Comments by "uguysrnuts" (@UguysRnuts) on "Salty Cracker" channel.

  1.  @SidewaysBurnouts  Epstein was exfiltrated from the USA, but you're not allowed to consider that. We have been presented with a false dichotomy, either he committed suicide or was murdered, when all indications are him being returned to headquarters.
    2
  2.  @Ask-Jesus-for-the-Holy-Spirit  You're right, the "guilty" do not threaten to sue. The innocent, however, do. Thanks for proving my case. LOL!!!
    2
  3. Instilling the insatiable lust for mammon was a pretty good one too.
    2
  4. Something wrong here. Adrenachrome is not mentioned in 'Sound of Freedom', ever! Why is it in title???
    2
  5. On the way out I was asked by AMC staff about the temperature and I replied that I never noticed it being hot or cold which means it was perfect. All the theatres are connected by a forty foot long hallway with the movie title on the wall outside. If you couldn't figure it out, you have issues.
    2
  6.  @DemonratPoison  Riiiight, Scott Rose, that's why I went and saw 'Sound of Freedom' yesterday.
    2
  7. @piphudson8232 Okay. Not sure what your point is. All I'm making note of is the staff at my AMC made sure the temperature was comfortable, going so far as to solicit my opinion. If it wasn't I'd tell them and have them make it right. I've done it several times in the past as recently as a month ago. It happens, regardless of the movie's subject. And if not I'd demand a refund. No idea what the big deal is. Some people, make that most sheeple don't know how to speak up.
    2
  8.  @MephiticMiasma  People are so terrified of being called 'conspiracy theorists' they are unable to recognize actual conspiracies, even when they're surrounded by them!
    2
  9.  @crimadellaphone9374  Please, go on. It struck me as strange that he went to the trouble of explaining why we weren't going to see his videos on YT and then this comes out the next day.
    2
  10.  @orenmontgomery8250  So you're thanking "Jim" for "spreading the word" based on absolutely nothing whatsoever??? Rhetorical question. Just following the mob.
    2
  11. As well as triggering the ignorant mob who wouldn't know a child predator from a president.
    2
  12. So, by your logic, the tens of thousands of people who sue for slander are all guilty. Do you have any idea how completely idiotic such a claim makes you look?
    2
  13. And not one of those 86,000 children is represented in this movie which would have you believe the molestation only happens in third world countries.
    1
  14. There is absolutely NO mention of "adrenachrome" in 'Sound of Freedom' and the druggies who use it are not necessarily paedophiles. They use it to get high, not to have sex with children. Some serious conflation deliberately being introduced here in a clickbait title.
    1
  15.  @stevewhite8178  Could be, but I lean towards it really existing. We do know there are drugs out there produced from aborted fetus' and cosmetics made from the foreskins of circumcised Korean babies (we saw it explained on several TV shows including 'Ellen Generis'). Not much of a stretch to extrapolate the theory to include adrenochrome.
    1
  16.  @datapusher-  How about........ Nuooooo.
    1
  17.  @timlewis7218  Prove it.
    1
  18.  @jamesriver3745  Prove it.
    1
  19.  @hammerhand5059  Prove it.
    1
  20.  @smith1958b  Prove it.
    1
  21.  @archetypesmith9435  Prove it.
    1
  22.  @FXDLJAY805  Prove it.
    1
  23.  @Aatagalugaming  Prove it.
    1
  24.  @paullegge6362  Prove it.
    1
  25.  @Curtis.Carpenter  Prove it.
    1
  26.  @stevenStampper  Prove he went there even once.
    1
  27.  @HowardFBeale  Big talk from a nobody.
    1
  28.  @blix8111  Prove it.
    1
  29.  @johnpad4778  Prove it.
    1
  30.  @skitzcunt4213  Should be easy to prove then, you'd think. Funny how no one can.
    1
  31.  @wonyankeesays5661  Said no lawyer ever.
    1
  32.  @Fordgroup00  Don't let that stop you, the mob's got a bone in it's teeth.
    1
  33.  @Jizzlewobbwtfcus  Check your sources.
    1
  34.  @LILBANKSN502  What you "don't got" is principles, ethics and common sense, not to mention literacy.
