Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Thunderf00t" channel.

  1. ​ @2ndexplosivebullet  170000 gasoline car fires probably includes 80s and 90s cars with worse safety features. Most Teslas are less than a decade old.
    21
  2. ​ @Cloxxki  We need CO2. We don't need more than what we already have.
    18
  3.  @2ndexplosivebullet  How many cars sold in 2009? Did they sell 90% of their cars in 2009? No. So most Teslas on the road are modern 2010-present built. There's millions more ICE cars on the road, so they have more fires.
    17
  4.  @Graknorke  A dam can support several times its mass equivalent in water. So the dam always wins when compared to using blocks.
    15
  5.  @2ndexplosivebullet  All vehicles are combustible. The plastics, fabric, etc. all burn easily when a fire gets going. Gasoline and diesel are very combustible but it's difficult to set a major fire in the tank. "Combustion literally creates explosions to propel vehicles" - which needs a VERY precise air/fuel ratio.
    13
  6.  @xKapnKrunch  Now imagine the first engines if everyone already knew that the fuel would never have enough energy density to be useful. That's the issue. Some things don't work right because they need improvement, but the numbers clearly show it's possible. In this case, the numbers show it's a waste of time. You cannot improve past 100%.
    11
  7.  @craigkingdon4424  really? Giving up one of the cleanest and safest energies is good? Germany is back to digging for coal. Coal kills more people than nuclear, but hey you say it's a good thing.
    11
  8.  @wessd  Way to miss the point, bud. It seems like he's embellishing his service record. Thunderf00t doesn't try to embellish who he is. He just demonstrates things. You don't have to hear his words as gospel. You can just verify the things yourself.
    10
  9.  @wtfjesus8251  I can drop a laptop faster than I can exit a bus.
    8
  10.  @acikusej  lolno The video is real. What you think you're seeing is fake.
    7
  11.  @acikusej  The Soviet Union would have some difficulty in denying anything today, it essentially ended in 1991.
    7
  12. ​ @miriamweller812  The random communist guy had attempted an assassination on a US Army general. He wasn't that random. He was a failure at life who failed to adjust to the Soviet Union when he lived there for a while. He tried to whack Edwin A. Walker, missed, and had left notes to his wife saying what he was about to do. That's not random. It's a pattern. Some guy tried to whack Reagan to impress Jodie Foster, now that's random.
    7
  13.  @Fung15  material irradiated does not become radioactive itself unless neutron bombardment turns the atoms into unstable isotopes. Food taken to space is irradiated to sterelize it, it does not become radioactive. I am sure the clothes are still radioactive not due to irradiation but dust and particles clinging to them.
    6
  14. Steam explosions in pressurized piping/vessels are common. The corium dipping into the water under the plant would have not flash boiled the entire pool.
    6
  15. He may think space is like Game of Thrones but personally I think it's more like Sopranos.
    5
  16.  @mastrtonberry2  facts and numbers can be used to manipulate a narrative. He straight up showed Hindenburg footage to complain about the venting of gas from a tank failure. I think hydrogen tanks are stupid but that's pure propaganda. Hindenburg happened, true fact. A car crash will not lead to a Hindenburg, sorry at that point showing the footage is comically desperate.
    5
  17.  @qapplor  China indeed bad. They were warned two years prior that a leak would happen in that lab unless they improved security.
    5
  18. Dark Lord Satan Europe has very weak freedom of speech. Look at the UK arresting people over jokes.
    4
  19.  @wannabeuk  Yeah, in tiny font after all the credits had rolled. After the film soundtrack is credited. Nobody watches that. You don't watch those credits. You don't actually care, you just want a reason to complain. And no, he's not passing it as his own work. At no point does the context of this video every agree with the claims made in the segments.
    4
  20.  @acikusej  No proof it was fake and the Soviet Union didn't deny it happened.
    4
  21.  @OhNotThat  The "source" is that in 2018 Medium asked Wayback Machine to remove articles that were archived there. Wayback Machine usually honors all requests to take down stuff if the copyright owner requests it and I guess Medium becomes the copyright owner.
    4
  22.  @t3nst  Occam's razor this one - the researcher known as "bat woman" who studied coronavirus worked at the lab close to the origin of the pandemic, coauthored papers with an American scientist who was part of the group that came out in an open letter claiming it couldn't be a lab leak.
    4
  23.  @joeyjojojrshabadoo7462  But if you're travelling for business or vacations in a city, you'll have espresso available almost anywhere. If I'm going to my country house where it's almost an hour drive through winding roads to the nearest village, I can simply leave a kitchen counter coffee machine there. If I'm camping... I don't get it, if I'm sleeping in a tent and eating camping-friendly food I'll take instantaneous or "cowboy coffee". But I get it, part of being successful is creating demand where there wasn't any. Well, I searched on youtube for hand pumped espresso and found a machine that looks like a bicycle pump. Sure, it's not as pretty and won't fit a purse unless you're also carrying your self-defense baton in there, but it's available for campers and travelers without requiring a 600,000 dollar crowdfunding campaign.
