Comments by "Lautaro Quiroga" (@LautaroQ2812) on "Brodie Robertson"
channel.
-
27
-
16
-
15
-
13
-
10
-
I am learning about it and I was kinda entertained getting to know a little bit of history and where "unix" and "GNU" came from, relating to Linux.
So from now on, while I am ok with anyone calling it what they want (which is the essence of this OS! We can do what we want!), I will start calling it G - N - U Linux. Not "Gnu".
So maybe some day I will get my own DT pissed 1 minute video.
Jokes aside, I do firmly believe that while GNU and knowing why it's there and what it means MATTERS... Tux and Linux is just plain better. The "Gnu" animal is so fucking dumb. Meanwhile the pengWings can look like secret agents. And the word is just cool. "Linux". It's simple, fast, catchy. If you want people to adopt, semantics on silly names are the least of your problems. And to make matters worse, even when "Linux" was a "novelty" 10 or 10+ years ago... for the regular person, it was "Linux, the one with the little penguin".
He got upset for a naming scheme he didn't respect himself.
Got upset for a personal tier list.
What's next? Maybe he does need to sleep.
8
-
8
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
After your video, I do not think they are doing open source (as you said, that's ok!) but I do worry. Maybe perhaps because of being ignorant, I thought "open source" was just... "Not proprietary closed code" on where people could look at it and know what was going on.
Again, perhaps I'm just ignorant, so maybe I don't represent others but I do feel that me, somewhat tech savvy and that I have dipped my toes into Linux before didn't understand this properly or didn't even know about "fair code" term or even that OSD definition (I didn't even know that existed), maybe other people won't either.
And I am South American, which means most people here across several countries (minus Brazil) speak Spanish. I've heard about "Linux", "Foss" and "Open source" since I was a teenager from some (computer class) teachers at school. But I've never heard anyone mention "fair code". Not growing up in school, not on the internet up until this moment (I'm almost 30). I will repeat at the risk of being annoying: perhaps it's just me. Perhaps I dropped the ball in... not seeing that? Or whatever you wanna call it.
But I feel the term Open Source goes around willy nilly a lot and I feel a lot of people don't take these guidelines of the term into account. And my gripe is that this wouldn't be brought up by the Microsofts of the world or the Googles. This is something mentioned over and over by people in the community or within the sphere. So the fact that this ISN'T a cemented definition engrained in people's brains as a default thing... in simpler terms and with a comedic twist I see it as "FOSS advocates still fight over the definition of the key characteristic of their software after 50 years".
I think this is a great conversation to be had openly and more frequently, and that people should "press" for this to be out there much more.
Edit: So if I understand correctly to summarize: Open Source is like super omega free with no restrictions no matter how sad you feel and fair code is anything as open source as it can be but you put in some restrictions. If this is correct, then this distinction needs to be more popular, I feel it's good to know.
4
-
4
-
I've been loving the challenge and all the reactions. I am both learning and noticing new things with each.
For example, now. Let's go:
- Linus doesn't know about apt on Manjaro but sets up a KVM. Also Linus, who is the master of hotkeys and shortcuts doesn't know you can refresh with... F5?. I've always used F5, I swear lol. I don't understand why you'd look for "refresh" in a contextual menu BEING LINUS. Being your mom or whatever it makes total sense; Kinda awesome your mom would know about refreshing.
That said, the fact that it isn't in the context menu is kind of a problem and dumb decision. Also, that said, I've been copying from SSD to HDD folders with 4.5Gbs of files (avg) and they're done in like... 2 minutes. And they would be much faster I think, if I had a better PC and more importantly, super fast SSDs like Linus probably does.
As for the printers, they both say and show what printers they have so I mean, go watch the video again? Lol
Linus talking about file extensions in previous videos and literally going "delete dis, .zip is done!" in this one was hilarious to me.
I also don't understand why that happened to Linus. As far as I'm aware, Manjaro ships with VLC. So that should've worked without problems. You recommend VLC, funnily enough Chris Titus recommends Celluloid because VLC works badly for him (and he shows it on the video). I tried both, they're ok. I tried Haruna too.
And yes, you can pretty much "configure" and "show alternatives" for almost everything on KDE. That's why I like it, and you can configure the show desktop button to minimize everything.
The "On the bottom" text is... a dumb complain. That's just him not liking it, is not an issue.
