Comments by "" (@krollpeter) on "Dr. John Campbell"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
@Dermahon13 Sweden has not done any better than other countries, and not worse either. That with the herd immunity is a myths, it is mathematically impossible to get herd immunity in 6 months. You are asking for article links, but if it is written somewhere on the internet it's more worth than I said?
However here is an article from last month, it talks about 15 % herd immunity for Sweden. https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200813/swedens-no-lockdown-policy-didnt-achieve-herd-immunity
Now one months later I read somewhere it's about 20 %, but only around the Stockholm area.
Instead of using one single country as a prove for weird theories, look at all these countries such Taiwan, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Singapore, Vietnam, Thailand with their strict measures, and all of them fare comparable so much better. Just now in exactly this video you were given the opportunity to see the data of the Melbourne area and how draconian measures protected the rest of the country. But you keep on pulling out one single country and that's for your a prove of a tin foil hat theory. The problem with people like you, selectively chosing articles and stuff that confirm your believes, not acquiring knowledge.
You can't expect others to fill your lack of knowledge, you have to do that yourself. In particular in the last 6 - 8 weeks there are so many flat earthers and tin foil head theorists around. I connect this post also with the call to Dr. Campbell and others to take this finally serious now, and not continue ignoring this very serious problem.
2
-
Felipe Murillo Indeed, it is worth taking a closer look at Sweden's strategy. It is however wrong that they didn't do anything, as what some believe. Protecting the weak and vulnerable but at the same time accepting a certain risk for the young and healthy is not unreasonable to me. I do however believe the Swedish strategy does not fit everyone.
I do strongly oppose Dr. Campbell's position on what he calls euthanasia in Sweden. Euthanasia is the intentional ending of somebody's life to relieve pain and suffering. They did that in this cases where they believed that the person had not much life in front of him anyway, because of other serious sicknesses for example, and treating a heavy virus infection would not do anything for the patient anyway. One can criticise this, but I would be more careful doing so.
My father (87 yo) says to us, his family: "If it gets me let me die. I don't want to be in a hospital bed suffering this for weeks and connected to oxygen, and then later my lungs do not work anymore well, or such". Would you respect his wishes?
The UK and the USA are two countries where for too long nothing had been done, and then what was done was too weak, too little, and wrong. How about calling that murder? Just now at this very moment the numbers in Britain are soaring, but their response is weak.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2