General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Triple 9
Styxhexenhammer666
comments

Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "Pelosi Fearmongers, Says Trump may Contest Election Results" video.

@richardgray8593 No, it's because there is such a thing as faking a photo ID.
3
@Onibushou Those were absentee ballots, not registration forms. https://www.wabe.org/error-on-ballot-form-sent-by-abrams-campaign-sparks-questions-and-response/
3
@bclark28100 No, I mean Brian "overseeing his own election" Kemp
3
@Rose Quartz Judicial Watch is to journalism what you are to Mensa. Oh wait, I forgot you only accept fake news when it suits your agenda. Carry on, dipshit.
2
Former Content Creator Right back atcha, you spineless dipshit.
2
@Former Content Creator What's the matter? I thought you liked walls.
2
@Former Content Creator 1. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/307536-obama-urged-clinton-to-concede-on-election-night 2. I searched "georgia democrats voter fraud" as thoroughly as I could. I can't find any reliable sources to back up claims of voter fraud on the Democrats' part. I did, however, find that over 1.4 million voter registrations had been cancelled since 2012. Some of those were from voters who died or moved, but others were cancelled solely for failing to vote in several election cycles. Also, Georgia is one of four states in the US that continues to use voting machines with no ability to provide voters a paper record so that they can verify the machine counted their vote correctly. Anything beyond that, I can't verify. One guy told me he heard that Stacey Abrams didn't pay her campaign staff. When I asked him to cite his sources, he said "You know? I can't seem to find it. Maybe I was thinking of someone else." So unless you have some rock solid proof of Democratic voter fraud from a reliable source, why should I believe anything else you claim?
2
@richardgray8593 That's not even remotely where I was going with that. If you want to stop noncitizens from voting, you should make sure you aren't inadvertently preventing actual citizens from voting (you know, the thing that's their right as U.S. citizens).
2
@crhuskey You're a blister on the concept of human decency. Fuck off.
2
@MightyTesticleez So it's okay for the alt-right to accuse Democrats of being anti-white, but I'm stupid for trying to connect the two? http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/with-thomas-perez-as-dnc-chairthing-democrats-go-full-anti-white/
2
Bruno Darkhorse 1. Oh, is Washington Post not fake news? Or is it only "real" when it makes the Democrats look bad? 2. Why should I do what you tell me when you give me no reason to respect your opinion on anything? 3. If I took your statement and replaced the word "Democrats" with "white people," would you not accuse me of prejudice? Don't answer that question. You would. 4. Did you forget how the media was so sure Hillary would win the 2016 election? If so, here's a newsflash: you're no better than them.
2
@Stevarooni Roy Moore? No, he didn't accuse Doug Jones of that from what I could find. But he did file a lawsuit to block the results.
2
@richardgray8593 So Democrats win the House of Representatives and you think there's foul play involved, but Brian Kemp wins the election that he oversaw as Secretary of State and you think there's nothing to see here? Give me one good reason why I shouldn't think of you as a massive hypocrite. Actually, you know what? Don't. You'll just ignore me in favor of repeating the same phrases that everyone else in the comments section uses like the totally-not-NPCs you are.
2
Roy Moore refused to concede his Senate loss. What party was he again?
2
They can't. Trump already did that in two of his marriages.
1
@ootmaster1 (facepalm) Seriously? Okay, fine, you clearly need this spelled out for you. Does voter fraud happen? Yes. But statistically speaking, it's virtually nonexistent. And if it wasn't, the White House has done a terrible job of proving it. Sean Spicer once said ""I think there's been studies. There's one that came out of Pew in 2008 that showed 14 percent of people who voted were noncitizens. There's other studies that have been presented to him. It's a belief he maintains." There is no study that shows 14 percent of the votes cast in 2008 were cast by noncitizens. That would've added up to over 18 million fraudulent votes, which is implausible because the total noncitizen population in the 2010 census was about 22.5 million. As for the study that "came out of Pew in 2008," it actually came out in 2012, and it’s about outdated voter rolls -- not fraudulent votes. The study found that about 24 million, or one in every eight, voter registrations in the United States are inaccurate or no longer valid, but it did not find evidence of actual voter fraud. The study was about record-keeping that is badly managed and in disarray. Meanwhile, the study that showed "14 percent of people who voted were noncitizens" was widely criticized for its methodology. Furthermore, one investigative team found 56 cases of noncitizens voting between 2000 and 2011. So yes, it happens, but it's so rare that you have a better chance of winning the lottery twice than spotting voter fraud.
1
@too_short_cortetm8507 What ISN'T fake news to you? Is "fake news" just every outlet Trump doesn't like? But then that leaves Fox News, Breitbart, Info Wars, and Project Veritas. And if they're not even worse about "fake news," that says more about your standards than mine.
