Comments by "F Liu" (@F_Liu) on "Alexander Mercouris"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@agentorange6085 LOL, before I could respond to you, you need to review your historical knowledge of China, I know you have been brainwashed by your Western media and school textbooks with the false versions of Chinese history, but there is no point to even debate with you further if you outright claim that Hong Kong, a territory which the British handed back to China in 1997, was not a part of China historically, then why did the British return it back to China? The British robbed off Hong Kong after it bombed China's shores because China was preventing them from forcing tons and tons of opium down the the Chinese throats!
Just in case you are too lazy to read history books, let me put the record straight for you. Hong Kong was a part of China since Qin dynasty from 2nd century BC. Some islands and their territory waters in the South China Sea were part of China since the Ming dynasty from 1300s. Taiwan was made an official province of Qing China in early 1600s with early migration to the island starting from the 1300s. Tibet was a part of China since mid 1200s when it was incorporated into the Yuan dynasty during the Mongol rule, and FYI, Tibet was liberated by the PLA more than 70 years ago from Western imperialists who were occupying part of it.
I know your job is to spread false anti China narrative online, but at least do it better and also get a better username, don't make it too obvious, and up your history knowledge as well, otherwise it is very hard to take you seriously.
Lastly words are cheap, don't wait until China becomes too strong to get rid of it, if this is your ultimate goal, then what are you waiting for, why don't you start now? As if you and your words matter one tiny bit, LOL. And one more piece of very important information for you: The Chinese communist party enjoys a overwhelming 90% support of the Chinese people, that is the kind of support any Western government would dream of. And good luck rallying the Chinese to be on the side of the Western imperialists. They have fought them off before and they will do it again if they have to.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Did you know China and India were responsible for producing more than half of all world GDP exporting products on high demand to the West long before the West became fully industrialised? Did you know that a big part of the reason why the US approached China at the end of the 70s was because the US wanted China to help to win the cold war with USSR? It is boring to read Westerners keep saying China's success was largely the result of direct Western investments, because this is a superbly ignorant claim, and it shows your serious lack of understanding of China and its history. China does NOT feel that it is entitled to global leadership as it is never China's aim you believe it or not, China in fact would never want to replace the position of the US and would be happy to continue seeing the US as the world superpower, because it actually could benefit a great deal from it and China also knows how costly it is to be in the position of the ''world police''.
I am Chinese, so how I understand what China is doing is this: it is testing the Americans to see what its bottom lines are, to find out what the US' core interests are at the moment, would economical interests and benefits by continue to work and invest China greater than the need to contain China? The US will have to strike a balance, China wants to see how far would the US go to contain China, and how far would it still fancy to work with China, in my opinion, unfortunately, the US economy and population needs China now more than ever, and without China's help in supplying cheap goods and buying the US debts, your president could lose the election, so hence China's confidence, the confidence comes from the current economical strength rather than sense of entitlement, the later is a Western concept, China plays the long game, and would never get overly cocky for no good reason. And I can assure you China would never fall into this ''trap'', China still needs stability for its economical growth because this is the condition for its long term development, China has been patient for many many decades and there is no reason to change.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@simonbeck3701 LOL, as if the West has recognised and obeyed the international law this whole time. The West is maintaining the ''rule of law'' only if it suits its geopolitical interests, stop making it sound like they have been a force for good, you invaded and occupied countries and killed millions in the name of freedom, human rights and democracy, but anyone with half of brain knows it is all about robbing resources from a country where its own people could have enjoyed them and maintaining a geopolitical advantage in a particular region.
It is even more laughable to claim China is an expansionist, when the West is the true expansionist with all of its ''new territories'' created by expansionism or imperialism at a horrific human cost to the indigenous people. The US is the country that has 800+ military bases all around the world, not China. None of the Western countries has any claim over any of the islands in the South CHINA Sea, but insists to intervene purely to demonstrate its hegemonic rule by military aggression. You are not there to defend the ''rule of the sea'', you are there to create trouble for China and divisions between the countries in that region which is not welcomed, several countries who hold claims over that area of the sea have clearly expressed this. But that is what the West is good at, stirring up tension and conflicts wherever they go and make these regions unstable and weak so they could dominate. But the West is a diminishing power now and could not even win a war with a country like Afghanistan, but if the West insists to provoke for another war, then I hope they are ready as China today is no longer the one that was suffering badly under the oppressive Western imperialism centuries ago, and the world has had quite enough of the hegemonic domination of the West.
China does not own the South China Sea, but owns some of the islands and its territory waters and their ownership began before the West even became a relevant power. If the West has not continuously threaten the security of that region of the sea, then there wouldn't be a need to develop and improve military facilities on these islands, The West does not belong to that region, but it could not see that region thrive in peace because it could not accept a world of equal powers and multilateralism.
And about the UK, it is quite shameless, for once an opium smuggling country who committed mass murder and sufferings of Chinese to think it represents a force for good, it is only there to show as if it is still relevant as a former imperialist power, it is one of the very few Western countries who is stupid enough to risk its relationship with China only to go along with US, a current imperialist empire with their last attempts to maintain their hegemonic rule before they will be completely abandoned by the rest of the world, which make up the vast majority of the world population.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1