Comments by "uguysrnuts" (@UguysRnuts) on "Salty Cracker" channel.

  1. Murder??? Not manslaughter??? You think Petgrave was deliberately trying to take Johnson's life??? I'm a "real Canadian" and I think Petgrave should be charged with manslaughter and sentenced accordingly, including incarceration and a lifetime ban from organized sport.
    18
  2. There is not a single mention of "adrenochrome" in this movie. Why is it in the title of this video?
    15
  3.  @lindarock4128  Put up or shut up. If anyone can back up the mob accusations with real evidence let them. I hope they convict. But if he's innocent, the only thing he can do is sue. If we're so gung ho on JUSTICE it behooves us to be honest.
    15
  4.  @Anubis_Moon  You're 100% right. What a world we live in.
    14
  5. Wait! I saw it yesterday. Adrenachrome wasn't mentioned once! What is going on here?
    12
  6. Funny how truth tellers make a video about Adrenachrome and Sound of Freedom when there is absolutely NO mention of "adrenachrome" in Sound of Freedom???
    11
  7. Funny how "adrenachrome" is in clickbait title when it is never mentioned in the actual movie???
    10
  8. Title mentions CNN in panic about "Adrenachrome" yet there is nothing about adrenachrome in Sound of Freedom movie??? WTF is going on here?
    9
  9.  @kelf114  I did. Yesterday. Even stayed for the bonus message after the credits. How else would I have known the word "adrenochrome" was never mentioned in the entire movie? How about you?
    8
  10. Not if the destination wasn't Little St James.
    8
  11. Have YOU seen any proof? I didn't think so.
    7
  12.  @ilikedabeans9971  Do YOU have any kinda proof or just consider it unnecessary?
    5
  13.  @MrBubba19692  Great. Sooner the better. I personally will withhold judgement until then.
    5
  14. How would you react to a mob of accusers with not a lick of evidence?
    5
  15. The title says it's against mentioning 'Adrenachrome' which has NOTHING to do with this movie. Adrenachrome is never mentioned in Sound of Freedom. Some fuckery in play here.
    5
  16.  @earthmama9597  I watched that interview. Don't recall the "witch doctor" part, but you're right, he has talked about adrenochrome. Funny it was completely excluded from the movie?
    5
  17.  @ilikedabeans9971  No actually, it's the only type of reaction he's got. If someone has proof of guilt, bring it. It's not up to Carrey to prove a negative.
    4
  18.  @jimpemberton1543  We will see. I tend to think he might be telling the truth. He sure would lose any and all credibility if so much as a single witness came forth to validate such an accusation.
    4
  19.  @jonnyboy5357  Every year tens of thousands of suits are prosecuted for slander. It is the only remedy available in a democratic system and in no way indicates either guilt or innocence. The only thing that can determine what is true is a law suit and that's why Carrey has chosen the option.
    4
  20.  @szlava3641  Interesting conclusion. I can't disagree with you as to racial bias. The villains in the movie are almost entirely of the same ethnic minority.
    4
  21. The truth may be "I do not beat my wife", but it's no defence in the court of public opinion. He has no choice.
    4
  22. It does seem that way these days.
    4
  23. There was no mention of "adrenachrome" in 'Sound of Freedom'.
    4
  24.  @demonlordomegaacepilot7090  The flight log to where is the question. The reason "nothing will come of it" is because, If it's not to the USVI then it's NOT evidence of being to LSJ.
    4
  25. The title says CNN in a panic about "Adrenachrome" yet there is no mention of adrenachrome ANYWHERE in 'Sound of Freedom'!!! Something very odd in play here.
    4
  26.  @JoeyJr702  Jim Carrey can hardly be considered to be "lawyering up" when he already has them on retainer and uses their services on a daily basis.
    3
  27.  @annamarie2754  Fortunately it takes more than "would anyone really be shocked" in a court of law.
    3
  28.  @Ask-Jesus-for-the-Holy-Spirit  Not for a second. The amount of data it contained would be impossible to fake.
    3
  29.  @A_Stereotypical_Heretic  Um...... he made a single call to his lawyer. How is that an "overreaction"? You do realize the picture Salty chose was of him in one of his roles, don't you?
    3
  30.  @77SilentAssassin77  It's not even that. It's the standard and only defence against slander.
    3
  31. Cuties is a Netflix production. You know Netflix? The place where the Obamas were hired as "producers".
    3
  32. Something fishy going on here. Sound of Freedom does not mention anything about "adrenachrome", so why would salty put it in the title???
    3
  33. You're right, there was absolutely no suggestion of even the EXISTENCE of adrenachrome in 'Sound of Freedom'.
    3
  34. Though the subject is important and the message about Paedophilia needs to get out to the normies, I found the movie itself was mediocre. I don't regret seeing it and am happy to support a movement to expose child trafficking but I did not learn anything new and was disappointed by how narrow in scope was the subject matter. There was very little about actual paedophilia as it manifests itself amongst the immoral elite in North America and in fact, Caviezel himself has a line that I found highly deceptive, when asked how many children he'd actually freed; he says "most of the children involved were outside of the United States". What about the millions that have gone missing WITHIN the USA???
    3
  35.  @timetravelerify  If he can be proved to be lying about simply visiting Little Saint James it's going to make defending himself against charges of Pedophilia infinitely more difficult. If he's guilty, he'd be a fool to risk all credibility on something so easily disproved.
    3
  36.  @deusvult9349  You cared enough to delete your comment though, didn't you? As if that will save you.
    3
  37. No you didn't. You saw his name on the flight log of the Lolitta Express, but that doesn't mean he flew to Little St. James. Our fight for justice is in vain if we have to lie to achieve it.
    3
  38. What was the "corruption" exposed in 'Sound of Freedom'?
    3
  39. Unless someone actually uses the tickets you bought, you're not spreading the message.
    2
  40. I have no problem with a film exposing child trafficking but there was NOTHING in this film I didn't already know about and TONS MORE THEY COMPLETELY OMITTED!!! Like what about all the kiddie diddlers within the USA, especially the one who took his laptop in for repairs and never picked it up!
    2
  41.  @arlaghdoth4434  You're right. It's all part of the plan. Introduce unfounded absurdity and get all the NPC's on board with it so when It's proven false everything, gets thrown out including the many true crimes the evil overlords are trying to get away with. Thanks for the support.
    2
  42.  @Ask-Jesus-for-the-Holy-Spirit  I think you've taken a few too many kicks to the head there son. If you want to be taken seriously I suggest you proofread your word salads and try to make coherent sentences out of them.
    2
  43. Odd that "adrenachrome" is in title yet not in the movie whatsoever???
    2
  44. The money helps.
    2
  45. There is no mention of adrenochrome ANYWHERE in 'Sound of Freedom'.
    2
  46. Funny how you're the only one here, besides myself, who mention this fact?
    2
  47. There's more it doesn't mention than that which it does. I think people are being hoodwinked.
    2
  48.  @ryanscottnix  I used to love Salty too. Now I check in occasionally to monitor the current state of the flock.
    2
  49. You think they don't know that?
    2
  50.  @suesally2103  From what. Calmly calling his Lawyers and telling them to take care of it?
    2