Comments by "Tomas Vrabec" (@tomasvrabec1845) on "KaiserBauch" channel.

  1. It's saddening that he makes an objective video but the comments are absolutely ideological. People here seem to see Brasils crime and economics as a result of their racial mixing. That's toxic and Americanism. Brasils success has little to do with it's modern racial structures. This is even more evident as Brasil was better off without American categorisation which always causes spikes in racism. Eg they see Kamala Harris as Black, where as many Europeans would barely see her as Brown and would even call her white in many cases (akin to Spaniards or Italians).
    230
  2. ​ @georgios_5342  that's bit weird. When I was younger I would often see pregnant women even in ther Kate months outside. They went for walks (as one put it... It is a small walk and more sitting outside). I would see them in town centers holding their belly and reading news or magazines, I would see them in parks where they would somethimes just watch kids of various ages interact... Or just be in nature.
    66
  3. ​ @diogo7905  the thing is easily explainable. With the use of policies of Workers. USSR had many towns and cities where they shipped Russians and some other Rus people's such as Belarusians and Ukrainians. These were towns orientated around specific labours. Most skilled labourers were russian. Hence Russian ethnicity was spread under the Workers sentiments. Additionally, Russian was the go to language, hence why the Russification meant that general institution demanded the use of Russian to get anything done. Hence eroding natives in the east and Russifing the Asiatic Russia. Essentially. Yes all ethnic labels were taken down in pursuit of a new Soviet label. However the Soviet label was predominantly and very heavily taken out of Russian cultural context as it was led through Russian ethic majority. Thus it was more of a rebranding of Russian Cultural identity and making it easier to sell to other ethic groups... Because "it does not enforce Russian.. it's a new one, made for us all- just basically made out of Russian"
    37
  4. Thanks for the useless comment which summarises the Author of this Video's point of view and conclusion...
    36
  5. ​ @ZAMAKOVO  yeah. Besides certain parts of actual way of thinking I do think one is from Eastern Europe, the other is American. So I often saw them more reasonable for American oriented content, but then saw so many .. dno what to call it... From wrong stuff to just either ignoring or having no clue about the underlying cultural contexts
    28
  6. "capabilities" based on race is a gross myth. Capabilities is something gained by education...
    26
  7. I know yoh are more on the demographics side but it would be interesting if you could look into the Duch multipilar cultural society compared to others. Essentially. Their policy was that the state had to fund migrant cultural aspects of life and not just the duch ones. They had to built or fund masques or other worship places. Fund the education in mofrant languages.. ex ex. Essentially... Did everything which orevents assimilation into the local culture... And funded it by the state.
    23
  8. ​ @TearThatRedFlagDown  "our" makes no sense here. No one knows where you are...
    23
  9. ​ @OGrandomunknownperson  people relate to their home countries even in a single-race society.... It's very common you know. Pole, Slovak, Czech, German or French living in the UK always refer to their home countries and compare things even after 30 years of residency.
    20
  10. How would you describe them over all. You said they are pro Ukraine but what about other opponions. LGBT, other alliances, economic outlook (desire to have more trade elsewhere) or language policies? I as as I myself send to describe myself as Progressive Traditionalist (eh I am pro choice, I am accepting of Gays (I am one heh) even though I myself have no clear option the deeper LGBT stuff (general don't care much but observe it). I personally want traditions to be around, even religion in many forms, thought I believe many need to adapt to suit modern values.
    20
  11. I would not say it was Germany per say. The Slavs that were assimilated were... Slavs. All slavs have a tendency to quickly adapt the others culture and assimilate within one generation especially with incentives.
