Comments by "D Mc" (@dmc8092) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. This is a great interview. So much more detail than we usually get. Not about pointing fingers but about enlightening.
    2
  2. "You don't get to judge it"? That's what makes me think Steele is an idiot.
    2
  3. People say that?
    2
  4. If someone says that they are assholes, but I don't think it's as common as you seem to.
    2
  5. The dismissing people as cisgendered is weird considering that Islam is not supportive of transgender either.
    2
  6. Asha2820 That is interesting.  I guess a cisgendered gay man is more threatening to the culture there.
    2
  7. TheSovereign500 Does the more immediate threat come from the left? How so? When you consider that Trump has put a gag order on scientists keeping them from reporting their findings are you seriously saying the threat is coming from the left?
    2
  8. jdnels81 Wait for what? He's already done it. What do you need to wait for? He's not just paying lip service to the right, he's doing what they want him to do. There are actions that you can look at and see what he's done.
    2
  9. He's already interviewed him. And Molyneux is really not as brilliant as his followers think he is.
    2
  10. +ShermKlump That douche accusation is a double edged sword in this case.
    2
  11. Gregory Bannish I've also never thought Piers Morgan was particularly a leftist.
    2
  12. Alexander Nevsky He said the right is engaged in a discussion of policy. He said the left is in love with the idea of the strongman and the right isn't (which is completely disproven by the right's current hero worship of Ronald Reagan. That's two things I remember without watching it again.
    2
  13. ***** I'm fine with ignoring you from now on.  I guess with free speech idiots like you get to speak freely too.
    2
  14. Wake up to what?
    2
  15. I think the left and the outrage has gone too far--but I also think that actual bigots use Dave Rubin and his videos as cover for their actual bigotry. Dave will have to address this at some point but it seems he blocks people who try to address it like Eiynah at Polite Conversations.
    2
  16. Dave, if you're going to say what Trump did wasn't so bad you should be a little more clear on what he did.
    2
  17. Jesse Sewell You're saying that Jerry Coyne is irrational?
    2
  18. Jesse Sewell It seems like the whole Trump campaign was based on the idea that America is deeply flawed so it seems like you can't paint just the left with that brush. And you also can't call faith rational because it is belief in something when there is no proof of it.
    2
  19. Sinus Wutz I oppose circumcision but I don't think men's rights groups are nearly as interested in ending it as they are in complaining that feminists don't work as hard ending it as they think they should.  It may very well be equally important but it's not feminists who are circumcising children--it's religions and medical authorities who are certainly not feminists.  If MRAs did more to stop circumcision or prison rape I might support them--but they don't.
    2
  20. mr pleb Why don't men's rights advocates speak to these issues?  If they would spend even a tiny percentage of the time they spend complaining about feminists actually trying to educate about circumcision or prison rape or stop and frisk or any number of issues that affect men adversely maybe something would get done about them. 
    2
  21. bellarose I don't think this "female community" you're talking about is a real thing.  I think you have some people who agree with you who are female and you're applying those opinions to a "community".   You don't know what lgbt people do (and by the way, the "ls" are all women) so you get all your info from highly biased sources.
    2
  22. Would you want to officially change your sex? It won't be an issue for you because you're not transgender. Why does it matter to you if someone else officially changes their sex?
    2
  23. Do you mean that a male to female athlete would have an unfair advantage in women's sports? Kind of a narrow scope. Just saying "I don't see why they should be able to do this" isn't an argument.
    2
  24. How are you being forced to do anything? You can't be arrested for refusing to accept that someone is transgender.
    2
  25. What does that have to do with whether someone can legally change their gender? He had the right to do that and the other girls have the right to protest this if they want to.
    2
  26. There are stalls in bathrooms. As far as locker rooms go most transgender people are in more danger than non-transgender people.
    2
  27. Has that bill actually passed? I'm having trouble finding any actual information on it because of all the hysterical right wing blogs.
    2
  28. Do you really think that we will ever live in a world where female sports will be dominated by transgenders? Also, in wrestling they have weight classes so the transgender wrestler would be competing against athletes of a similar size.