1
@ootmaster1 Thank you for proving my point, you malignant hemorrhoid. Literally everything is "fake news" to you except discredited conspiracy theorists.
1
@too_short_cortetm8507 Is this the only strategy Styx's subscribers have? Accusing people you disagree with of being mentally challenged, brainwashed, and averse to facts? That's somewhat hilarious coming a guy whose favorite president thinks windmills cause cancer.
1
Which party is Brian Kemp in again?
1
@samueljonathan6101 We already have voter registration. And there's no evidence of non-citizens being registered to vote en masse. Even then, how are you so cocky as to assume there are no native born citizens who are legally registered Democratic voters?
1
@samueljonathan6101 Yes, we have voter registration. In fact, 20 states and Washington DC have same day voter registration. As for urban versus rural voters, I'm not sure if any voter regardless of where they live would willingly vote for anything if they knew it would lead to more homelessness and more jobs being outsources. Also, since you used Washington as a specific example, according to Gallup, the state has been getting more liberal overall in recent years. Most of the state's residents identify as moderate, but there were more people who identified as liberal than conservative. You can say certain parts of America are getting more conservative, but that can go the other way just as easily. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/data/liberals-outnumber-conservatives-for-first-time-in-washington-state-gallup-poll-shows/
1
@samueljonathan6101 Are you referring to places like San Francisco where immigrants who are of legal voting age and are the parent, guardian or caregiver for a child under the age of 19 can vote in school board elections, but aren't permitted to vote in any other elections?
1
@ootmaster1 Do I sound like I think it doesn't happen? How many times do I have to insist this before it sticks? I am not denying it never happens. I am denying that it happens as rampantly as you claim.
1
Gavigg75 You spelled "chess" wrong. And you're giving Trump way too much credit. If he's playing 4-D "chest," I'm not convinced any good moves he made were on purpose. He might claim to, but only in the sense that he bumped into the table, knocked the pieces over, and said "I meant to do that."
1
@ootmaster1 Is that all you can say? "You're moving the goalposts"? How am I the NPC in this exchange?
1
@konkeydong4478 Repeat yourself much?
1
@boofert.washington2499 The Hill, for starters.
1
@crhuskey You must have me confused with Trump.
1
@ootmaster1 You're deluded if you think you can claim to see right through me while your head is firmly planted up your own ass. And what the fuck did Saul Alinsky do to you? You're demonizing someone most people wouldn't know about if not for you, which says more about you than it does Alinsky.
1
Impervious Is that what this is about? We can't let immigrants into this country because a few of them might commit murder? Tell me, was the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter an immigrant? No, he wasn't. Does that mean that, by the same logic, we shouldn't let white men vote? Of course it fucking doesn't. So even if we agree that undocumented immigrants are breaking the law just by the mere act of being here, that's not the same thing as being violent criminals.
1
@OriginalBongoliath Are you listening to me? Is that even remotely what I said? You're even worse about picking and choosing than I am. My point was that the mere act of being here illegally is not the same as rape and murder. They're both against the law, but being an undocumented immigrant is not a violent crime. As for the rest of your comment, Mexico won't want you either. Go fuck yourself.
1
@Aaron Armstrong It's a violent crime to immigrate without going through the proper paperwork? Even if you didn't kill anyone to get there? If you walk onto someone's lawn without their permission, you're doing something you shouldn't be doing, but that is not a violent crime. I fail to see how the mere act of being here illegally is an inherently violent act. It's unlawful, but not violent.
1
@ootmaster1 Why should I feel intimidated by you when you can't even spell slurs correctly?
1
@lorenzomagazzeni5425 There's no evidence undocumented immigrants have an outsized influence on U.S. elections.
1
@ootmaster1 They're illegal because they don't have the appropriate documents, therefore "undocumented." And can we not call them "invaders"? "Invasion" by definition requires the use of force, and that's not what's happening with most border crossings. They should ideally be crossing legally, I will agree, but these aren't Spanish conquistadors trying to convert the entire population to their way of life or the aliens from Independence Day blowing up landmarks. If it ever gets to that point, I will reconsider. For now, they're crossing the border illegally, but that is not inherently a violent crime.
1
@ootmaster1 I went to school with a few Hispanic students. I had a Spanish professor in college who was born in Spain. My dad lived in a city with a moderately sized Hispanic community for most of this decade. I bring that up because when you say Spanish speakers don't assimilate, I'm left to wonder if you've actually met one of them. Or if you know that the United States doesn't have an official language. What, are you going to bitch about the epidemic of Japanese invaders every time you go out for sushi? I don't want to be so cocky as to jump to conclusions like you do and say you're more delusional than I am. I can understand if you have a differing view on immigration, but if the option of pressing 2 for Spanish on a phone call, DON'T FUCKING PRESS IT!! How much tin foil do you choke on daily that you think this is the worst thing about illegal immigration?
