Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "Mueller Ends Probe, No Further Indictments, Hands Materials to AG Barr, Leftist Damage Control" video.

  1. https://hillreporter.com/stop-acting-like-the-mueller-report-has-vindicated-trump-28483
    3
  2.  @DiabloSpiritus  You have a lot of misplaced optimism for a delusional, thin-skinned con man who picks fights with dead people and whose approval rating at any given point in his presidency was never higher than his predecessor. I'm sure the fact that I don't buy Styx's bullshit comes across to you as being "triggered," but how does anyone here honestly believe that even if Trump wasn't guilty of collusion or conspiracy to commit collusion, he would be completely innocent of everything else?
    2
  3.  @perrymaria01  Trump's approval rating is lower than Obama's was at this point in his presidency, and Trump is still the focus of the SDNY investigation (along with over a dozen others). Do you really, seriously believe that you're going to wake up on November 4, 2020 to read that Trump won re-election? Conservatives threw a cow about Hillary's wrongdoings, but you look at Trump, who is guilty of just as much if not worse, and you go "Eh, nobody's perfect"?
    2
  4.  @DiabloSpiritus  No. If Trump gets re-elected, that's entirely on a failed education system.
    2
  5.  @DiabloSpiritus  Right, like Trump isn't a conspiracy theorist. This isn't liberals moving goalposts; this is liberals saying that Trump hasn't been vindicated for various reasons that should be obvious to anyone who conducts even the smallest amount of research. The contents of the report haven't been made public, a sitting president can't be indicted, and even if Trump wasn't guilty of collusion, that's not the same thing as him being not guilty of anything else. He tried to fire the Special Counsel and asked Russia ON CAMERA to hack Hillary's emails. Meanwhile, Trump and several other members of his administration have been using unofficial communication tools. You know, like what Trump thought Hillary should be in prison for doing. Nothing is being denied. Trump is a criminal. And there might not be anything even remotely resembling a meltdown if you took that even a little bit seriously.
    2
  6.  @DiabloSpiritus  Is this seriously a joke to you? Are you so obsessed with "owning the libs" that you're willing to overlook the fact that you support an actual criminal?
    2
  7.    If it were completely up to me, someone other than Hillary would've gotten my vote. But if you're going to insist Hillary be held accountable for her actions while making excuses for Trump's actions, then you don't really care for accountability, do you?
    2
  8.    First of all, you're repeating the same mistake as everyone in 2016 who insisted Trump couldn't possibly win. We're over a year and a half away from the 2020 election and you're already so sure that the subject of 16 criminal investigations will win. He could, but if he doesn't, I guarantee you'll be making excuses for it so you don't have to admit you backed the wrong horse. Secondly, I'm not pretending Hillary has a spotless record, but no criminal charges were ever filed against her. I wouldn't argue if you had good, valid reasons for why there should have been charges filed. However, if you do that, it wouldn't change the fact that even before the Trump administration lost over 90% of lawsuits over illegal policy changes, Trump was variously sued for fraud, housing discrimination (by the Justice Department no less), and not paying workers. Finally, Hillary isn't the president. Trump is. I'm all for holding her accountable for wrongdoings, but we shouldn't just pick and choose who gets held responsible. Otherwise, what's the point of having a representative government?
    2
  9. gabriel What’s wrong? I thought your Dear Leader loved the poorly educated
    2
  10. gabriel Calling someone a faggot is something you do when you have less maturity than a middle school bully, which means even the First Lady’s anti-bullying initiative is a failure. This is not a game and the fact that a quasi-sentient hemorrhoid like you treats it as one benefits nobody.
    2
  11. gabriel Project much, Hannity?
    2
  12. hr 777 Because no one here has presented it
    2
  13. BaltimoreAndOhioRR Are you just going to point to random Democrats and accuse them of election interference without evidence?
    2
  14. It wasn't funny the first time. Last time I checked, it's not the 1800s and anyone who thinks we should bring back slavery doesn't vote Democrat.
    1
  15.  @geoffwaller8571  It isn't. There was a political paradigm shift throughout the early to mid 20th century, so the Democrats who owned slaves are not the same as the Democrats that exist today. Further, if anyone does think we should bring back slavery, I guarantee they're not voting Democrat.
    1
  16. https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2019/03/22/trump-defenders-underestimate-the-mueller-report-by-touting-no-indictments/#174e8b91529a
    1
  17. https://hillreporter.com/stop-acting-like-the-mueller-report-has-vindicated-trump-28483
    1
  18. https://hillreporter.com/stop-acting-like-the-mueller-report-has-vindicated-trump-28483
    1
  19. https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2019/03/22/trump-defenders-underestimate-the-mueller-report-by-touting-no-indictments/#174e8b91529a
    1
  20. Your president would still be a criminal
    1
  21.  @fammader96  The Benghazi investigation turned up nothing on Hillary and no criminal charges were filed in response to her emails, but Trump is on camera telling Russia to hack his opponent's emails and multiple people in his campaign staff were either indicted or arrested for lying about ties to Russia and you cry "witch hunt"?
