General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Titanium Rain
Johnny Harris
comments
Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Johnny Harris" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
@Melksh1 "that's exactly what I'm saying" that you people always have a conspiracy theory to criticize whatever we do or don't do?
12
@Melksh1 I love how we're simultaneously accused of caring about muslims selectively and also of not caring.
10
The US didn't invade Ukraine, though.
3
The craft isn't rolling. The pod is. So the mirrors and lenses are rotating to keep the horizon stable. The smudge is an artifact from the lenses which rotates to keep the image stable.
2
Well the crazy doctor wrote the notes as if he were a terrorist to throw off the scent.
2
A corner reflector inside a balloon. The US has used those to trick Cuban radars.
2
Nobody wants to look like a fool so they double down instead of admitting they were bamboozled.
2
No. It's a contrast aid. Edge detection software creates a halo around the object to aid the pilot. You can disable this setting to make it disappear.
2
But the invasion had 8k civilian casualties. Mariupol alone had 22k.
2
@TinCupChalice40 No. These cameras are better than you think. You're just used to 1080p/4k cameras being used to capture people from 6-7 feet away. Now use those cameras at night to see tanks from 20 miles away. You can't. The jet fighters can. They're using state of the art optics. You can't develop better right now.
2
These cameras are made to blow up tanks from 20 miles away, at night. Not to film Hollywood blockbusters.
2
@jorgeillueca5260 You assume they are maneuvering and travelling at speeds not possible. Meanwhile it could be just optical illusion.
2
@paulbellino5330 footage being real just means it wasn't tampered with. Real footage of a balloon is real. Great revelation...
2
People don't know the difference between gunshots and fireworks. Demolition charges would have scattered detcord remains all over New York - none were ever found.
2
@lance5041 If the footage was debunked, we depend on the fallible eyes and memory of the pilots.
2
No, they were looking at the pod. Object was too distant for visual.
1
Did he explain why he was caught twice trying to look for young girls on nthe internet?
1
Scott Ritter was in prison for p3dophilia and WMDs were found. American soldiers suffered neurological damage from nerve gas exposure when they found them. It's unfortunate Scott Ritter wasn't there to take the damage instead of them.
1
There's videos inside of cockpits where the displays were filmed (perhaps accidently) and the image these pods obtain is crisp.
1
There were WMDs in Iraq, though.
1
But you weren't sold a war. Russia invaded. You had no say in the matter. No buy, no sell.
1
What do you question about Ukraine? The denazification? Yeah that was a poor excuse.
1
How? The US didn't invade.
1
Element 115 was theorized about in science magazines before Bob Lazar started talking about it. He simply read scientific articles to sound smart.
1
The invasion killed 8k people. The rest were killed by sectarian violence and "insurgents" (terrorists).
1
@cosmocosmandoo9074 that's still acceleration. Any change to velocity is acceleration.
1
Russia invaded, not the US.
1
The war mongers are in Moscow.
1
Other military forces do not disclose it, while in the US things like FOIA requests can get footage declassified.
1
GoPros do not capture better footage and do not see the thermal spectrum.
1
@lauramurman2642 They have good cameras. Take any camera you want and try to look at tanks from 20 miles away. At night. You're not going to see anything. The jet fighters can.
1
It isn't. The US didn't invade.
1
Or, the contrast tracker algorithm was acting up. Targeting pods are not infallible.
1
The horizon is spinning, camera has internal mirror to "derotate" the spinning. This causes horizon to appear stable, but the smear (like astigmatism) spins. The pilots are not used to these smears.
1
Because the objects are like 10 miles away. Bring the fanciest 4k camera you have, it won't even see the object.
1
Mick West has the entire explanation in his channel.
1
@together4Hiscause If Russia was so afraid of NATO, why didbthe Pskov base have no air defense to handle the Ukrainian drones? Russia has been close to NATO for decades.
1
@JoeRogan-DaveSmith2028 1. There was no coup if the government showed up to the Verkhovna Rada and voted. The legitinaye government was not overthrown, they saw the president went AWOL and voted for snap elections. 2. Irrelevant. Crimea did not declare independence from Ukraine. It was seized by Russian troops and a referendum held at gunpoint. Certainly you saw the 2022 referenda in Ukraine with empty ballots being tallied as "Yes", right?
1
@JoeRogan-DaveSmith2028 Biden doesn't matter. The wheels are in motion. This conflict has been going on before the United States existed. You're a lot less important than you think. The world keeps spinning. Force peace terms? How are you going to force those?
1
Chile released UAP footage from a naval helicopter. It was years ago, and Mick West and his contributors at metabunk solved it.
1
Satellite (and aircraft) spy cameras are works of art. FLIR pods are for warfare.
1
Bob Lazar worked at a print shop.
1
@tplyons5459 Damn everyone seems to have worked with Bob in Los Alamos but nobody is willing to corroborate his stories.
1
That number was never confirmed, it was based on rubbish studies.
1
Mick West proves that nobody is above question. Pilots are not gods.
1
@Shrimpspiration It wasn't about bases, Castro wanted control over nuclear missiles. Even Krushchev saw that Castro could not be trusted with nukes.
1
No, it's a radar reflector inside a balloon.
1
Yes, it is. The image is being stabilized by mirror rotation, which causes the horizon to be stabilized but the "object" (lens smudge) to rotate.
1
No. It's a contrast aid. It's a setting on the pod.
1
Because the aircraft is spinning, and the lenses are spinning inside the pod to stabilize the footage. The smear is created by the lenses, so that object appears to spin. The rest of the image does not.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All