    19
  12. That's because the English countryside is usually the more Posh and middle class living where as the Urban areas are more crowded and less traditional (I mean evolved traditional - eg no one has issues with gays as they are no different in their lifestyle than any other people, but anyone with a family simply prefers to live outside of urban areas)
    18
  13. For the demographics of Poland. How much do you reckon will immigrantion into Poland better Poland. I mean east European immigrants. As due to the well prevention of Poland and it's similarities to the rest of counties might make people assimilate and take on Polish culture more than any other immigration
    17
  14. It's not fear mothering. He isn't stating it as some conspiracy. He states it as the Facts and Data state it. 1. Religious groups tend to have higher birth rate and retention of culture. This in Atheistic Europe with low birth rate, and hight immigration with high Religiosity (and birth rate) will over time cause a demographic ethnic change. Eh. Britain went from 94% British to 74% in leads than 30 years. This has nothing to do with race tho, as stated, it's about culture, ideas, ideology and understanding of the society of the country where large influence of people from non democracies and from regions with vastly different value systems will inevitably affect the democraticy of the country they move into. Descendants of migrants don't tend to harbour any form of patriotism be it showed in Democratic care, general care fro the area nor if it came to the defence of the country in case of an attack. Hence even stated in the vide that even Emigration from Ukraine into Poland is not a good thing long term wise (talking decades). These are long term goals which are needed in Europe to have a functioning democracies which is someone Americans rarely understand. You often connect these demographic things with Nazis and their Nationalism... Meanwhile forgoing the fact that it was Nationalism, The threat of Outside and the continuation Ethic and linguistic erosion of the region which made the brand of Eastern Nationasim... Which developed and established Nation States. Meanwhile akin ideas when put onto Imperial powers such as Germany, Britain or even the Ottomans harbour danger where they connect it to their Imperialism Glory and this it just another extension of such Imperial Glory.
    15
  15. Sure. Keep believing that gay rights have any effect on fertility rate ... (They don't). Gay right are not even controversial in the UK and are accepted by all parties left and right. It works, it doesn't have to be discussed. And traditions evolve.. hence why Anglican church accepts gay marriage and openly gay priests. The only topic that's questioned is Trans, which itself has almost nothing to do with gays.
    15
  16. ​@Wendeta-hq2cp MEGA is not even a thing...
    14
  17. The difference goes as far as the 6th century. As stated. It's the Germania-Slavica. East Germany was largely composed of Slavic peoples who were replaced or heavily incorporated into the "German" nation (quotations as it was not unified Germany as we know). The Polabian Slavs such as Sorbs are still around but they were assimilated (by force and without a force) into German language, culture and politics. But the divide is still there. And historic echoes tend to reinforce it - Catholics Vs protestants. Prussia Vs the rest. Iron curtain.
    13
  18. ​ @kaiserbauch9092  from what I keep hearing it's akin to the the other great empires. France gets migration from countries that were in its empire, Portugal gets it from Brazil, UK from Africa and India. I would say it's mainly linguistics.
    13
  19.  @GrosPointRouge  Actually... My comment at least informs you that you managed to summarise this view. Without it copying the video nor trying to create some sort of moral point which was talked about anyway. The topic even being concentrated around the problems of Mass Migration rather than pure migration as it talks about rate of migration and rate of assimilation, with an underlying contextual differences affecting these rates. The legalism or illegalism of migration becomes increasingly null with the rate being so high... As measures are need to limit even legal migration (thus by default affecting illegal migration).
    12
  20. The Hungarian attitude is the Slavic attitude when it comes to it. It's common this way in Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia and Ukraine. The Baltics are like it too. Tbh, apparently this has been somewhat of an old cultural trend where Slavic and protoslavic cultures were in the middle of the plains and thus mixed a lot. Being similar with your neighbours but different also naturally leads to this attitude. Even Russia has it... Be it mixed with an imperial tradition (meaning that they force it on conquered lands, whereas the latter Slavic nations didn't expand much)
    12
  21. Well. It even ironic what you read about Slavic history and Christianisation. Slavs were a decentralised tribal democracy akin to the native Americans and resided in Europe for 1000/1500 years before 5/6th century CE. Rome kept the region around as they were peaceful and non problematic, meanwhile they fought the Germanic and Celtic peoples more west. Rome fell. The Franko-Germanic states be it East Frankis empire or Later HRE then expend east around 5/6th century. Sonia, Byzantium also went north... And the Horde came from the east. It's said that Slavs centralised due to external threat where the clans were unified under a leading clan in order to defend from external attacks. Centralisation of Slavs mirrors the periods of attacks a lot. Especially that of Poland which united a fair amount of Slavic Tribes.
