Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "Politico Prays for a Recession to Stop Trump in 2020" video.

Says the guy who thinks the tariffs are a good idea.
2
@Johnnycdrums https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-tariffs-on-china-boomerang-on-american-manufacturers-rbc-contends-2019-06-24
2
"Party of treason" should be reserved for the party that controlled every branch of government for two years after an election in which a hostile foreign power interfered and did nothing to punish them for it.
1
@cccCCCccc123ccc They didn't find nothing. They found that Russia interfered in a federal election to help Trump win and that he made multiple attempts to obstruct justice. They didn't have enough exculpatory evidence to exonerate Trump of obstruction, but they couldn't indict because they were following the DOJ policy that a sitting president can't be indicted. Wow, you're a moron.
1
@RJStockton If you're that much of a useless waste that you have to call people "faggot" to feel superior, shut up and stick to kissing Trump's ass. You'll never be good at anything else anyway.
1
@Nehfarius Do you genuinely believe this hatred of Trump started the day he announced his candidacy? I'll let you in on a secret: it didn't. He was a scumbag before 2015, and if it looks to you like the left is going insane, it might be because he still is a scumbag and people like you make excuses for him no matter how incompetent he is or how destructive his policies are.
1
If by "praying for a recession," you mean "pointing out that the economy has been slowing down," then yes.
1
E Cox I read the article Styx posted. How does it not read like Politico simply reporting on predictions?
1
@barahng The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis measured 2018 GDP growth at 2.9 percent, matching the peak in 2015. How is that "higher than under Obama"? But I get your point. I do remember one commentator saying he hoped the president would fail. Oh wait, that was Limbaugh about Obama. Why would this be any different, exactly?
1
Are you an expert on the economy? If not, how would you know?
1
Who are you to act like you love America? You hate everyone in it.
1
@richardmetzger2574 Liberals, moderates, intellectuals, activists, pacifists, minority groups, unions, etc. These are all demographics your side hates. Yet instead of saying "No, we don't," you double down. Way to go.
1
@chrisprobst6963 He still is, in the sense that the Russians interfered in a federal election and Trump makes no effort to keep them from doing it again.
1
@redneckbear8090 That's not how sexual identity works. I know, I've met transgender people.
1
@White Tiger Did you forget the Tea Party rallies?
1
@redneckbear8090 Dysphoria and transgenderism are two very different things. The American Psychiatric Association is very clear about that. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/gender-dysphoria/what-is-gender-dysphoria
1
@zigzag1630 I don't have a girlfriend, you prick. https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/is-collusion-a-crime.html
1
@zigzag1630 1. That's not a self-own. That's me pointing out that you're a lying prick, you moron. And whether or not I have a girlfriend shouldn't matter to you anyway. 2. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html Do you see the word "collusion" in here? No, you don't, because you clearly didn't read it or the full page I posted. The term "collusion" doesn't refer to a specific federal crime. Collusive acts, or "acts of collusion," does. Collusion by itself is not specific enough to be a criminal charge. Indeed, the article says "Even though collusion is not a legal term of art, quite a few offenses are characterized by collusive acts." Heck, by your own words, collusion is a crime under specific circumstances, such as in a case of conspiracy. You're a failure.
1
@sirmikalus9923 Why does my opinion not count just because I don't kiss Trump's ass like you do? Believe me, I've spent enough time talking to Styx subscribers to know they all repeat the exact same talking points to make an educated guess.
1
@zigzag1630 Oh, and how could I forget? Volume 1 of the Mueller report concludes that a prosecutable conspiracy case cannot be built because 1) the laws surrounding this conduct are vague and inadequate, and 2) Mueller's investigation was "materially damaged" by witnesses like Manafort lying to the investigators and people like Erik Prince failing to produce critical communications records that Mueller knew existed from metadata and intelligence information. Your move, creep.
1
@jamesdunn9609 Mueller was investigating conspiracy, which requires "two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests." That's a specific charge, unlike collusion which is defined more broadly as, in your words, any links or coordination. Indeed, the Mueller report clearly states: "In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of 'collusion.' In so doing, the Office recognized that the word 'collud[e]' was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation's scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office's focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law. In connection with that analysis, we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign 'coordinat[ed]' - a term that appears in the appointment order - with Russian election interference activities." Try again.
