Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Secular Talk" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 4
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. " It's not really that asinine when you think about it. The republicans are actively pushing agendas that will decimate the planet for our posterity(climate change denial, nuclear proliferation). " They do not deny climate change. They feel this 1. They question how much is man playing a role, which is a great question 2.They question if it is even bad, which is also a great question. Remember, the ecosystem does evolve. 3. They feel the government is not the source to solve this issue, scientists are " You say you're a scientist ( I somehow don't believe you) thats fine and all just know that 99% of the scientific community disagrees with your assesment on global warming." That 99% stat has been both debunked and presented improperly numerous times. What I listed above is the actual science. There is a reason why you are not having scientists in congress making radical statements like Noam Chomsky and Bernie Sanders are. If you understand science you will understand how little we know. We do not even know the physics behind photosynthesis. What makes you think we can make strong conclusion about climate change and the evolution of the ecosystem? "You seem to have a really black and white surface level analysis of things." Actually it is the exact opposite. You are siding with the crowd of "climate change is bad and we must do something" where I am with the scientists of "there is a lot of doubt, and we need more research before we make radical decisions that will harm our economy". "Also, what did you find mediocre about manufacturing consent, care to tell me any specific parts of the book you found mundane?" It repeated itself over and over again. You can make the point in around 100 pages. "Dont kid yourselves people, its idiotic to even try and compare Chomsky to Shapiro, its a disgrace tbh." Why not? They both have doctorates. They both have written books. They are both intelligent and intellectuals. Just because you disagree with Shapiro does not mean he is not on the same level as Chomsky. I disagree with a lot of people but view them as intelligent. I disagree with Robert Reich but I view him as intelligent. I just feel that politics has poisoned his great mind. I disagree with Richard Dawkins but view him as a great mind. I feel his push of atheism and his unjustified hatred towards religion and god believers ruined him. I still view him as an intellectual though. "Chomsky is a national treasure, Ben shapiro is some dweeb who debates culture wars with college kids." You can believe that if you want. I feel projection here. Intellectuals disagree all the time. How you disagree is key.
    4
  39. 4
  40. 4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4