    1
  35.  @srb2591  It's unanimous then. The illiterate all agree.
    1
  36.  @smith1958b  "Come on man"??? You quoting Briden?  What makes you think Carrey is "so fearful"? Just because influencers like Salty are embellishing the story with inflammatory language and pics, false claims, and totally made up lies doesn't mean Carrey's in any way "freaking out". When someone like him, who's brand is at stake, wants to deal with a slander issue he calls his law firm. It's not overreacting, it's responding in the only way possible.  It doesn't protect him from being found guilty down the road. In fact, it makes things worse if we find out he has been to LSJ island after all. Any further testimony would be regarded as equally false. This is a Lynch mob trying to convict him in the court of public opinion where proof doesn't matter. The YouTuber he served notice on isn't going to have any effect on an actual trial and he wasn't "attacked", to the contrary, it's Brand Carrey that stands to lose here, not some unheard of YouTuber. If there's actual photographic proof of Carrey, and let's face it, that's what the mission Epstein was assigned to carry out was after, then he will be convicted. Lynch mobs like Salty's army of zombies will have no effect on the outcome, just on his income. In fact, they're only hurting themselves by allowing themselves to be deluded with propaganda and other deception.  When the truth comes out, sobeit, I'll be calling for maximum prosecution ESPECIALLY if he's lying about knowing Epstein, but I'm not going to throw in with a bunch of rabid imbeciles to assassinate someones character without legitimate proof.
    1
  37.  @Liu-Kang-Xi  True indeed. He's been a real 'ass ho'!!! His appearance on Kimmel doing his "Illumanutty" symbol was aids, his movie's suck (with the one exception of The Truman Show), he's prolly tweaked out of his brain even. If he's FN with kids he's toast. I think we'll know, soon enough and I wait with bated breath for what's coming. My "knowledge and involvement", as you term it, is not slight.
    1
  38.  @timlewis7218  His rights. His character sucks.
    1
  39.  @timlewis7218  Gossip does not include accusations of crimes. I've read the Pilot's Log as much as I'm able and can't find any reference to Jim Carrey let alone him flying to STX or STT or any other destination in the Virgin Islands, but please, if you've seen the Log, please provide the flight number and I'll look it up.
    1
  40.  @timlewis7218  I'm sure you'd feel differently if you were the person being falsely accused of a heinous crime.
    1
  41.  @timlewis7218  Hopefully not in that order.
    1
  42.  @timlewis7218  You would appreciate Victor Ostrovsky's biography, "By Way of Deception" in which he describes Epstein's brownstoning operation to a tee.
    1
  43.  @timlewis7218  It was written thirty years ago. The M have been running this OP for a long time.
    1
  44.  @ImThePronounPolice  You saw who where and they "told you" what?
    1
  45. Until it's been refined into adrenochrome.
    1
  46.  @Ask-Jesus-for-the-Holy-Spirit  I believe that to be a true statement. There is no evidence Trump set foot on Little Saint James Island.
    1
  47.  @Soundwave32791  The funny thing is, you used to like Carrey, but now you're disappointed because you've decided he's guilty of child molestation, despite not having a single piece of evidence, whereas I've never cared for his comedy, suspect him of being a Freemason and Satanist, but still have to consider him innocent until proven otherwise. I'm confident we're going to find out one way or the other, sooner, rather than later and I must confess, it would be somewhat disappointing if it turns out he's pedo as I did kind of enjoy The Truman Show, though I wouldn't consider that comedy. More like a nightmare., but what isn't these days?
    1
  48.  @Ask-Jesus-for-the-Holy-Spirit  There is no such thing as an "Epstein Island list". there is a phone book and a flight log, neither of which is a "list of pedophiles" as you so blithely claim.
    1
  49.  @Sadiqoflondonistan  No, it would be like Clinton saying he will sue anyone that says he had "sexual relations with that woman". That's a huge difference lost on the low IQ.
    1
  50.  @jonnyboy5357  Clearly, you not only know SFA about law but lack even the common sense God gave you. If it can be proved he simply visited the island and has been lying about that, then he loses all credibility in defending himself from accusations of pedophilia. Think about it. Don't respond with more uneducated drivel. Try to stifle your reactions long enough to comprehend what I'm telling you.
    1