    4
  24.  @eclipsez0r  there's different kinds of "materials". Uranium with a half life of what, 700 million years? Thorium, more than a billion? Even plutonium cores were handled by hand. Now if you get exposed to short half-life elements they'll beam you at a much higher rate.
    3
  25. It does matter where it came from. The nation where it came from lied about it, used its influence with the WHO to delay response, and then hid the evidence. The reaction would be different if the culprit had fessed up and came clean about what was going on. It wouldn't have been true. We'd know what we were fighting. We were lead by uncertainty so we let everything get out of control. We'd have an immediate response and know exactly what to do rather than act like fools. Stuff was spreading and the WHO was saying it wasn't airborne... what a joke!
    3
  26. It's not a baseless conspiracy theory. It's an hypothesis.
    3
  27. What message? The rant about cellulose falls flat when you know that engineered viruses have be used already. Such as the Jansen vaccine.
    3
  28. Because almost nobody is trying to claim it was a weapon. DARPA was approached with a proposal to carry out research to help develop a vaccine for troops to deploy in the Pacific theater. They said F no, that kind of research is banned. So it was offshored to China. Much like BSL-4 labs have nasty pathogens so they can be studied and countered, that doesn't mean bioweapons are being developed there. The existence of a dangerous pathogen inside a lab doesn't mean ill intent. That's just where we store cultures.
    3
  29. ​ @Asfanboy1  I think you confused the 70s for the 90s.
    3
  30. Kemon Jones-Terry it's you who doesn't understand what a monopoly is. None of the competing websites have a chance to compete with YT. Monopoly doesn't mean only one company exists. It means only one controls so much market share it's impossible to defeat them at their own game.
    2
  31. ​ @RD-eh3tz  Yes. In Soviet countries and allied nations pilots were not trained like Western pilots. They were meant to enter combat by listening to instructions from ground controllers and only switch their radar on when taking the shot. Western pilots were handed a plan but given freedom to operate their aircraft, which means they got more training.
    2
  32. The issue is that there's probably a thousand people who are able to analyze and explain this, but they're not allowed to talk about it until they're cleared for it. So in the end someone in the official channels says "we confirm the footage is real and we haven't identified what it is" and people lose their minds.
    2
  33. They're not laying off. They're having trouble recruiting and getting people to reenlist after their contract.
    2
  34. ​ @memonk11  Bury. Not burn.
    2
  35.  @mathewpoole3589  14 people to power a generator that won't produce enough juice for a single household, seems legit.
    2
  36. ​ @mathewpoole3589  still doesn't make any sense. You're still asking of an entire community to contribute to something that will benefit very few because you won't be powering lighting for everyone, bug zappers fro everyone or hydroponics for everyone. Along with agricultural work or carrying water you're asking for people to sit down and power electricity for what? The time they spent pedaling could be used for actually useful labour that would purchase fuel to run generators.
    2
  37.  @mathewpoole3589  so I am ignorant because not everyone has access to fuel, okay. Where do the people who can't get fuel get the light bulbs, zappers, hydroponics stuff then? "With a couple of battery packs on hand" - mind that you're still speaking about people who CAN'T GET FUEL but somehow they're getting all the electronics stuff. "Nor are people so busy that they can't spare an hour" - the problem is, that hour is competing with another hour of labour that could bring more value to the self and to the community, or even an added hour of rest. It's not a matter of sparing. It's a matter of people preferring to use their time elsewhere. "Solar panels are no where near as consistent as grid power" - but way more convenient than human power.
    2
  38. Nobody's career is ended. They report UAPs, there's an investigation, some times they're identified. How can you say it's moving quickly if you can't tell the size or distance?
    2
  39. I woke up in the slums of Tatooine once, found my speeder standing on bricks. They took the anti-gravity drive.
    2
  40.  @zenaku666  Wait didn't TF have the Anita Sarkeesian arc?
    2
  41.  @eddiebruv  I might be wrong but I doubt West Point has an ornithology department.
    2
  42. Targeting pods are like a million bucks and take up a weapons hardpoint.
    2
  43.  @10100rsn  So aircraft would be wasting fuel (extra weight and drag) to bring a secondary pod that adds another 1 million to the price of an aircraft? Just because of some balloons and birds?
    2
  44. They don't clearly show anything of the sort.
    2
  45. Because laser glasses are rated for specific wavelengths (ranging from visible to infrared) while arc welding emits UV radiation. A laser that goes into your eye will be focused on the retina and damage phototeceptors, arc welding will cause a "sunburn" in your cornea.
    2
  46. Shit, attach the magnets to the spinning thing and make a perpetual motion machine. There's no way it will not work.
    2
  47. I guess being first at boiling a dog in space is a better achievment than putting man on the moon. Did the Soviets do the thing? Guess they couldn't. Womp womp.
    2
  48. Because of anti proliferation agreements, pressure from environmentalist groups and cost.
    2
  49.  @NguyenHongAnh152  the thing is, from what I understand getting from 0.7% U-235 to 20% is 3/4 of the work. So if you buy 20% from another nation in theory to make it 90% would require smaller facilities which could be easily hidden.
    2
  50. The 60 Minutes piece had segments aired outside the US too. Our media isn't "fact checking" and just reports on it uncritically.
    2