Comments by "Chef Chaudard" (@chefchaudard3580) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. Medvedev repeats that. And just because Putin does not say something are we entitled to doubt it? He is not trustworthy, anyway.
    1
  2.  @tjtube65 it’s a bot you are talking to!
    1
  3. Tea leaves? Cristal ball? Chicken entrails? 😂
    1
  4.  @evgeniya7853  thé OP is your friend? He cannot defend himself and need a lapdog to bark for him?
    1
  5. I think that the type of warfare has changed. Rasputitza is still a hindrance, but the fight is more about small quantities of soldiers attacking entrenched soldiers, covered by an anti aircraft bubble and supported by artillery. Not large forces of tanks and IFVs charges or cavalry runs. Moving supplies around is not so critical.
    1
  6. What about watching the video before commenting ? You should try!
    1
  7. It is also why Al Assad fall is a blow to Russia. They don’t really need Syria economically or militarily. What they needed was the symbol : a puppet state far away to show the world they are still a powerful country. Putin invaded Ukraine because he wanted to stop the crumbling of the Russian empire. Events in Georgia, Moldova, Belarus, the war between Azerbaïdjan and Armenia he could not prevent were evidence he could not control this empire. Ukraine independence was the nail in the coffin. Putin so resorted to the only way he knows to settle things : violence. Coercing Ukraine into submission would demonstrate the might of Russia to the world, more than any hypersonic wunderwaffe or Lavrov visit to some junta leaders in Africa. And show puppet countries what was awaiting them if they tried to rebel.
    1
  8. That it is BS. Anybody can type GPS coordinates in a computer.
    1
  9.  @peturadunga  i suppose that the supply of the missiles included training and tools… so what?
    1
  10.  @peturadunga  using a missile is not rocket science… well, it is 😁 but there is nothing that can’t be learned by clever people in a few months. All they have to know is how to prepare the missile, check it, set the coordinates of the target and voila. The missile relies on its inertial system and GPS reception to hit the correct location. There is a video here on YouTube of some blokes learning how to do that, and they are not high end engineers.
    1
  11.  @peturadunga  i worked in there, yes. Not ATACMS but similar domain… but maybe you’ll have an answer from APN?
    1
  12.  @peturadunga  western countries giving information to Ukraine is no secret, nor new. France declared they give free access to French satellites to Ukraine several years ago. NATO also declared they were helping Ukraine with information a few months after Russian invasion. Despite that, Russia never declared war to these countries at the time, judging that it was not important enough for that. So, what is your point?
    1
  13.  @peturadunga  i have answered your question. Twice : there is no need of a more direct involvement of western personnel. As far as we know, there is nothing new for months and no reason to think it is different now. There are probably some « advisers », but not more than one or two years ago. I would say that there are probably less now, as the Ukrainians have learned how to use and maintain most of the weapon systems they have been supplied with.
    1
  14. I checked and… no! It has not.
    1
  15. Russian economy is a war economy: they spend fortunes to sustain the war. And they will run out of Soviet equipment to reactivate, sooner or later.
    1
  16.  @dingbobgasama8224 there are no « open doors » in a war, as long as there are troops to hold their positions. Fortifications can be built in a matter of days. In the Somme region, the terrain is flat, and despite that, the Germans hold their positions in 1916.
    1
  17.  @dingbobgasama8224  until Pokrovsk is taken (if it is even taken), the Ukrainians have plenty of time to fortify their rear. It is not the Kursk front, where the Russians did not expect an attack. It is a location that is disputed for years, where the Russians push for months. In short, achieving surprise gives a big advantage. There will be no surprise on the Pokrovsk front.
    1
  18. Sûre… source « trust me bro! »😂
    1
  19.  @XL0G yes… and?
    1
  20.  @XL0G  why don’t you answer my question ? Too much for you? You know how to call people names, but fail at giving any argument?
    1
  21.  @XL0G  ‘yes’ means you are right. Anders says in the video that The offensive has not yet reached culmination and it is about 2 months since it started. ‘And?’ Is to ask you what conclusion you draw from these facts, that all viewers are aware of . If any.