1
@ootmaster1 I ignored what you said because it was stupid. First of all, if you stayed in that history class you flunked, you'd know Germans were the Central Americans of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. By which I mean, so many of them were immigrating that their language was one of the most commonly spoken in the country. Until World War I, we had so many Germans coming here that there were newspapers printed in German. But who am I to let facts get in the way of your complete lack of historical context? Why are there so many Spanish people here? I dunno, maybe you could learn their language and fucking ask them yourself if you're so damn curious.
1
Styx: Only Democrats contest election results. Also Styx: The Democrats stole the midterm elections! I have no evidence, but they did!
1
Trump: "I would've won the popular vote if not for all the people who voted illegally. No, I don't have any proof of that, you just have to trust me on this."
1
@ootmaster1 Are logical fallacies only okay when you do them? I'm not saying that never happens; I'm saying you make it sound like it's more rampant than it really is. Are you referring to San Francisco, where any immigrant who is of legal voting age and is the parent, guardian or caregiver for a child under the age of 19 can vote in school board elections, but not in any other elections? If so, wow, do you suck at research.
1
@ootmaster1 I keep asking this question, but I never get an answer, presumably because you don't have one. But do you want me to think you're right or do you want me to think you're a douche bag?
1
@ootmaster1 Just read your linked article. 1. The secretary of state’s advisory stated that the flagged records should all be considered “weak” matches. In a practical sense, this means counties may not automatically revoke the flagged voter registrations without first mailing notice to those registrants requesting “information relevant to determining the voter’s eligibility for registration” and warning them that “the voter’s registration is subject to cancellation if the registrar does not receive an appropriate reply on or before the 30th day after the date the notice is mailed.” 2. The announcement referenced voting records spanning a 22-year period (1996 to 2018). 3. Persons who were non-citizens at the time they obtained driver’s licenses or ID cards may have since become naturalized citizens, but they are not required to go back to the Department of Public Safety and change their status, making their voter registration records subject to being inaccurately flagged for review. 4. In February, U.S. District Judge Fred Biery of San Antonio blocked the removal of any voters and, according to his ruling, only 80 of the original 98,000 names on the list had been identified as ineligible to vote. Later, the Texas secretary of state agreed to rescind the advisory from January 2019. Your move, hot stuff.
1
@gordon trimble Easy for you to say when your side controlled every branch of government for two years. Imagine if we used that line of thinking in other contexts. "Your side lost, get over it, and you will lose in Lexington and Concord again. How can your side win when your platform is British bad."
1
@ootmaster1 Are you listening to me? At no point have I denied there have never been immigrants voting in our elections. I'm saying you are making it seem like a bigger problem than it really is. Regarding your newly linked article, it is true that estimates of voter rolls in the counties of some states, including California, tally more registered voters than eligible adults. However, did you happen to notice that your article compiled information from 462 counties in 38 states, yet the entire U.S. comprises over 3,000 counties? Those estimates in the article don't encompass the entire U.S., they're based on questionable methodologies, and they include voters who are simply listed on state rolls as "inactive."
1
Rafael Mauricio I didn't need the reminder.
1
@ootmaster1 Hey, you didn't answer my question from earlier. Do you want me to think you're right or do you want me to think you're a douche bag?
1
@ootmaster1 How about you stop repeating yourself like an NPC?
1
@gordon trimble Just out of curiosity, do you still give the Democrats grief for slavery? If so, congratulations. You're being a hypocrite.
1
@ootmaster1 So it's only okay when you do it?
1
@Former Content Creator I don't know about that, but the reverse is definitely true. Trump is just as guilty of "fake news," if not more so, as anyone on cable or in print. And yet he frequently retweets and supports unproven conspiracy theories.
1
@Former Content Creator Are you being obtuse on purpose? Did I ever say that no liberal was ever guilty of hypocrisy? No, I fucking didn't. What I'm trying to communicate is that you will find countless examples in both parties, but only one gets the majority of the mockery on this channel.
1
@ootmaster1 If I'm moving the goalposts, it's to put them back after you moved them.
1
@ootmaster1 Does "im only repeating myself because you keep repeating yourself" ring a bell?
1
You misspelled "Southerners"
1
@RudeJudy Barely anything qualifies as a reputable source to anyone in this comments section. I'm not just talking about CNN or The New York Times. If you look at all the websites I referenced, at least one person here will have dismissed it as "fake news." Can't win here, can I?