I moved from Manjaro yesterday because I didn't want to deal with "arch stuff", installed Zorin because it looked like it would do the job but then I realized I hate gnome and nautilus. So I just deleted again and installed KDE Neon lol. Still need to finish configuring it, but so far so good.
One of the biggest issues Manjaro has imo, even though it's very user friendly, is that Arch needs its own packages and then you have flats and snaps as well (and aur!). Is too much to keep track of if you run into problems later.
I like Dolphin a lot, though I do agree that there should be an option to get admin privileges, at least with a warning screen of "hey you gon break stuff if u done goof!".
3
-
3
-
3
-
Original comment, deleted because you kind of answered in video that can't be done at browser level:
Honest question, no judgment: Why do people like you, who use a "Different chrome" as browsers care about this so much? Don't you feel you are actually doing a disservice by using yet another chromium based browser? Are you afraid that even people who use Chromium Based browsers but not Chrome would get locked out? (I don't see this happening unless Google and Microsoft ally with each other? to not fuck each other over?).
You say commenting isn't enough, which I 100% agree, just like marching protests. But is the argument of being a "fork" enough to say you use "chromium but just a bit" and move on? Legitimate question as I have no knowledge about this. No real technical knowledge, I mean. It's the reason why I came back to Firefox (and consequently to Linux), despite the inconveniences.
Like if everyone used FF (or Safari) and nothing Chrome related (including Chromium), wouldn't that have much more weight into the web as a whole? (Not saying you HAVE to use FF, just posing the thought).
Edit: thinking of Edge, it's the only one that (natively) streams Netflix 1080p or up to 4K, for example. So I think this change would suit Msft to partner with Google. They just play pretend enemies.
New addition: We're fucked. Mozilla has been "exploring" the option for tab grouping for more than a year now. They push extensions as "the cool thing" instead of making it into the browser as a feature. They ship things like "pocket" which I guess some people use and others like me, don't. Thankfully you can remove it.
My country has 50% poverty and rampant crime where the legal system can't even act quick and swift enough to put criminals in jail (or not release them). I doubt we can do anything at all to have a say in a worldwide internet matter. I still believe that we could do our "grain of sand" part by switching browsers, which is what I have done. My doubts still remain: "In the hypothetical people do not use Chromium based things, would that help"?. That is maybe the main question I actually want to know the answer to. And I said we're fucked because as you said, people are not going to all switch to FF. Or protest. A lot of people just use Edge because it's right there and people like it or not, it's a good browser that works very well, minus Msft telemetry bs and Bing ads. I used it as main browser before switching and some of its stuff, I still miss. Other stuff, I do not.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Some people are tribal and annoying (or even aggressive/disrespectful) about it but at the end of the day, they do have a point from heart.
If you keep using Ubuntu, Canonical keeps existing. They keep adding Amazon stuff to it and/or snaps, which we all (or most of us) dislike. They keep driving things forward that are not really that great. And it would take a while for "normal people" if Linux got popular, to realize or even care since by nature, Linux already is not on your face all the time unlike Windows.
But if people were logical and spoke up whenever something's bad, they would not have to be using Linux in the first place, because Windows would be "good". Does what I'm trying to say make sense?
I'm not a Linux expert by any means, but if you're going to use Debian based, go with something simpler, if you do that and you go Ubuntu based sort of speak, why not go Mint directly? Imagine everyone coming to Linux using Ubuntu, and then it gets so popular it starts getting monetized with ads baked in just like Windows... "Linux" will have that image for majority of people regardless of how many distros you have or whatever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
For some reason, at 3:40 for like 20 seconds it goes to 190p and then comes back to 1080 xD weird
Can you please make a follow up video through EVERYTHING. You know, how you always do, going from one tab to another saying BUT, HOWEVER... PHON.
I keep saying people everywhere saying "use firefox, use firefox" ALL the time. But they have a somewhat lackluster development track record due to building other services, they don't even have tab grouping (a request made with like 2500 votes in the community forums over 2 years ago), they added telemetry which I personally don't mind that much, but I do like Brave's "sync chain" thing that doesn't connect to a server. They also get money from Google and started shipping Google as default search engine and got rid of other options. I remember they used to ship FF with you being able to select DDG, Ecosia, Qwant, etc. however now you can't (OOTB experience).
How is this any better, really? And people keep saying FF is fully open source. I had thought or at least I saw/heard somewhere maybe in some videos that the "client" was, but not the engine thus why we only have forks of FF but we never got a new browser using FF's engine.
