Comments by "D Mc" (@dmc8092) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. +Alexander Hawk I think it's fun that you chose to focus on that.
    1
  2. +Alexander Hawk Also, Dave is a liberal, so, there's that.
    1
  3. I think that McCain's judgement will always be questionable just for the fact that he put Sarah Palin into national politics and gave her whatever legitimacy she has.
    1
  4. Bill Gates is in favor of higher taxes for the one percent.
    1
  5. Science is a leftist conspiracy? What a moron.
    1
  6. He lost me on his first argument comparing climate change to eugenics (and, actually, nazism).
    1
  7. Are "Judea Christian Values" a real thing? Why does there have to be something not open to debate?
    1
  8. The thing about this is, that sometimes people really are bigots, and while it's true that the regressive left does use these terms to stifle conversation just as the right uses words like "communist", "socialist', "liberal" etc... bigots can use your condemnation of calling people bigots as a shield when someone rightfully calls them on their bigotry. I think rather than condemn the use of the words, it's better to disagree publicly when you think the words are misused.
    1
  9. ***** From pretty much every libertarian when they say they don't think there should be any government regulations.
    1
  10. ***** Because, they always say that businesses won't poison their customers because they wouldn't be able to stay in business so we don't need the government to ensure that their products are safe--as though businesses haven't poisoned their customers for years. They say businesses will do the right thing so they can stay in business--which anyone who has paid attention to history knows isn't true.
    1
  11. ***** See, and this is where Libertarians lose it. They just want businesses to be able to do whatever they want and hope for the best. It won't work. All this philosophy is meaningless when confronted with the real world.
    1
  12. ***** They lose it by not trying to prevent people from poisoning others. It's better never to be poisoned at all than to have the people who poisoned you go to jail after you're dead. And people are punished for poisoning people now, so what's the point of libertarianism?
    1
  13. ***** You never started debating. Just like most libertarians you use philosophies that aren't based on the real world and then call people stupid when you can't support your cause. Why don't all you libertarians get together, come up with a workable model and then get back to us.
    1
  14. I don't actually find him funny.
    1
  15. Sam got GI Joes and He-Mans? I had to play with spools and I'd color costumes on them with my Crayons.
    1
  16. Giving lip service to climate change is better than complete denial. Also, after this election whether she likes it or not she has to tow a certain line for the Bernie Sanders supporters.
    1
  17. Um, the popular vote was for Hillary, not Trump. Do a little research Dave.
    1
  18. +Dave Who said that? I mean, other than you?
    1
  19. Islet of Langerhans Well, maybe they are.  Don't be dense.
    1
  20. Dave But you're not racist at all. 
    1
  21. But I do love it when racists defend black people who have been called "Uncle Tom" by other black people.
    1
  22. Islet of Langerhans So, instead of trying to put words in my mouth why don't you just think about it quietly.
    1
  23. I agree with Pellegrino about abortion rights, but not funding.
    1
  24. I love Arbys. Beef n' Cheddar.
    1
  25. Wait. the people he's appointing to his cabinet are conjecture?
    1
  26. Trump has never engaged in a real debate or honest discussion. He says nothing.
    1
  27. Linus Fedora Tips Every debate, speech and tweet Trump has ever done.
    1
  28. I guess all the interviews can't be winners.
    1
  29. California is about to go bankrupt?
    1
  30. She's not against a law that would require her to go into a men's restroom?
    1
  31. Why can't we judge him on what he did during the election?
    1
  32. The reason Christians aren't helping these people is not because they're afraid of being called bigots. It's that Christians--especially in this country have been co-opted by xenophobic conservatives.
    1
  33. Interesting. But I do see why it's a problem when philosophers talk about science.
    1
  34. +Seth A and by "not interesting" you mean you don't agree with him.
    1
  35. Very interesting. I don't think he's completely correct on every single point but I like the general message.
    1
  36. What big brave men Milo and his attack goons are. Relentlessly going after an actress for having the nerve to get cast in a movie. How courageous they are. And this is exactly what he wanted. He's been suspended before, he knows the twitter rules. He gets far more publicity crying victim for being banned than he does for his numerous racist tweets. I'm sorry Dave, but as much as I admire your stance against the regressive left getting in bed with these alt-right cowards is not doing your message any favors.
    1
  37. Milo wanted to be banned from Twitter. It's what he's been pushing for. I think it was a mistake to ban him but it was what he wanted and now his bad ideas (and most of his ideas are bad) have gained attention.
    1
  38. m0ZZaik misspoke
    1
  39. m0ZZaik I misspoke, I meant Objectivism.
    1
  40. m0ZZaik Because it means that for it to work people have to act rationally. The idea that all it means is that people can be and are irrational isn't actually the problem with the philosophy, it's that for Libertarianism to work people have to be rational--and they're not.
    1
  41. fab006 Which seems pretty obvious so I don't know why people find it revolutionary--except that I haven't seen her followers react that way either.
    1
  42. fab006 The entanglement between objectivism and capitalism just won't work. The aim of capitalism is to make money and the idea that capitalists will act rationally rather than just out of immediate gratification is not supported by history.
    1
  43. +Solitaire Citizen This would be easy to research. Why don't you do a study, go out and ask atheists to explain evolution. You might be surprised. And you know what that process of disproving your hypothesis is? Science.
    1
  44. Put it to the test Solitaire Citizen. Go out, find some random atheists and ask them to explain evolution. This is easy to do.
    1
  45. Mephistahpheles No. There is evidence for evolution.
    1
  46. Arturo Luna Also, if evolution wasn't true things like medicine and vaccinations wouldn't work--something else you could learn about while you're taking in actual education and not just creationist obfuscations.
    1
  47. Mephistahpheles And you are not informed about evolution. Get informed and then talk to me.
    1
  48. cloudazer Also, considering your supercilious tone you should not be pointing the finger at anyone and calling them "haughty".
    1
  49. cloudazer Actually, you did say that.
    1
  50. cloudazer And the fact you're claiming you didn't just shows how dishonest you are.
    1