General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Chef Chaudard
Anders Puck Nielsen
comments
Comments by "Chef Chaudard" (@chefchaudard3580) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
We are now on year 3 of the 3 days operation. Everything goes as planned.😂
2
 @algor8541 do you realize that destabilizing African countries to put friendly dictatorships in place is against these countries sovereignty? That’s what Russia did.
2
 @algor8541 no, i call that countries where some military generals took over a the power by force. Is it a normal way to seize power where you live? Do you call that a »democratic country »? And France pays for what it is buying. Doing business is not a bad thing.
2
 @evgeniya7853 maybe, and? What is your point? That we should not react when they bully others?
2
 @algor8541 French forces were never in Nigeria. Military junta ask French government to leave Niger, Burkina Faso and Mali. So we did, unlike the Russians in Ukraine. And, no, prices for French companies are the same than for other countries, this is normal trade.
2
 @algor8541 we did not invade Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso. We were there because they called us. We leave these countries when their government asked us. we did not invade Ukraine. This is just whataboutism.
2
No.
2
Bot…
2
Putin? Sure!
2
Unlikely. During WWI France mobilized 8 millions people and lost 1,400,000 for a comparable population. Ukraine is far, far from these numbers.
2
Arm these conscripts with what? Sticks and stones? And if they could use their aviation, they would. But they can't, for various reasons.
2
Putin himself disagree with you : he was upset, promised to « free » that part of Russia. And he did nothing of the sort so far.
2
05:38 i would split phase 1 in 2 parts: Phase 1 ends when it becomes clear that the 3 days offensive cannot be achieved because of ukrainian opposition. In Phase 2, the russians tend to push forward without reconfiguring their military arrangement, despite losses and the fact they are stuck in many places, in hope that ukrainian opposition will collapse.
2
 @ignacemorel641 he worked for nato, whose potential adversary was (still is) Russia. He may have some knowledge about Hamas or Israeli strategies and tactics, but it is probably not his strong suit.
2
Year 3 of the 3 days operation. Everything goes as planned…😂
2
Hey, we are talking of Russia, here. Maybe the seventh army in the world, an economy the size of Spain! Not some superpower the world must listen to! USSR died decades ago!
2
Watch Anders' video about the subject, and come back.
2
« Perfect solution fallacy » It is not because something is not perfect it is useless. These warrants are an hindrance for Putin. It shows he is not above the laws, it restricts the number of countries he can visit, and put Russia in a bad light.
2
 @sergeipetrov_rzn « frivolous « … tell that to the victims.
2
F-16s…😊
2
Because he knows what he is talking about, unlike you.
2
 @markopodganjek845 I doubt that. China is helping Russia, because it pisses off the US. But they can’t do do that openly. And if Russian economy collapses, they will never pour the billions required to sustain it. Because this money will be used to sustain the way of life of people in St Petersburg or Moscow, not the war. What will most likely happen is that Russia will go deeper in a war economy, with fixed salaries, fixed prices to stop inflation… and nothing to buy in the shops and no investments in the non military sectors. All money going to the war effort.
1
« Breakthroughs » of 1 or 2km 😂😂 « flea bites on the bear » that forced Russia to a war economy, after the loss of tens of thousand armored véhicules, hundreds of thousand dead and injured… Yeah… no!
1
 @RandallBurt-u1w it is a war of attrition. Ukraine has more ressources, thanks to the allies, and manpower, as they don’t have to care about other borders or their industry, unlike the Russians. Morale of the troops is good enough that they hold their position and even counterattacked. And that for two years and a half. USA was defeated in Vietnam and Afghanistan, despite being a nuclear power. France leaved Mali when this country asked for it. These are facts. Selling an alternate reality is what Russian trolls are paid for.
1
 @jful he’s a troll. He spams the same sh*t under every video where Russia is mentioned . I bet you’ll have no answer.
1
This clown in the comments shows he is stupid!
1
 @toto-yf8tc ok, we’ll see for the 6 months. Future will tell. For the rest, I stand by what I said. You’re not a very good troll.
1
 @olafsigursons according to Wikipedia, russia has 35 Mi-26. One heli can carry only half the load of a standard lorry. And probably only a part of them are available (maybe 10, 15) I don't think it will be a game changer. But it shows, as you said, that they have not enough troups in the region.
1
That’s not what he said. Watch the video before commenting.
1
NATO is stronger than ever… thanks Putin!
1
Nuclear threat is a bluff.
1
 @praveendreamer well… the « bluff » has far, far more tanks, aircraft’s, soldiers, warships than Russia. It is also much more wealthy. So I would not call the big guy a « bluff » when I am half his size and weight.
1
Do you believe Ukrainian propaganda?
1
Are not the Russians supposed to be the invaders, not the opposite? Kyiv in three days?
1
Russia winning the war? They have already lost. No credibility on the international scene, it’s professional army gone, most of its tanks and IFVs destroyed, NATO close to its borders, the economy in shambles,…
1
 @tomk3732 you are not pro Russian? You? lol!😂
1
This kind of warfare, apart from the nuclear bombs, has proven to be inefficient.
1
 @andrewallen9993 what are you talking about? Bombing a factory a power plant is not the same as targeting civilians, to break their will to fight, in accordance with Giulio Douhet theory. Which eventually never worked.
1
 @RandallBurt-u1w why do you answer me? You know the guy I was answering to? He is a grown up and can reply himself, without your help.
1
500 miles? That’s called a missile, not a bomb. No bomb has such a range.
1
 @enriquelaroche5370 an AASM has a range of about 70km. Compare that to 800km (500miles) Pretending that a glide bomb has such a range is just…well…
1
 @enriquelaroche5370 ten times…. Ten times the range of a standard glide bomb… sure, bro… It is not a « range extender », it is an actual missile propulsion system.
1
Being neutral when it has been proven your adversary does not care about your neutrality is suicidal.
1
Do you remember the Vietnam war? At some stage, the north Vietnamese army did not have the means to take the south. The US were much, much stronger. And who won in the end?
1
 @Markusctfldl it may be « wishful thinking », but the fact is that the war is raging for almost 3 years, that the invader is now invaded. And, even if Ukraine cannot recapture Donbas, they will not be a satellite state of the Russian empire. And this is quite an achievement. Compared to Vietnam, the USA were not economically or militarily broke. There were stronger than ever. On the contrary, Russian economy is struggling, drawing on its « health fund » to finance its war and spending all its money to buy military gear that will be destroyed in Ukraine. The old Soviet stock is almost empty, and the professional army was replaced by hastily trained volunteers.
1
 @Markusctfldl Ukraine does not want to take parts of russia, while Russia wants parts of Ukraine, if not the whole country. so, comparing the two is moot
1
And, what difference does it make on the strategic level? Did Russia take Kyiv? Threaten Kherson and Odessa? Ukrainian supply routes from Poland?
1
 @Princip666 Watch the video. It answers your question.
1
 @Princip666 it’s worthless because the arrows are too big? Seriously? May I suggest you watch it again?
1
Stop lying.
1
Previous
2
Next
...
All