    1
  22.  @robertom2744  Are you kidding me?! How is no one here taking Trump's criminal record seriously?
    1
  23.  @weswolever7477  The border wall will be too.
    1
  24. https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2019/03/22/trump-defenders-underestimate-the-mueller-report-by-touting-no-indictments/#361e5130529a
    1
  25. You seriously think collusion would be the only crime Trump ever committed?
    1
  26.  @BaltimoreAndOhioRR  Conspiracy to commit collusion definitely is. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371
    1
  27.  @BaltimoreAndOhioRR  Seriously? Rudy Giuliani said on TV that the Trump Tower meeting was intended to collect dirt on Hillary. Did you forget about that? What about the email chain Don Jr. tweeted out? "The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father." Does that not raise a red flag? Or how about when Trump said ON CAMERA "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing"? None of that sounds like conspiracy to violate election laws, which prohibit foreign nationals from contributing any “thing of value” to an electoral campaign? None at all?
    1
  28. ​ @BaltimoreAndOhioRR  The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 bans foreign nationals "from making expenditures to expressly advocate the election or defeat of a political candidate." It's also stated in 52 U.S. Code § 30121 that it "shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value...in connection with a federal, state, or local election." If the Russians aimed to shape the outcome of the presidential election, that would meet the BCRA's definition of an expenditure. And you don't get dirt on an opponent unless you think you can use it to help you win, which makes dirt on an opponent a "thing of value" according to the U.S. Code. Whether gathering dirt on an opponent is illegal or not just by itself, recruiting foreign entities to help gather dirt is illegal because it's conspiracy to break federal election law. So when Trump asked Russia to help find Hillary's emails, and when Manafort gave polling data to an individual with ties to Russian intelligence (which would've influenced how Russian nationals spent money on U.S. election efforts), that was indeed a criminal act. And by the way, this is stuff I found online in, like, ten minutes. Don't call me an idiot when I'm still putting in more effort than you.
    1
  29.  @swt8866  The only crime except conspiracy, lying to Congress, bank fraud, obstruction of justice, and everything else Trump and his administration have committed.
    1
  30. Rose Quartz How is that the same thing as Trump being vindicated?
    1
  31. Kaizen Says the guy whose side lost their minds when Obama put on a tan suit
    1
  32.  @brettvv7475  My point is that I have difficulty taking your side when I have a very clear memory of every meaningless controversy conservatives invented during the Obama administration (e.g. Obama was born in Kenya, Obama eats Dijon mustard, Obama salutes while holding a cup of coffee). Not to suggest he never made any mistakes ever, but I at least had a sense that he wasn't a conspiracy theorist who got into pointless Twitter feuds with dead people.
    1
  33.  @ptolemy3444  The truth is that your Dear Leader is a criminal, collusion or not.
    1
  34.  @GlockamoleG17  Did you forget the Democrats won the House of Representatives in 2018? Or that time they kicked Roy Moore's ass in Alabama?
    1
  35.  @ptolemy3444  Ugh, you people keep using that term wrong. Unless you're playing a silent protagonist, every character in a video game has repeated lines. And if spouting someone else's opinion makes you an NPC, how do I know that's not the case with you and Styx?
    1
  36.  @ptolemy3444  Congratulations on being an individual. Have a fucking cookie.
    1
  37.  @ptolemy3444  Congrats, but I think you should be making Geico ads right about now.
    1
  38.  @brettvv7475  Styx's side
    1
  39.  @brettvv7475  That's a surprise to you?
    1
  40.  @brettvv7475  No, he definitely has a side. I spoke with him personally through Twitter DMs and I get the extremely strong impression that nine times out of 10, his side will be whatever stance pisses off Democrats and/or liberals the most.
    1
  41.  Kingy B  You mocked the media for being so sure that Hillary would win. You do realize you're repeating that mistake, right? Right?
    1
  42. Kingy B Trump committed bank fraud and Styx and people on his side act like Trump has been declared innocent of everything. And you think liberals are the irrational ones?
    1
  43.  @brettvv7475  If you say so.
    1
  44.  Kingy B  Manafort was arrested for bank fraud. Just saying.
    1
  45.  Kingy B  I'm not so naive as to think news outlets never lie, but we're very much in a "pot calling the kettle a liar" scenario with Trump.
    1
  46. https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2019/03/22/trump-defenders-underestimate-the-mueller-report-by-touting-no-indictments/#174e8b91529a
    1
  47. https://hillreporter.com/stop-acting-like-the-mueller-report-has-vindicated-trump-28483
    1
  48. https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlestiefer/2019/03/22/trump-defenders-underestimate-the-mueller-report-by-touting-no-indictments/#174e8b91529a
    1
  49. https://hillreporter.com/stop-acting-like-the-mueller-report-has-vindicated-trump-28483
    1