Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Secular Talk"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Beyond Fables, to start there is no clear definition of a "assault rifle". Having a hand grip, which actually makes the gun safer, can make a gun a "assault rifle". Next, many people own guns for sport, why take that away from them? What is the use of drinking alcohol? Many get drunk, drive, kill, beat people, etc. What good comes from alcohol? To me it is relaxing. To some shooting is relaxing. Finally, gun ownership is a fundamental right to control the government. While the chances are low we will have to fight tyranny, the option should always exist. It is why we still have nukes, other countries have it so we should always have it just in case.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
" It's not really that asinine when you think about it. The republicans
are actively pushing agendas that will decimate the planet for our
posterity(climate change denial, nuclear proliferation). "
They do not deny climate change. They feel this
1. They question how much is man playing a role, which is a great question
2.They question if it is even bad, which is also a great question. Remember, the ecosystem does evolve.
3. They feel the government is not the source to solve this issue, scientists are
" You say you're a scientist ( I somehow don't believe you) thats fine
and all just know that 99% of the scientific community disagrees with
your assesment on global warming."
That 99% stat has been both debunked and presented improperly numerous times. What I listed above is the actual science. There is a reason why you are not having scientists in congress making radical statements like Noam Chomsky and Bernie Sanders are. If you understand science you will understand how little we know. We do not even know the physics behind photosynthesis. What makes you think we can make strong conclusion about climate change and the evolution of the ecosystem?
"You seem to have a really black and white surface level analysis of things."
Actually it is the exact opposite. You are siding with the crowd of "climate change is bad and we must do something" where I am with the scientists of "there is a lot of doubt, and we need more research before we make radical decisions that will harm our economy".
"Also, what did you find mediocre about manufacturing consent, care to tell me any specific parts of the book you found mundane?"
It repeated itself over and over again. You can make the point in around 100 pages.
"Dont kid yourselves people, its idiotic to even try and compare Chomsky to Shapiro, its a disgrace tbh."
Why not? They both have doctorates. They both have written books. They are both intelligent and intellectuals. Just because you disagree with Shapiro does not mean he is not on the same level as Chomsky. I disagree with a lot of people but view them as intelligent. I disagree with Robert Reich but I view him as intelligent. I just feel that politics has poisoned his great mind. I disagree with Richard Dawkins but view him as a great mind. I feel his push of atheism and his unjustified hatred towards religion and god believers ruined him. I still view him as an intellectual though.
"Chomsky is a national treasure, Ben shapiro is some dweeb who debates culture wars with college kids."
You can believe that if you want. I feel projection here.
Intellectuals disagree all the time. How you disagree is key.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@zachthamm9595 I disagree with you on Trump voters as I am one myself. I can easily argue those that opposed him have been brainwashed by the media and have TDS. But I will not get into that. I will say my distrust is based on
1. How many government officials, mainly democrats, enforced these rules but did not follow them themselves. Such as Newsom, or Lightfoot getting a hair cut, or Pelosi getting a hair cut, or Steve Adler telling people not to travel but saying it from his time share home in Mexico, or recently how Mayor deBlasio told us peasants not to visit Time Square on NYE so him, his wife and some friends can enjoy it without us.
2. How much the narrative change from going to deaths, to only cases, to it was only supposed to last 2 weeks, now the vaccine is going slow so we have to wait longer to now a new strain is out
3. How many experts were censored but ones like Fauci weren't. He has been fear mongering the entire time, but when asked about Biden he was cheering on Biden's plan and saying under him things will get better which is a pure political stance he took
There are more but those are three main ones. We have been liked to by the elites in our society and while average people like me suffer, the elites enjoy their lives.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4