Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Mark Felton Productions" channel.

  1. The inescapable reality is that those "SPGs" will be called to perform the duties of tanks when needed. We still see the footage of Russian tanks being used in assaults, and both the Kharkiv and Kherson offensives required the use of tanks as tanks by Ukrainian forces. They're being used as SPGs because the conditions for concentrating force an breaching frontlines simply aren't there yet.
    12
  2.  @jamesdulak3108  In this case the technology would be for the good of mankind. Reagan shared GPS with the world even though it was military technology, after an airliner invaded Soviet airspace by mistake.
    9
  3. The Phantom still scored the vast majority of kills by missile, with the addition of the gun not making much of a difference. Even the F-8, "the last gunfighter", claimed more kills by Sidewinder than by gun.
    9
  4. ​ @reeyees50  Not really. Russia is going back to 1960s tech and the US is sending 80s and Desert Storm era stuff. If anything, we're watching bizarro world Cold War Gone Hot.
    6
  5.  @Mortablunt  The Sherman was well designed, though.
    5
  6.  @cwdrock  Except that's a neat little fairy tale to make History Channel documentaries more interesting. USN Phantoms wrecked MiGs without cannons and never added them. The USAF scored about a hundred missile kills with the Phantom and only around a dozen kills with guns on pod-equipped/E variant Phantoms.
    3
  7. They most likely do not have "thousands" of T-55s in a usable condition. The thousands of T-72 turned out to not really be there so they needed the thousands of T-62s, of which they're planning to refurbish... Around eight hundred. Hulls sitting on the rain and snow for decades really aren't up to snuff.
    3
  8.  @sugarnads  "its basically inarguable it was influenced by the stg42/43/44, detachable magazine fed, intermediate cartridge, etcetcetc." - Considering how the drive to have an assault rifle project had heavy influence from the Soviet experience in using submachine guns in urban combat, it would be a given that the weapon would have a detachable magazine. That's essentially undeniable, the StG wasn't the first weapon issued in the battlefield to have detachable magazines. Also, the Soviets designed the 7.62x39mm M43 cartridge before they even had a weapon to fire it. So while the cartridge was definitely influenced by 7.92 Kurz, you can't say the AK derived it from the StG. The rifle was designed around the caliber rather than being designed to mimic the StG.
    3
  9. This is not true. By 1972 the introduction of Teaball allowed the USAF to outscore the Navy with a whopping 15 to 1 kill ratio until operations ended in 1973. Not only did they have better training and improved cockpit "switchology", they were at this point fixing the major issue which was terrible ground radar coverage.
    2
  10. And the Bradleys actually took out main battle tanks in Desert Storm in head to head combat before Abrams could arrive to help.
    2
  11. Several issues here. First of all, cancelling the attack plays into the insurgency. They're going to be back. You're spending millions of dollars for every week you stay in country, be in hazard pay, keeping air conditioning units working, security contractors, etc. Fleeing when facing insurmountable odds and waiting for the next opportunity to attack. They can just go home and wait two weeks while the US economy is slowly bled by the costs of occupation. I'd rather drop a precision guided bomb from tens of thousand feet in the air, unseen and unheard and get them all at once while they're clustered before they scatter. Second, it's not hard to believe considering that not only the aircraft was supposed to be originally retired in 1993, it already required Boeing to receive a billion dollar contract... twice... to rebuild the aging wings, the company that made it went out of business in 2003, and it's been mostly replaced by F-16s, Strike Eagles and F/A-18s.
    2
  12. A British nuclear physicist was killed in WWI. Imagine if we had nuclear power before WW2. So much suffering would have been averted.
    2
  13.  @jcrass2361  "REEE freedom bad anyone who wants free markets is a Nazi"
    2
  14. And then the official channels confirmed it wasn't true.
    2
  15.  @lenney872  Some of the "armbands" were ties used to restrain people. Photos from up close show bodies with hands tied behind their backs.
    2
  16. That project fell through, only a few aircraft were acquired. The stated purpose is training other nations but it's obviously for SOCOM, which was covered by the Bronco against ISIS. The Bronco's return was short lived due to maintenance costs. The Army has washed their hands out of the A-10 issue and their official position is that they only need ordnance on target and don't care what delivered it.
    2
  17.  @dandare2586  No, congress will not authorize the USAF to retire it. It just doesn't get that much action anymore because they send the F-16 or Strike Eagles instead. So the USAF is stuck keeping an aircraft in inventory that they barely use.
    2
  18. It would be drone grenade bait.
    2
  19.  @navyreviewer  It's important to also consider two issues - the Navy had the better Sidewinders as they correctly predicted before the war that the 9B wouldn't cut it and started developing an upgrade before Vietnam, and the USAF had better luck with the Sparrows because as the Ault report confirmed the Navy Sparrows were subjected to the harsher conditions of carrier service but with looser maintenance scheduling than USAF Sparrows.