1
@sirmikalus9923 You think I only dislike Trump because it's trendy? Wrong, you fucking moron! I remember at the start of the decade when he was a fucking idiot lying about Obama's birth certificate and he hasn't become any less of a fucking piece of shit. As for Styx, he pushes anti-liberal propaganda every day and you believe every word of it, even when it's misleading at best. "AOC blocked The Daily Caller on Twitter? Oh, never mind the fact that Trump blocked so many people on Twitter that a federal judge had to make him unblock them, or the fact that Styx blocked me on Twitter for daring to ask what sources he used to conclude that the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter was a communist Never Trumper (despite there being no evidence of him being a communist and he only disliked Trump because he thought Trump didn't hate Jews enough). Let's laugh at the liberal!" I don't need to assume everyone I don't like is a Trump supporter. I don't assume someone is a Trump supporter for making me miss a red light. I do, however, assume someone is a Trump supporter when they talk exactly like he does, just like what you're doing. You may not claim to be a Trump supporter, but if someone showed me your comment with your username blanked out and told me it was Trump himself who wrote it, I would believe them. You clearly aren't paying attention, but while your head is shoved far up Trump's ass, maybe you'll notice he doesn't have a spine and that's why he needs people like you to fondle his junk for him. That's the only thing you're good for, after all. Kindly fuck off, you fucking failure.
1
@jamesdunn9609 You won't let anything I say count anyway. I could write eight books' worth of content addressing exactly what you said. You would still move the goalposts for some arbitrary reason and then keep calling me a leftist shill like the Trump NPC you are. You talk exactly like every other Styx subscriber; you don't stand out. Especially since you aren't presenting any arguments other than "You're an idiot" and expecting that to be enough because you're a lazy prick who's only good for massaging Trump's junk. You're a terminal sufferer of Dunning-Kruger disease, you're a failure, and you will never be anything more.
1
@zigzag1630 I would tell you to read this very carefully, but clearly that's asking you way too much. Get your nanny to read it for you, you fucking parasite. https://www.justsecurity.org/63708/word-searchable-version-of-mueller-report/
1
@jamesdunn9609 I knew you were insecure, but I didn't think you were THAT insecure. Triggered much?
1
@jamesdunn9609 That wasn't what I was getting at. You felt the need to tell me your entire life story because you're so insecure that you need to impress upon me how much more accomplished you think you are than me. Thank you for your service, but I'd rather not debate with 12 year olds. Like you, they're too simplistic and too easily destroyed to have much relevance to adults. And also like you, they never admit when they're full of shit.
1
@zigzag1630 So you choose to continue mocking me like the NPC you are instead of overlooking the fact that Russia interfered in a federal election and Trump did nothing to prevent them from doing it again? You really are only good for kissing Trump's ass. Also, the word "collusion" doesn't appear anywhere in that text you just quoted, you said nothing about the obstruction of justice charge for which Mueller hasn't exonerated Trump, you're an insecure douchebag who resorts to trolling to feel something resembling a sense of accomplishment in your otherwise massive disappointment of a life, and you're still a lazy, unfunny asshole who kisses Trump's ass too much to be taken seriously. I checked your profile. You have no videos, no subscribers, no links to other websites. For all intents and purposes, you serve the same function as a Russian bot, and that is all you will ever be: a fake who's good for nothing but sucking Trump's dick. Fuck the incompetent idiots who raised you, fuck everyone who lied and said you would grow up to be special, and fuck you.
1
@jamesdunn9609 I can contend. You just keep finding trivial bullshit to mock me over. Fuck off.
1
@zigzag1630 If I say yes, will you fuck off?
1
@Astares9 No, I just changed the username and avatar. Still the same profile. What's it matter to you anyway, you insecure prick?
1
Literally no one is saying that.
1
@ElVaquero19 That's some blatant mischaracterization you've got there, liar.
1
@ElVaquero19 I can't find the passage that says "We're going to sacrifice a goat to the economy gods and ask for them to cause a recession that will get Trump out of office." Probably because unlike you, I actually read the fucking article.
1
jay private You know how tariffs work, right? China doesn't pay for tariffs on their exports. We do. Basically, we're punishing China by giving them more money. That isn't how you punish a currency manipulator. It's how you get them to laugh at you.
1
@iambob6590 You could've just said "No, I don't think they're a good idea." The fact that you didn't proves my point.
1
@iambob6590 I do, actually. You have no self-awareness. I distinctly remember your side wishing for Obama to be a failed one-term president before he even said "I do solemnly swear." I'm really sick of the right pretending they have the moral high ground when I can point to several reasons for why that isn't the case.
1
Mazxj Stripes I'm sorry, sir, but you're suffering a terminal case of Dunning-Kruger disease. Also, never tell me you're pro-life if you're so lacking in any actual arguments that you resort to telling me to kill myself. You're a failure.
1
@sirmikalus9923 I thought the media was fake news. Did you change your mind or are you just eager to latch onto any media that validates your confirmation bias?
1
@sirmikalus9923 I have found zero news coverage of the tariffs using that perspective. Even Fox News didn't do that and that's the only cable network Trump trusts. Try again, moron. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/norquist-trump-trade-agenda-tariffs-damaging
1
@sarahhaugh7922 There's no evidence for anything you just said.
1
@stephenthompson4863 Another trade partner? You mean like our biggest trading partner, Mexico? Good luck with that.
1
@hellojapan5778 You first.
1