    12
  22. ​ @artilleryman895  it also showed the special phenomenon of Hungary. It was an oppressed nation but also the oppressor. Hence you can see their reaction as both where they still go towards claims of other nations but also act as one of the victims. Mixed mentality
    12
  23. 😂 You speak of Population Numbers... Not population make up. Russian empire indeed had less people.... But the people were younger and had more kids. Today's Russia has the largest population it ever had, and the smallest area it had ... But it's population is old. The average Russian is 40.3 years old. The Russian state runs one of the most hefty pension systems (which depends on constant population growth). Which is why Russia is heading for collapse, because it's ratio of yound to old is too great, because it does not have the technological ability to mitigate these effects and because it is a multinational federation where... Once it's core starts to fall, it's not hard to see the others trying to flee a sinking ship
    11
  24. ​ @kittytrail  Sad to break it to you but this whole Chanel is dedicated to... A Social Science.
    11
  25. Nowadays? It's an old term and they have a lot in common. It a simple termand from the 1800s which first meant Jews that converted to Christianity. Later it became a term for the unified life of Jews and Christians in middle of the 1900s. Meaning that Jews and Christians can coexist. Nowadays it just splits Islam from the Abrahamic religions and means that it Christian and Judean ideal. It's less about religious boundaries and more about cultural influence stemming out of the religions.
    11
  26. ​ @NightinGal89  And this is why the men that actually have a female partner and have a great relationship and understanding with them are the ones with more kids in a modern society. Literally every single woman of such man seems to want kids. My partner's sister wants kids and she is 24 about to get married, our friend is due soon at 25/26 and want more kids. The understanding solves the social issue. The only issues left are the economic and environmental. Heck. Even I as a gay man want kids and I used to want to have loads of kids (7) though unaffordable. We already had plenty of women tell us they would "carry for us". Which felt weird.
    11
  27. European and Homogenous is not comparable when you talk about... Europe. That's like calling East Asia fully Homogenous... Or the whole of Africa. I get that what you mean may differ, but you are grossly misusing the term.
    10
  28. That image is nowhere near the time stamp and the quote... It's at 1:04 and the quote is "in which oligarchy may replace democracy" As that's what happened in ancient Greece.
    10
  29.  @DungeonMarshal  I mean they have a small population but far more productive population than Russia. They have higher birth rate than Russia and a lower demographic decline than Russia. Russia runs on pensions and pensioners.. it's bound to collapse
    10
  30. ​ @pjotrnygard1447 russian white fertility rate is bellow 1.5. there is a fair amount of European countries that have higher fertility rate than that, and most of them are 95% white...
    9
  31. Jordan was part of the mandate of Palestine.... Jordan essentially was the Arab part of Palestine.... Hence why they have so many Palestinians
    8
  32. As stated here. Until 2001 the birth rate was higher in SVK. Then similar. After that, Slovak birth rate went down. Reason is rather simple - Slovakia is worse off hence far more of the younger and able migrate abroad - and mainly migrate into Czechia. That's since 2004. 20 years later - a one Generational circle in Theory, Slovak birth rate is smaller because the Population within Reproductive Age migrated out. Whilst this would likely boost Czech birth rates by the same amount that Slovakia lost it's (more or less). Which seems to align.