    1
  20. If I defend my house with a musket, the internet will hail me as a hero. If I try to rob a bank with a musket, the internet will laugh at the CCTV footage of me getting taken out by the police.
    1
  21.  @tebbs94  General "I'll call China first" Milley?
    1
  22. I'm sure there's pictures of those 14 aircraft. Because I only saw a struck Russian Mi-8.
    1
  23.  @quisqueyanguy120  Once a missile is off the rail, it doesn't care which generation of fighter shot it. Especially when it's 4.5 gen vs 4th gen.
    1
  24.  @asherwiggin6456  First shot is based on first look. The Ukrainian tactic (which Russians quickly adapted to) was to bait a Russian fighter into shooting and try to escape, knowing the Russian would easily chase him down and kill him. However, as the Russian pilot gabe chase, there would be a Ukrainian wingman flying low that would spring up from below and shoot at the Russian. A trap. Elephant in a hallway. The vast majority of pilots show down in air combat did not know they were targeted until it was too late. This is the prime example. Doesn't matter the Ukranian fighters are less modern, doesn't matter their missiles don't have "first shoot" capability". First shoot is based on the wingman seeing the chase aircraft while the chasing aircraft is focused on shooting down the bait aircraft. In Vietnam the NV pilots countered then Phantom by waiting for them to be escorting bombers at slow speed, fly around them and strike from behind at high speed. Doesn't matter the Phantom was superior, they got trapped. Then Phantom pilots responded by flying in bomber formation. When NV pilots expected to target Phantoms escorting bombers, turned out it was a full flight if Phantoms looking for a fight. That's another trap.
    1
  25. They don't have T-64s. The T-64s were built in Ukraine, and deemed too expensive to build an entire army with them. So the T-72s was developed as a cost-cutting alternative. Russia has the means to produce and refurbish the T-72, while the T-64 facilities are stuck in Ukraine so they lost access to those after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The T-62s? Those have been used as main battle tanks. There's video evidence of their use and destruction.
    1
  26. There was no overthrow. Yanukovych passed laws against free speech and limiting the right to protest, then had hired thugs and police beat down protesters. People rose up in defiance of the new laws, police started shooting steel slugs meant to disable engine blocks into crowds. The Berkut special unit (Russian-trained) was also suspected of using snipers to target both police and protesters to escalate the violence and get Kiev under martial law. After all of this, Yanukovych feared prosecution so he fled to Mother Russia. His own party disavowed him, and the parliament voted to officially remove him from power. He wasn't overthrown. He fled because he was a coward who didn't want to face the charges for the deaths. And fled to the country he was truly loyal to.
    1
  27.  @ronaldcross  The USAF F-35A model costs around 78 million dollars. I don't see how pricetag makes an aircraft less capable, but it's not 400M.
    1
  28.  @hunter35474  "there were probably multiple MiGs that got away" - You can't make that assertion. You have no facts to back it up any more than I could reply by simply saying "probably not" and moving on. The earlier Phantom losses occurred when USAF Phantoms flying in blind with no radar coverage were flying at a slower pace to escort bombers and fell into ambushes where Vietnamese MiGs came around the border and did high speed passes for a hit and run attack. The MiGs got away not because of lack of guns, but because there was no chance for the F-4s to accelerate and catch up to them. Let alone get a gun kill. Not to mention that the gun kill is much more difficult to score, and airplanes carried multiple missiles. Even though failure rates were abysmal, a second missile would do a lot more than maneuvering for a gun kill. Either way, early missile failure rates were not just caused by their unreliability, but also because pilots were firing missiles outside of proper launch parameters and ground crews were mishandling the weapons. After extra training for the pilots and ground crews, the issues were not fully resolved but were greatly minimized. Phantoms flying combat patrols and looking for MiGs instead of escorting other aircraft had a good kill ratio. The gun wasn't that big of a deal. "where a gun would've given an easy kill" - Guns are not easy kills. In fact there were squadron leaders who did not authorize their pilots to fly with gun pods because they knew they did not have enough training to put them to good use. "the fact that the next generation of fighters (The Teen Series)" - Two of them are multirole fighters and thus may have to use the gun for ground strafing. One of the use of gun pods on the F-4 was actually the USMC fitting one under the belly and two under the wings to let loose on the ground. Not for air to air combat. "they DID learn their lesson" - Okay, which lesson was that? You're attributing a mostly false narrative as the reason for a decision to be made when there are more logical reasons behind that decision. While aerial gunnery is an important part of pilot training it's generally assumed that in the real world if you get into a gun fight you and your wingmen already made a series of bad decisions to let the situation get to that point. Especially with high off bore axis missiles being a thing.