It would be really cool if you laid everything out, even if it becomes a longer video because I feel no one talks about this or mention the cons of Mozilla/Firefox and they just push it out to the community like Google pushes Chrome when you go to their sites.
That said, responding to your question, just as I have hopped from distro to distro, I've done so with browsers. From IE (lol, really) to Legacy Edge, New Edge, Chrome and almost everything else except Safari.
For a long time I've used and loved Firefox (still think their logo is THE BEST AND MOST BEAUTIFUL EVER, I just want to press it), but after a while it got stagnant and then all the reasons I stated above. I see no point using the browser that once was god tier and freed people from IE that is now an excuse made by a company that holds a bunch of activist hippies that don't do anything useful.
So now I use Brave. I wasn't using it because their UI was fucking garbage. Now that they have changed it into something usable and modern, I have no issues for the most part. The crypto stuff... eh. I just remove/disable and call it a day. I wish it wasn't there but what can you do. And I do miss the customizability of Firefox. Other than that I guess this is fine.
Edit: Like as a closing final point... Firefox is getting traction again because it's the best worst option due to everything else using Chromium and due to Google being worse than garbage, but not because themselves have made good strides forward and thus the community likes the features/changes. And that is my biggest gripe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BrodieRobertson I don't. I agree it would be AWESOME. But if you go to supermarket A, and buy a can of sliced pineapple, and then you go to another supermarket B and try to get the same can, they are not going to let you leave without paying, lol.
This is the exact same thing. One thing is OWNING THE PRODUCT, which if you buy directly from the devs, then it would make sense you could run it as many times and anywhere you want that is supported.
But Steam, Xbox (Msft store), PlayStation... are publishers. Are that, stores. So you have to buy it again, because you're buying in that store. Your example in the video was perfectly clear and it made sense. Linus is being stupid, which is bad considering he's pretty smart on a lot of things and has a lot of data about business that we don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I understand the sentiment in the first part of the video and agree somewhat but I feel it leaves out the nuance of the inherent problem of this game or these projects.
Minecraft is a generic name, clearly on purpose. It's an 8 bit block looking world game, you have mines, you craft. Mix them. The end. I don't wanna sound too South American but... Minecraft is the videogame equivalent to "basketball" or "football" XD imo. Like it doesn't have identity either. What happened was it became the most popular game ever (more or less than Tetris, I can't remember).
So for the FOSS one, they are tackling not just a genre but basically an IP. And there is no way around that. Like for example if you wanted to do a school of magic... wow "a wizardy school". Where did we hear that one before? Well no, HOLD ON. This isn't Harry Potter... this is a bit more traditional, classical fantasy stuff. Dragons and... no, hold on, it's NOT LORD OF THE RINGS. Ok what if we make it in the future instead? I SWEAR IT'S NOT STAR WARS MAN, SHUT UP.
Of course I'm joking and there are ways you can take certain things from these and not make it the same, but at some point or another, there are going to be overlaps just because of how massive and encompassing these IPs already are. Same for Minecraft which for this case, is basically "the only game" in that genre (it's not, but when you consider the nuance of popularity... it's basically the only one). And if it sounds like a duck, walk like a duck and looks like a duck... it's a duck.
The rebrand is pretty good itself, but to be honest it's just a made up name. It could be anything else and it could be just as good, just for the fact that it goes away from the "block", "mine" and "craft" part - which in turn also makes any other made up name generic. It is a short name, if it picks up people will remember (maybe) but is not catchy to the point where "it makes sense". At the same time, to give credit to them, there is a trillion dollar cunt company that is just called "Fruit". Picking a name is pretty damn hard.
[edit: had just woken up and the above and below paragraphs kinda contradict each other and thought it was funny so I leave it this way instead of making it better]
For how hard this would be, Luanti is pretty fucking good imo but like I said, unless you read the explanation, it does sound like a made up word. It also could've been any fancy word as the name of one of the precious metals or minerals in the game or in the (real) world. Because why not. "Lazuli" is as short and samey as "Luanti", to an extent. With the explanation, I prefer Luanti of course.
And looking at the thing today, as a "platform" not just a game... it went from "we're testing minecraft" to "we're becoming roblox"? Again, not bashing the contributors for this one but it proves my previous point. It's now a platform, it has a ton of things being worked on and games being made on it, etc... that's Roblox (as far as I know).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1