    8
  33. Here where I a gay man told people that I want kids.. they ask why and I say: 1. So that I am not alone in old age, 2. So that someone can take care of me when I am old,3. So that I am a part of some innate community (wider family often is). They said that's stupid and even evil. Then proceeded to school me regarding why you should have kids... Stating thing like affording to be able to go with them on Holliday's and so on as necessary. It just seemed weird to me, and from those points on clear to me, that it's not even tied to being liberal or being LGBT or being a man or a woman... None of that matters as each and every group went on about money, then reflecting on their own struggles where their own parents were no enough- mostly financially... To me that's weird. I am a Slovak and I grew up in largely very traditional family full of many catholics and military personnel (yet, neither care much wther I am gay or not- rare but they don't.. ). And even though I am a gay man, through their traditional mindsets (mixed with progressive views), even I still want kids and a family l, and aim in life "to be old grandpa that farms, gardens, helps with grandkids and all"... As I honestly don't see point in living and life without that goal. I might get excited at the thought of travels, especially as I love vernacular architecture, folklore and love learning and exploring these cultural parts from around the world... But even then my mind wonders to "but what then when I am old?". Even my damn catholic grandparents push towards me having kids, if possible (mind you), and they don't care if it's biological or adopted.
    8
  34. ​ @vh5663 Ethnically Czechs are not that related to Austrians... That a given fact. Also, just because someone promotes cultural kingship doesn't mean they are immediately some sort of Pan-slavist in the 20th century sense of the word.... It's as if you ignored all the videos on this channel because you can't understand the pattern on them... Cultural kingship is the entire point of these videos... Hence the mentions of assimilation, cooperation and coordination. Hence the mentions of migrants that are non problematic and problematic..... The more akin, the more friendly, the more it works....
    8
  35. Central yes but Czech east is also nominally poorer than the west (Bohemia Vs Moravia). But Czechia also has sudets which became desolated after expulsions.
    8
  36. Not surprised. The dialectal continuum was almost perfect prior to 1800s. After 1850s it split between Czech and Slovak a LOT due to the standardisation. Hence Moravian declined and standardised Czech (based more in Bohemian Czech) rose up. Meanwhile Slovak, based more on Central and western dialects rose in slovakia, and the regional dialects declined. Even today, a lot of Slovaks from center to west struggle to understand Eastern Slovaks but have no problem with Czech language or even the most Western Czech dialects.
    7
  37. ​​ @poonczey That's your personal perspective. Not a fact for everyone individually. My grandparents loved Czechoslovakia and unity with Czechs... My great grandparents also supported Czechslovakia. Heck my great grandfather who was a Slovak partisan during the war also supported the union... Equally my father also supports the union despite being within Slovak armed forces. They are all from different parts of my family and all are from North of Slovakia. Quite frankly even within Slovakia I could always notice a pattern where the more south and east you go the less Czech loving they got, but the north and north west remained very favourable towards the Czechs.
    7
  38. I like to view US as a post colonial renounce. Similar to many demographic changes throughout the colonial and precolonial eras. Eg. Frank's invading the area of France and mixing up. Or Latins (Portuguese and Spanish) colonising and intermixing in doubt America.
    7
  39. ​ @ep5019 Libia is also over 90% uninhabitable .....
    7
  40. Your comment seems to grossly misunderstand what a traditional United ethnicity means in Europe. As stated. A kid with parent that is Polish and German is mixed. A kid that is Mixed (like the above) and is married into another one that is seen as German is seen as German with Mixed heritage. A kid that is German of mixed heritage and married a German (even of mixed heritage) is German. Hence why Ethnicity is not purely genetics, it's very much an Ethno-Cultural concept. Secondly, an ethnic group can change within itself. Eg how Latins changed to Romans. That's through a natural Ethno-Cultural development. So you cannot state that they are mix of Romans, Saxons, Bavarians and so on... When the German ethnicity is based as an evolved concept from the ones that were listed.