    2
  29. Have people actually been fined? I can't find any unbiased sources on this. From what I could find in the actual Canadian government documents the bill hasn't even passed yet.
    2
  30. A debate is not actually proof and from what I've read Jordan Peterson has misrepresented the law all along. I've now had people tell me that it has passed and people have been fined but I have been unable to find any non-right wing source for any of this. If what people are saying is true then it's a horrible law but from what I've read of the law it doesn't do what people are saying. I know Canada has different law than the US but I haven't been able to find any confirmation that this law jails or fines people for not using the right pronouns.
    2
  31. +talsapps I don't know. The fact that someone's a lawyer doesn't automatically make them right or honest. Also, considering how you misrepresented the other story I'm a little skeptical of your grasp of what's happening.
    2
  32. +RanEcnounter Can you point to a case where someone was fined or jailed for using the wrong pronoun? Again, I don't care if people sue. People have the right to sue if they think they have a case. Has anyone been fined or jailed for using the wrong pronoun?
    2
  33. +RanEncounter I have done several searches and not come up with anything. Why don't you tell me the names of the specific cases or the plaintiffs so I can find them. Keep in mind, I only want cases where someone was fined or jailed for calling someone by the wrong pronoun.
    2
  34. +RanEncounter I asked for a single example of a case where someone was FINED OR JAILED and you still haven't provided this. If you can't I understand. You don't want to admit it because that would fuck with your narrative. But until you can I don't really care to hear anymore of your whiny bullshit. This does not force you to do anything at all. Most likely transgender people avoid you so you never have to refer to them in any way.
    2
  35. A lawyer who was so important you can't even come up with her name. Considering the way you completely misrepresented the story about the wrestler I don't have great confidence in your abilities to present facts. And I read these articles on several Canadian news sites. None of the people posting on this seem to be able to come up with any examples of anyone being prosecuted under this law who had to pay a fine or do jail time for calling someone by the wrong pronoun. Until you can come up with even one example I don't see the need to continue rewarding your lack of research ability.
    2
  36. ***** I didn't mention David in this post.  Why would you think I'm talking about him?
    2
  37. 19:30 - Is it Cenk?
    2
  38. ***** San Harris is a liberal. Whether he does politics or not, he's a liberal.
    2
  39. Kaname Tōsen We'd hate for facts to get in the way of someone's freedom to say whatever they want and not have anyone say they're wrong.
    2
  40. Duck Speaker So you're just here posting random things? Great. Now I can ignore you.
    2
  41. +JT Faisa What failed healthcare initiative was that?
    2
  42. Maxime Laneville Did you see the news story where Trump wondered why we can't just nuke our enemies? It's a stupid thing that Trump actually wondered--not a stupid thing that someone just made up about Hillary Clinton. You need to pay more attention to actual things and not the fantasies in your head.
    2
  43. +psychoh13 I think Straughan, while good on current issues has a shaky hold on history.
    2
  44. psychoh13 She claimed that men were going to just give women the right to vote so the suffragettes were unnecessary. 
    2
  45. psychoh13 This is all guessing. The fact is that women were given the right to vote because they demanded it. To pretend otherwise is dishonest.
    2
  46. psychoh13 Your argument sounds similar to the right wingers who say that slavery would have ended eventually. We don't know that this is true and there's no way to prove it. One thing that is true is that justice delayed is justice denied.
    2
  47. psychoh13 To dismiss what these women did is just ignorant of history. I didn't compare it to slavery, I compared your reaction to the reaction of people who try to dismiss the work of the abolitionists.
    2
  48. psychoh13 But, also, thank you for proving that it's not just Staughan who's ignorant about history.
    2
  49. psychoh13 She dismisses it, and so do you. I think it's fine to say that many modern feminists have gone to far and to point at the excesses of the movement but to dismiss the accomplishments of past feminists is just naive. 
    2
  50. psychoh13 Because at one time women were not allowed to own property and anything they owned was considered the property of their husband. If the man chose to sell the property he would have been able to even if the wife didn't want to.
    2