Comments by "Django" (@django3422) on "BBC News" channel.

  1.  @is17a985  So nowhere, then. Thanks for playing.
    4
  2. Easy to say when you've got more than you need. Somewhat hypocritical when your country's wealth has been amassed by exploiting the homes of these people you're denigrating.
    4
  3.  @Dimii_1  You just described a pretty spot-on profile for textbook misogyny with daddy issues, what's confusing you?
    4
  4.  @tastypymp1287  You just said "you think laws prevent misdemeanours". A misdemeanour is a minor wrongdoing, is that what you think mass shootings are?
    4
  5. ​ @andrzejzie7046  I'd love to see how you gathered that data.
    4
  6. ​ @jd0604  He absolutely did.
    4
  7.  @sebastianguerre6868  There's a difference between relying on and literally requiring.
    4
  8. ​ @mclovin2123 You might wanna read up a bit on the guy...
    4
  9.  @VRTrucker  What do you think that story proves? YOU made a choice to turn other people's essential needs into a source of profit. You call yourself an accidental landlord which is a lie, as you earlier made clear that you "decided to rent it". And now you're complaining about increased costs when few are feeling that more keenly than renters who, unlike you, have NO fallback. Oh, and "overregulation", which speaks volumes about the attitude landlord's hold their tenants in. No, I have zero sympathy for your greed. Plus the idea you were renting a 3 bedroom house out for £500pcm, which makes me inclined to call your entire story a lie but whatever...
    4
  10. What are you on about?
    4
  11. I think many of us are capable of disliking him for both.
    4
  12.  @Younes07770  Many of us prefer animals to people. Thanks for demonstrating why.
    4
  13. ​ @AuralioCabal-nl8gi The irony of you telling anyone they need an education...
    3
  14. You Musk fanboys are just weird.
    3
  15.  @mrbubbles6468  I never said they gave no answer. I said they can't defend or explain their views. Try to respond to what I said, not to what you were thinking.
    3
  16.  @dresden5060  We say that in the UK? Where? I've never heard it said. Not sure what she's ever given to us, either. They're good at taking, those Windsors. Very bad at the whole giving back thing.
    3
  17. ​ @sherry0079  What do you think he's in trouble for? Because it's certainly not speaking the truth.
    3
  18. And Churchill would know all about morals...
    3
  19.  @KyleTheDalek  Not too bright, huh?
    3
  20.  @KyleTheDalek  Practicing your routine in front of your mirror?
    3
  21. ​ @marcK599 They don't, actually.
    3
  22.  @hafs174r  Think about others than just yourself.
    3
  23. ​ @tastypymp1287 You use a lot of words to say nothing.
    3
  24.  @tastypymp1287  Definitely nothing to do with your empty attempts at point scoring.
    3
  25.  @tastypymp1287  Because you're so impartial. Anything to avoid explaining yourself, eh?
    3
  26.  @tastypymp1287  Irony.
    3
  27.  @tastypymp1287  Or could it be that the other guy you were arguing with agrees with me? Nah, that'd make sense. And why should you break the habit of a lifetime?
    3
  28. ​@dondoodatIt's all about quantity with this guy.
    3
  29. Source; "Putin said trust me, bro".
    3
  30. It varies from species to species, but living trees are more fire resistant than you might think. Doesn't mean the fire doesn't ruin them, just leaves more behind than just embers.
    3
  31. ​ OliTwisoak It says a lot about the kind of PoS you are that you see the consequences of military bombardment and conclude "they're just playing the victim card". Pain and discomfort can't find you soon enough.
    3
  32.  @johnabbottphotography  They're not making the comparison. You're trying to lead them to the comparison by ducking his question with your own.
    3
  33. Sounds like you don't know much about the man. You should check out Robert Evans' reporting on him.
    3
  34. In some cases, the cowards are in front of TV cameras, while hiding behind a persona. The likes of Tucker Carlson come to mind.
    3
  35.  @southwestndn8401  You could check, instead of just guessing. And, ironically, a lot of civilian deaths in that part of the world are the result of US drone strikes...
    3
  36. ​ @jakemorj5498  Evidence of this?
    3
  37.  @claudiolanza5226  That's not democratic. That's mob rule and quite authoritarian.
    3
  38. Ain't that a funny coincidence. Invent your own god, who then says you're a special, chosen people. Handy. Also total nonsense but hey...
    3
  39. Nah, you're all kinds of wrong.
    3
  40. No, it's not. It's how we're using what we've got. Funnily enough, rich buggers filling massive swimming pools and setting up elaborate fountains on their driveways to impress other cretins are having a much bigger impact than most of us are.
    3
  41. ​ @CarlStJohn-x9w That's fine, we've got more than enough heterosexual people keeping the numbers up. Does it help you to think of gay people as a built-in population management?
    3
  42. ​ @PartTimeJedi  What's that then, the whole "there's no such thing as assault weapons" argument? So, a technicality? You're effectively arguing the semantics, not the logic or reason. See yourself out instead.
    3
  43.  @akashx  Uh-huh, sure.
    3
  44. Can you?
    3
  45.  @buddymacbuddington  You oughta re-read my comment first. Putin needs supplies from Iran and China, just as Ukraine needs supplies from Europe and the US. But if these "allies" have publicly abstained, that sends Putin the message that they cannot publicly help him.
    3
  46. ​ @Dimii_1 Erm... yeah. How is this not obvious to you?
    3
  47. That's your opinion and totally missing the point.
    3
  48. @MattCoates-Whay  Covering over swastika graffiti is fascism now? That's a mad take.
    3
  49.  @ayoolukoga9829  Yes, because we're talking about consenting adults. It's your sick mind bringing kids into this.
    3
  50. ​ @sunnydays8270 That's a modern motto, only established in 1956.
    3