    7
  41. ​​ @johnwotek3816 As much as I hate to admit it they are right. Human rights are rights that humans give to one another on the basis of belief and agreement that they are. The reality of Rights is that a true right is only as much as you are capable of doing yourself as an individual, where no one else guarantees you anything. Eg. If you are in a jungle, shouting that you have the right to clean water won't help you. A Tyger won't stop itself from eating you because you have the right to life... Human rights is a power structure which exists purely because other humans believe it does. But the fact is that even then they are not obliged to confirm to them - less so if they are certain that those they provide them to would not provide them to them or others. (Which is often the case with a lot of Muslim countries). The concept of Human rights essentially evolved from the late Christian churches, both protestants and Catholics. Eg. A basic form was the right to liturgy in native language and not Old Church Slavonic or Latin. This developed into the rights of ethnic groups to their own languages and even to the idea of sovereign individual nations, and to minorities using their minority languages. It is a social construct. A fairly good one. No one is stupid enough to dispute that certain common "laws" even between enemies are good for both. But are man made non the less. Just look at Fantasy writing of GRRM for example - guest rights are a man made rights but most comply with it because they believe them to be right and. Good for both sides. Those who do not are disposed by all sides equally.
    7
  42. What I noticed the most is that as someone who grew up in truly traditional Slavic family (that being within the Rod- clan, not just man and woman... That's not Slavic tradition). I grew up with my grandparents in one house, whilst seeing and visiting my other grandparents every week atkeast once. I have also frequently met siblings of my grandparents several times a months... And even am familiar with my grandmother's aunt. I have always been friendly with elderly and they were good with me. But when I moved to the UK, people do not have that experience. A lot of them do not even know their grandparents... Let alone siblings of their grandparents or their aunts... The animosity towards elderly and generally looking down on them is something I cannot unnotice. But at the same time I do see many elderly here just straight shit on the young too. It's weird but it's also what I see in Slovakia... Usually with those whom were from small families.
    7
  43. You have an obvious fallacy in your statement. "Wouldn't all the rich countries have higher fertility?" Well no. Housing is more expensive. Housing in poor countries isn't and is generally larger even if worse quality. If you want to own a house in the UK you need to have some 11/13 times the average yearly salary. This has literally been covered in this video and previous ones on this channel.
    7
  44. ​ @purpledurple621  like I said... That's the very Anglo-sphere point of views which in fact does not reflect the majority of the word. Once again you mixed what ethnic and race is. You made ethnics a race issue which it isn't. Ethnicity is not a race, norna sub race, it a mix of cultural, linguistic and sup-racial. Which is also why emigration form closely allied and akin places works more and also has a lot more assimilation which results into the people becoming nominally ethic and their descendants becoming part of the Ethnicity over all. You point something that was racial and centered around places which actually had slavery and influx of people of colour. Not the case in Easter Europe which still is mono ethnic with Nation States dividing these ethnicities on agreed terms, and these Nations sovereignties respected by one another due to common cultural and historic struggles. Somehow you managed to suggest that 95-85% mono ethnic groups should become a mixed race group within 50 years because that is the trend of America, which begin an influx of foreign immigrant both from Europe and Africa, as well as parts of Asia... And then developed into a Federalised Nation where over time these groups mix. Completely different contexts. And the effects which you described would be pretty much forced ethnic cleansing if forced onto any foreign nation.
    6
  45. Just like Glorifying UK. Yeah it's richer over all... But even for the poor Slovakia it has higher ratio of people of any kind facing poverty... Meanwhile some of the places are barely any better than the commie buildings (often the commie blocks are fine in EU because they were renovated, painted and so on). But UK... Row multiconnected houses, small rooms and tiny garden.. if not a gravel or concrete plot instead of a garden... If a garden at all. And then.. the cities are still far less green over all. (Ps I live in UK)
    6
  46. I dare you to do a video covering Czechia and Slovakia, their differences and similarities.
    6
  47. This is akin to Germanization and Magyarusarion policies pre WW1
    6
  48. For you lot... I know I am a Slav from a west Slavic country as my name suggests.... What I mean Lt it that people from similar cultures are more willing to assimilate,or certainly their children would be near fully assimilated to Poland. Which is different with fortger removed foreign cultures
    6
  49. The only time we don't hate on Hungary
    6
  50. Irrelevant
    6