    1
  22.  @XL0G  let say, for the sake of the argument ‘yes…and?’
    1
  23.  @XL0G  why are you repeating what’s in the video? I’ve watched it… So, your point was to say that the Ukrainian offensive is still stuck at the moment, despite great efforts and losses. OK. Thanks Captain Obvious! Which does not say anything about where and why A P Nielsen is wrong. You just assert it. I’ll answer like I did to the other troll : « quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur ».
    1
  24. Probably some cover to a reconnaissance mission.
    1
  25. Why winter? You still believe in Santa Claus?
    1
  26.  @Princip666  do you mean you need a source for things that are common knowledge? Did you live under a rock? You happen to know that Russia is currently invading Ukraine? That they launched several offensive, some still ongoing? That these had very limited success? Come on!
    1
  27. OK vatnik…
    1
  28. Says who?
    1
  29. And you believe Ukrainian propaganda?
    1
  30.  @petronixoonable  Russian propaganda assure they can defend their oil facilities! All the hundreds of drones were shot down and only minor damages were caused, due to debris!😁 So it is not a good example. Ukraine is asking for more weapons and ammunitions. Better show why.
    1
  31.  @petronixoonable  yeah, you start to understand. Not all the information coming from both sides can be taken as face value. It must be analyzed. asserting things like if it was some undeniable truth, because it fits your preconceived ideas, like you do, is stupid. The fact is that the Ukrainians can be short of men and ammunitions on the Pokrovsk front… or they want the Russians to believe it. We don’t know. Some experts, for example, have said that there are some Ukrainians elite brigades that are not on the Prokrovsk or Kursk fronts. We don’t know where there are. Could the Ukrainians have some hidden reserves?
    1
  32.  @rphb5870  « sabotage » is from Russian point of view. Ukrainians beg to differ 😁
    1
  33. 😂😂🤡
    1
  34. The losses in the Kursk region cannot be compared to the losses in the Pokrovsk region. It was achieved in a few days, against an enemy that was both surprised and inferior.
    1
  35.  @funyt7364  number of days, I said it. There is so much you can loose per day.
    1
  36. The fact is that the war is raging for almost 3 years… boring?
    1
  37.  @Jinke888  the war has no value?
    1
  38. No.
    1
  39. Win what? Did you watch the video? It is unlikely Russia will ever reach its goals.
    1
  40.  @algor8541  no, it is not an assumption. What Russia did to France in Africa demonstrates that this country is toxic. The « hybrid war » it leads in Europe demonstrates that. The attack of a free and indépendant country, despite the numerous treaties Russia signed demonstrates that. We have plenty of good reasons to think that Russia is a threat.
    1
  41.  @evgeniya7853  no argument? You are down to ad personam and insults? OK, troll…🤡
    1
  42.  @algor8541  Niger is totally free to switch to another customer. They are actually doing that the moment. France never threatened to invade the country for that. So, I don’t know where your « neocolonial » situation is…
    1
  43. Russia already lost.
    1
  44. Yeah.. and you talk to US pilots training the Ukrainians daily… Sure, bro…
    1
  45.  @nikolajk5330  « gen5 systems »… which system are you talking of? The invisible Su 57?😁 And F-16 is considered as 4gen. So, it will do.
    1
  46.  @nikolajk5330  i don’t think the F-16 will be a game changer. No more than Anders. Tanks and IFVs were a game changer : the Russians were stopped, retreated and are now stalling. « Massive attacks » by Russia are not so massive : they are unable to achieve any strategic goal, apparently. A runway is a runway. There are no special runways for F-16. And there are plenty of them in Ukraine, leftover of the USSR. Even a highway can do : the Swiss demonstrated recently that F-18 can use them. Can you ever have a valid point, or just garbage?
    1
  47. Kursk is not in Russia anymore? The Ukrainian are « retreating » in Russia proper?
    1
  48. « Us »? You are already at war, vatnik!
    1
  49. They are not winning.
    1
  50. Only one country had nuclear weapons, at the time… Times change, you know? Basing your understanding of today on 1945 geopolitics will lead you to bad conclusions.
    1