    1
  29. That was said about the T-62s too. Then they were used as main battle tanks.
    1
  30. There's more of them than before. Grab the mop, there's more cleaning to do.
    1
  31. That depends entirely on many factors. There's been many production batches of F-16 and different Block upgrades. It depends on flight hours logged per aircraft, a larger airforce may log less hours per aircraft while a small force probably flew their airframes until the wheels fell off. If you have a force with a hundred F-16s, an upgrade may make sense thanks to economies of scale. If you have 30, it may be cheaper to just buy 30 F-35s. Aircraft pricing is very counter-intuitive because people always assume doing X is cheaper than Y but that's not a given.
    1
  32.  @stingingmetal9648  Russia isn't doing the upgrades.
    1
  33. Hoax.
    1
  34. The claim that the Nordstream pipeline attack was carried out by the US comes from a journalist who spent the last three decades lying about the US military, has no sources, made several mistakes and has quoted Scott Ritter (a Russian asset and convicted p*dophile) in interviews.
    1
  35. That was the origin of the OA-X program. Never came to fruition but SOCOM purchased a total of two Super Tucanos and T-6 Texans if I'm not mistaken. They also temporarily brought back the Bronco for a year but maintaining it was too expensive.
    1
  36. First unit in was "safari", a SBU unit. Not Azov.
    1
  37.  @lenney872  Sorry, did you perform DNA tests on those people to figure out they were all "ethnic Russians"? Why would Americans make themselves look bad? There's a few instances of bad people who during a war committed heinous acts. There was a group of US troops who left the base, killed a family and comitted SA on a young girl. Who benefited from that? Nobody. War brings out the worst in people.
    1
  38. One side is clearly better than the other. Would you rather tell a story about a pilot who didn't exist, or be pointing at pixels in a video to claim that corpses are moving and the massacres are fake?
    1
  39.  @timhaley3459  White lies are better than red blood.
    1
  40. The A-10s genesis was the A-X program, which started as a single engine turboprop for counter insurgency and helicopter escort.
    1
  41.  @seandalton1709  No, it wasn't the Hurricane. It was meant to be an A-1 Skyraider replacement, because tank busting was not a priority in Vietnam. So the early sketches for A-X prototypes were single engine, not twin engine.
    1
  42.  @seandalton1709  Because 4 years into the program they decided to look into turbofan engines as the technology developed and the focus wasn't Vietnam anymore.
    1
  43.  @randomlyentertaining8287  Because we typically care about our troops, so we want them to have modern optics and good protection. The same job can be done with older and expendable vehicles, but expendable crews. Tons of flag draped coffins coming home isn't good for morale.
    1
  44.  @ProblemOfficer3000  Imagine Mexico essentially getting a "sorry man, you'll stop existing in three days so we're leaving" so they had to fight off the US with only Cold War era stuff before the actual aid arrived.
    1
  45. That's the "official" name, but planes get nicknames. The Strike Eagle is the "Mudhen", the Fighting Falcon is the "Viper", the Super Hornet is the "Rhino". The A-10 is the Thunderbolt II but its nickname is "Warthog".
    1
  46. But the same thing was said about T-62s. Today, we see them taken out in frontline combat.
    1
  47.  @MFitz12  The evidence says they haven't ran out of rusted hulls in Siberia. The evidence says they are running out of components and refurbishable units.
    1
  48.  @MFitz12  Thousands of hulls beyond saving can't be brought back. Thousands of hulls that had the parts stripped to repair working tanks or sell to foreign export markets can't be brought back. The thousands of hulls don't have thousands of trained crews either.
    1
  49.  @MFitz12  Americans don't treat hulls like Russians do.
    1
  50.  @limedickandrew6016  No need to meet a tank for Ukrainians to blow it into space. 1965 to 1955 is a huge gap. A Bradley would chew through a T-55 because it chewed through T-72s in the 90s. Dude... A T-72 wasn't an even match for Bradleys in Desert Storm. What makes you think the T-55 will fare better? Air power over Ukraine - when Kharkiv happened they stopped responding to calls for help due to the number of airframes lost in 1-2 days. Ukrainians certainly don't leave airpower out of the equation. That's why they bring air defense traps with them. Attack a Russian position to get them to call air support, aircraft come in, defenses were pre-positioned to ambush the Russians. That's how Kharkiv was possible despite the so-called Russian air superiority. Ukraine is on the defense. Russia picked the time and place. They had every advantage and squandered it. That's why we laugh. You try to sucker punch someone, but slip and fall, we laugh.
    1