1
@RudeJudy 1. "'Missing' ballots being mysteriously found for weeks after the election?" Those were absentee ballots. 2. "Overwhelmingly in favor of democrats?" Cite your source or fuck off. https://www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2018/10/17/republicans-mailing-in-more-ballots-than-democrats-lee-county-is-no-1/ 3. "People bragging about voting multiple times?" Cite your source or fuck off. 4. "People who moved to florida from nyc finding out ppl are using their names to vote in nyc.?" Cite your source or fuck off. 5. "Voting machines changing republican votes to democrat?" That happened in reverse too. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/texas/article/Voting-machine-errors-changed-some-Texans-13339298.php 6. "People being turned away at polls being told they were suddenly and without notice voting in the wrong districts?" Prove that no Republican did that or fuck off. 7. "Hundreds of thousands of votes by NON CITIZENS?" One study found 56 cases of noncitizens voting across all elections from 2000 to 2011. In 2016, there were 19 noncitizens who voted illegally in North Carolina. When Texas officials said they found 95,000 noncitizens on voter rolls in 2018, they immediately started walking that claim back as they didn't make it clear how they compiled that list or how many people on said list were naturalized citizens who had recently registered to vote. 8. "People running as republican and as soon as they won changed their party to democrat?" Cite your source or fuck off.
1
@RudeJudy The midterms proved nothing. I've done more research into midterm voter fraud than every school project combined and any evidence of it on the Democrats' part has been debatable at best.
1
Gavigg75 Remember when Trump promised to prosecute and imprison Hillary? His party controlled every branch of government for two years and he couldn't even make that happen. There should be no trouble building a strong criminal case against "Crooked Hillary" and yet . . . nothing. Now, tell me who the real failure is.
1
ootmaster1 “News reports that 38 percent did not have a favorite justice or were unsure. An additional 22 percent could not name a Supreme Court justice.” Wow, you must really suck at reading when you confuse indecisiveness with not knowing a single name.
1
tharrison004 So you're admitting Fox News lied? https://thehill.com/legal/427849-fox-news-poll-ginsburg-is-americans-favorite-supreme-court-justice
1
Night Garden You're confusing the Democratic party with Saturday morning cartoon villains. Also, lying to Congress is a felony. Like when Trump's former head of the EPA Scott Pruitt stated in testimony that he had never used a private email account to conduct business while he was Oklahoma’s attorney general. Or when Trump's Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said during her confirmation hearings that she has not been involved in her family’s foundation (she was vice president of the foundation's board for 17 years). Or when Trump's Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said in written testimony that his former bank never used “robo-signing” to improperly foreclose on homeowners. Or when Trump's former Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price said the discount he got on a biotech stock was “available to every single individual that was an investor at the time" (fewer than 20 investors in the U.S. were offered that discount). But sure, we should only be worried about the Democrats being held accountable and not engaging in selective outrage like a bunch of snowflake NPCs.
1
Impervious Bill was only accused of doing all of that? So accusations are enough to make Bill Clinton a rapist, but not Brett Kavanaugh? But I digress. Did I, at any point, say that anything Bill Clinton was proven to have done is excusable? No. I did not. So please don't be so quick to call me a hypocrite if you can't prove that. What Bill did was wrong, but that does not absolve Trump of anything.
1
Impervious 1. I didn't say Bill Clinton didn't cheat on his wife, nor am I so willfully ignorant as to believe he didn't. 2. Isn't that invalidating your first point? "Bill Clinton cheated, but infidelity has nothing to do with this discussion." 3. I don't watch The Young Turks, but clearly you know my subscriptions better than I do, so what's the point of denying it?
1
@ootmaster1 I don't watch South Park. You would know better than I do.
1
@boofert.washington2499 Please show me how it's done, O Comedy God. Oh wait, I just remembered. I have no reason to take your opinion seriously.
1
@Biff Dingus Who the hell made you a comedy expert? Rob Schneider?
1
@jenderr6532 Piss off. You'll still say it's lame because you don't want to admit when liberals are being funny.
1
Anonymous WhiteGuy You're as guilty of confirmation bias as any liberal. That's why I resort to insults, because 99% of facts I present either get ignored or dismissed without even a shred of credible counter-evidence having ever been presented.
1
Anonymous WhiteGuy You don't give a shit about facts. If you did, you wouldn't be watching Styx.
1
Anonymous WhiteGuy Are you talking about Broward County. Because Rick Scott asked state law enforcement to investigate Broward County election officials for potential “rampant [voter] fraud." Monitors from his own administration say they found none. Try harder.
1
Anonymous WhiteGuy In Trump's first ten months of office, he lied six times more than Obama did in his entire presidency. Don't delude yourself on which side has the facts.
1
@ootmaster1 So Mueller can investigate Trump and say he can't find enough proof to establish a conspiracy between the administration and Russia and you think that's all the exculpatory evidence you need, but Rick Scott - a Republican governor who would have so much to gain from proving the Democrats committed voter fraud in his state - can't find anything and you just dismiss it? Piss off.
1
@tigertough5164 ...you somehow managing to be even less funny with "shitlips." Anyone who kisses Trump's ass as hard as a Styx subscriber doesn't get to throw stones.
1