Comments by "Django" (@django3422) on "BBC News" channel.

  1.  @justknows8164  So humans have never invented anything new, ever?
    1
  2.  @justknows8164  I'd hope so as you didn't explain anything there.
    1
  3. And he didn't do any of it because he held firmly rooted ideologies. He did it for influence. So that he'd be popular with the president, regardless of who it was or what they believed. He did it out of ego, refusing to let peace talks go ahead if it meant someone other than him getting the credit. The man believed in nothing but furthering himself.
    1
  4.  @QwadLuzr  How are you defining "climate alarmist"?
    1
  5.  @QwadLuzr  John Kerry isn't a climate scientist. Can you name any climate scientists with beachfront mansions?
    1
  6. ​ @zaiyas1408  Odd logic on your part. Why don't you care about the rights of gay Ugandans?
    1
  7.  @stubstoo6331  We're wrong about what we call 'em? Don't think so, chap. That's our business. And don't try turning this into some kind of historical genital measuring contest. Americans lose every time. Result of having such a short and colourful history.
    1
  8.  @Leo-gt1bx  What are you on about?
    1
  9. I've got gay family members. You think they should be killed because of something about them that has no effect on you?
    1
  10. You're not a windsurfer, you're just a liar.
    1
  11. ​ @tastypymp1287 Prove it.
    1
  12.  @tastypymp1287  You're claiming its false, so prove that it's false.
    1
  13.  @tastypymp1287  Because you couldn't, I get it.
    1
  14.  @tastypymp1287  Describes everything you're doing, I agree. C'mon man, get off the back foot.
    1
  15. ​ @smungek This is childishly stupid and incorrect.
    1
  16. What facts did they twist here?
    1
  17. That's why the rest of the world has the same amount of armed criminals running around causing shootings, right? It couldn't be that you're grossly wrong...
    1
  18. How would they track them though? As I understand it, the sub was relying on contact with the surface for positioning.
    1
  19.  @oscarwindham6016  I don't know enough to properly comment, my only concern then would be that you might just be playing chase.
    1
  20.  @oscarwindham6016  What I mean is... if they're taken by a current, isn't it likely that by the time a position is established they've already been carried elsewhere?
    1
  21. ​ @Wongseifu548 Why are all your responses just mad flailing?
    1
  22. ​ @JamesSmith-qs4hx  You do realise that a homogenous society would produce people with weaker immune systems over time, right?
    1
  23. That's an easily debunked lie. Spain have in fact strengthened their laws against bestiality. But right-wing politicians who want to destabilise and undermine the Spanish government are spreading the lie that they've legalised it. I wonder what else right-wing figures have lied to you about...
    1
  24. Depends what happened. If the sub imploded... no.
    1
  25. ​ @glenntoplis8872 Such as?
    1
  26. ... how?
    1
  27.  @a.i_test  With no onboard GPS?
    1
  28.  @a.i_test  Can you confirm they didn't? If we're gonna second-guess every single thing we know about the sub, then you might as well say that they activated their time machine and rode into the sunset on scuba-dinosaurs. Because you can't confirm they didn't have that. The important question to ask, when fitting yourself for a tin-foil hat, is why they would bother.
    1
  29.  @DK-pw5bt  The conflation between gay people and paedophiles is a lazy ploy by fascists to manipulate gullible, ignorant folk like you.
    1
  30. What are you on about?
    1
  31.  @marcK599  When there's plenty documented cases of heterosexual men who were found to be paedophiles, I think it's safe to say we're gonna ignore you for being an idiot.
    1
  32. I'd imagine the gay Ugandans affected by this law care.
    1
  33. I think you're confusing bombs with planes.
    1
  34.  @davidrobertsemail  Give some examples of how they've been wrong. The claim and the scientist who made it. Let's get to the bottom of this.
    1
  35.  @davidrobertsemail  Who is "they"? Names and specific claims.
    1
  36.  @davidrobertsemail  What a surprise, you can't. Because you don't know. You're just regurgitating some grifter's spiel and they weren't specific because they're talking nonsense. So you play silly games like this instead.
    1
  37. Physical media has a larger carbon footprint.
    1
  38. You're proudly sleepwalking through life, huh?
    1
  39. Happer isn't a climate scientist and takes money from fossil fuel interests to push the denial narrative. Lindzen has also taken a lot of money from the fossil fuel industry; Cato Institute, Heartland Institute, Peabody Coal. He also doesn't believe that smoking is a primary cause of lung cancer. That's how seriously he should be taken...
    1
  40. What is this agenda you keep speaking of? Explain it.
    1
  41.  @coolgranddad5430  Why can't you answer?
    1
  42. Using religious arguments to condemn gay people is common sense? Since when?
    1
  43. How is the BBC far-left when it's senior personnel were put in place by our right-wing Tory government?
    1
  44. Can you rearrange those words to make a sentence?
    1
  45. You wanna learn a bit of that history before presuming that everyone in the UK feels any kind of bond to the Windsors...
    1
  46. I'm afraid he's beyond the reach of any earthly authority now...
    1
  47. What happened to respecting gay people's human rights.
    1
  48.  @markmorrid8144  I'm not bothered if you care or not. My concern is making sure there's push-back to your lies.
    1
  49. Chapter One; Concerning Hobbits...
    1
  50. Russian propaganda. You left out the bit where 2014 was a citizen's revolt after Russia tried rigging Ukrainian elections.
    1