Comments by "wvu05" (@wvu05) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder"
channel.
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@44hawk28 If there is evidence of all of this malfeasance, why do Trump's lawyers admit that there isn't when they are in a place where they can't lie? You can lie to Tucker Carlson with impunity, but not a judge.
And how could someone lose when they are several points ahead in several key states on Election Night? Let's use a little simple logic. Many states had Republican legislatures that refused to let counties begin the count of absentee and mail-in voting until Election Day (my adopted home state of Pennsylvania even had the governor ask the legislature to pass a law to allow them to open the ballots early to speed up the count, but they refused to even do that). One side is being encouraged to vote by mail, and the other side insists that voting by mail is a scam. Of course, the vast majority of those who vote by mail will be on that side (in Pennsylvania, where this was the first election with no excuse absentee voting, nearly 80% of all mail-in votes were for Biden, and he won mail-in votes in all 67 counties despite only winning 13 counties overall), and when that is nearly half of the vote, it's not a stretch of the imagination at all.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@dcaseng What "Medicare for All movement"? What have you actually done to build support for Medicare for All? Facebook comments don't count.
And all those marches that were supposed to make this big splash? I am on multiple mailing lists for the sponsors in Philadelphia, and I never heard a thing about it until someone complained that Nina Turner would have an event ten days before her election, so now she's a sellout, too.
And AOC changed her position because she realized that it was counterproductive. She probably wasn't familiar with the tactic of Catch and Release, which completely invalidates show votes as a strategy. There were one of three possible results in relation to the sponsor list:
1) The list matched the vote and confirmed what we already knew.
2) The Soft Yes members become Hard No, thus meaning that we are now farther away from passage.
3) Catch and Release is invoked, and the members in lefty districts who oppose it vote Yes to fend off a primary challenge. Then, if it ever actually has a chance of becoming law, they'll vote No, thus meaning that you are opening yourself to snakes in the grass.
That's the difference between AOC and Dore. She learns and adjusts accordingly. And she didn't support the candidate who called Medicare for All "un-American" in an interview with Anderson Cooper multiple times in the same interview, so it was no slip of the tongue.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11