of course I do. And that can only happen if russia stops its aggression - but russia is unwilling to stop being aggressive. How many Ukrainians and russians is Putin willing to sacrifice to ensure that the 1991 borders (the only borders the world recognises) are not retaken.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "How many casualties aren't worth it?" Remember it's russia that is causing the casualties. How many Ukrainians and russians are YOU willing to sacrifice to ensure that the 1991 borders are not retaken?
1
@yellowtunes2756 "Russia has no reason to invade those countries because they are peaceful and aren't bombing civilians, thanks to Russia". Here you are again spreading untrue russian propaganda. You keep supporting the strong in its attacks on the weak. You keep supporting russia in it's attempted suppression of Ukraine. How many Ukrainians are you willing to sacrifice in your hypocritical support of the strong?
1
@yellowtunes2756 "It'd a person who acts in contradiction with his stated opinion/beliefs." You stated that you are against the strong attacking the weak - while at the same time supporting russia in it's attacks on a weaker Ukraine by trying to justify those attacks. That's EXACTLY the definition you describe above. So you are, by your own definition, a hypocrite.
1
@TrickShepherd As above.
1
@yellowtunes2756 "That's from the top of my head and it has nothing to do with ruzzia". Ah, wrong. It has everything too do with russia. Do you not know that russia sent provocateurs into Donbas to stir up dissension. Do you know that russia then armed those dissenters. Do you know that russia then sent in it's "little green men" into the Donbas to help the dissenters attack Ukrainian forces and institutions. That was all back in 2014. russia started this war. So it has EVERYTHING to do with russia.
1
@Slit-dl6gl Boris Johnson gave Zelensky very good advice.
1
@AbdulConteh-m8v "to go back to their former borders". You are talking rubbish. There are no border changes in eastern Europe. There are foreign NATO forces ONLY where they have been invited. There is no invasion. The only country invading anyone else in Europe is russia.
1
@AbdulConteh-m8v "Did the US lead NATO Alliance respect the agreements they signed with the Russians". Yes. Name one agreement they broke? russia, on the other hand, has a string of broken international agreements. I'll name one: The russo-Ukrainian Friendship Treaty, of 1997, in which russia agreed to Ukraine's sovereignty and to respect the 1991 borders of Ukraine. How's russia's adherence to that one looking?
1
@ledlight1487 "and is pretty much defunct now". Deluded russian fantasy. Ask the russia cannon-fodder on the front lines how defunct Ukraine is.
1
@mileskino8121 Not really. The borders between the former Yugoslavia and its neighbours have not changed. The changes are additional borders, all within the territory of the former Yugoslavia. And you say NATO did it? I don't think so!!! Most of the new nations broke away from the core of the former Yugoslavia without any external pressure. I believe NATO only got involved due to some of the atrocities committed by some of the factions (esp. Serbia - remember Srebrenica).
1
@Zorro33313 "Ukraine hadn't". Actually, yes it did. Ukraine had two free and fair elections, and a peaceful hand over of power in the previous 10 years. Of course russia has not had a free and fair election for a very long time - so it's government is not legitimate.
1
@mileskino8121 "serbia was just defending its national security by trying to retain there land". Well that's certainly not true. Serbia used force to try to retain every province of the former Yugoslavia, with the possible exception of Slovenia. That's not "just defending its national security", that's extending well beyond any reasonable form of defending itself. Add to that the terrible war crimes committed mostly by Serbia (remember Srebrenica) and Serbia has no cause to complain about anything they lost.
1
@WDLC1911 "Same for every other NATION". What a $tupid thing to say !!! I guess that makes russia Mongolian territory, or Kyivian, with parts Chinese.
1
@Zorro33313 lol Yup. Using WDLC's logic, that would make russian land Mongolian territory, or Kyivian, with parts Chinese.
1
@mileskino8121 "I literally cannot believe you just put the two together". Hey, forgive me if I can't remember all the details of the break up of Yugoslavia. You are the one who started this "whataboutism". The Kosovo situation doesn't seem right, but after the atrocities Serbia committed I have very little sympathy if they got screwed on Kosovo. I particularly remember Srebrenica.
1
@mileskino8121 "from the bombing of yugoslavia in 1999" There was no Yugoslavia in 1999. I literally cannot believe you just put the two together. Yugoslavia broke up in 1991-92.
1
@mileskino8121 "just shines a light on how i have no sympathy for the american police state". And yet you have sympathy for the russian Orc police state. Seems hypocritical don't you think.
1
@mileskino8121 I remember Srebrenica where Serbians massacred 5000-8000 unarmed men and boys - deliberately and in cold blood - in just a few days. This is a considerably higher number than died due to russian and Ukrainian hostilities in the Donbas over 8 years (3400). Yet you have the audacity to complain that Serbia was wronged.
1
@almacnaughton3688 Do you enjoy being ignored by your representative?
1
And... Dude, you know Stalin died in the 1950s, but russians still look up to him.
1
@yellowtunes2756 Stop with the dis-infomation vatnik.
1
@fabb5 You are really good at this "whataboutism" while deflecting from the fact that ruzzia is the fascist aggressor that is attacking Ukraine. By supporting ruzzian fascists you are the nazi supporter.
1
Not true. It is ruzzia that is attempting to bleed Ukraine dry (and failing). Why do you blame Ukraine for what Putin is causing?
1
ruzzia used 122 missiles and 36 drones in it's attack on Ukraine, resulting in the loss of 31 Ukrainian lives. Ukraine used 4 missiles in it's attack on Feodosia, resulting in the loss of 74 ruzzian troops, two ships, and a shipload of munitions. One estimate I saw put the value of the ruzzian missiles and drones at the equivilent of $1.2 billion US dollars. I think @romanpopyk's estimates of $200-300 million probably reflects his pro-ruzzian troll status (roman poppycock?).
1
@Saints1890 You are delusionary. You write complete rubbish. "Everyone knows Ukraine has lost the war" Yeah right. You silly misinformed ruSSian troll. I think everyone knows that ruSSia has failed to take Kyiv in the predicted three days (on day 671 that's very apparent). Russia has lost ships, multiple aircraft, 5000+ men and hundreds of armoured fighting vehicles in the last week alone. And all you can say is "Ukraine has lost the war" - I repeat: you are delusionary.
1
@QANews Hey QANews. I'm surprised you still believe that long debunked nonsense about "genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine" - as the only country conducting such genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine is ruSSia. ruSSian shelling and bombing has killed tens of thousands of ruSSian speakers and ethnic ruSSians in Mariupol alone, probably well over 100,000. And then there's the senseless slaughter of civilians by ruSSians in other parts of Eastern Ukraine. To enable the pursuit of self-determination in the Donbas region, ruSSia should contemplate GOING HOME in order to save lives - and to allow a free and fair, UN monitored referendum. Best regards.
1
@QANews Hey QANews. You don't represent the truth, because you are pushing ruSSian BS propaganda about fictitious "genocidal activities in Eastern Ukraine" Best regards.
1
@QANews Hey QANews. No he's right, you wouldn’t know the truth if it smacked you in the face. The proof is in the ruSSian disinformation you have already posted in this comments section. Warm regards.
1
@Jerry-6947 Sorry to say this but you're wrong. Russia is losing. The Ukrainian army brought the Russian army to a halt twelve months ago. The Russian army has been unable to take any significant Ukrainian land since that time. Not so much as one city, nothing, nada, zilch. Over the same twelve months the Ukrainian army has liberated over 18,000sq km of Ukraine - including six cities. Over 30% of Russian held territory - inclusive of Crimea - has been won back from the invaders. That's called "Ukraine winning", you silly Russian troll.
1