Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "HAHA How About That Impeachment? Oh Wait, Nobody Cares" video.

@modus_operandi2508 Calling someone an idiot for not agreeing with you without making even the slightest attempt to adequately explain where the lie was is not how you prove you have the facts on your side. And I already know you will continue to fail to adequately explain that.
2
Have you read literally any of his tweets? Including the ones in all caps?
1
@californicationendlesssumm2811 That wasn't my question. And you're wrong. A. His tweets are for his supporters. I know because I've seen the replies to his tweets and his supporters repeat the same verbal rimming every time no matter what's in the tweet. B. He's not repairing the country. If he were repairing the country and so confident in the success of his efforts, why would he want to distract anyone away from that? This is the most attention hungry individual on the planet, and you're telling me he doesn't want people to notice when he does something supposedly good? Bullshit. C. The stock market is not the economy, and it sure as hell isn't an indication of job growth. In December 2018, job growth was good, but stocks were down. So when Trump gloats about the stock market, it's bullshit. Especially since it performed better under Obama: https://www.macrotrends.net/2481/stock-market-performance-by-president D. There is no "shiny new wall." The article Styx linked to in the other video he released this morning said 100 miles of the 450 promised by the end of this year had been "built." What he neglects to mention, however, is that most of what has been "built" was replacing existing barriers, and oh yeah, it took Trump three years to reach less than a quarter of his stated goal. And the wall would be so ridiculously easy to climb that it's almost sad: https://rockandice.com/climbing-news/impossible-to-climb-no-more-a-recap-of-the-border-wall-climbing-competition/ E. Obama was president when bin Laden was killed, but I'll give Trump as much credit now as he gave Obama then: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/252874018955354114 F. He didn't "expose" the left. He's a corrupt lying con man who committed every type of fraud in the books. He gets no credit for "exposing" the left when all he does is accuse them of doing the very things he himself has actually done. G. "He has done more in 3 years than all other presidents combined" Washington was a war hero. Lincoln ended the Civil War. FDR brought us out of the Great Depression. What has Trump done? Take credit for other people's successes. And yet that's apparently enough to get you to kiss his ass because your standards are that lacking.
1
@robertmatthews2009 Illegal immigrant apprehensions had already been going down since the Bush administration. The stock market isn't the economy. Trump isn't a troll because doing that would require intelligence he doesn't possess and no record of unethical behavior that can't be easily thrown right back at him. The majority of his campaign contributions come from PACs, not individual donations or even his own pocket as he claimed. And yet none o that will ever be enough to keep you from continuing to kiss his ass.
1
@robertmatthews2009 None of what? All the ways I disproved the positive achievements you listed?
1
Robert Matthews Have you learned nothing from 2016? You know, when everyone was so confident Hillary would win?
1
GORDO EINSTEIN Are you seriously trying to gaslight me? I made claims and cited sources - or what you call “evidence” - and yet despite that being all Styx and his subscribers can talk about, doing that still isn’t good enough for you?
1
Rose Quartz If you’re so sure the facts are on your side, then you wouldn’t need to resort to playground bullying without making even the slightest attempt at conducting research. Would you, dipshit? You never had the facts and you never will.
1
GORDO EINSTEIN Wrong. I understood you perfectly. It’s just that you’re full of shit.
1
@gordoeinstein I already explained what I meant when I said the stock market is not representative of the economy. It is not tied to job growth, and it's not my fault you can't or won't accept that. You're an idiot.
1
Evil often disguises itself in a cloak of virtue So baseless assumptions and playground bullying are only okay when you do it? If it wasn’t for double standards, you’d have no standards at all, idiot.
1
@violenceislife1987 1. Your medical degree from Trump University was a scam. Get a real one and shut up about TDS. 2. The woman isn't entirely wrong since he said himself it wouldn't be a concrete wall: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1075197395892404231 3. "engineers suggested to President Trump that the iron slats would be better and He agreed" Don't capitalize "he" like you're calling Trump God. That makes you sound like a cultist. Anyway, you're full of shit. He said in a 2015 rally that the wall would be partially built out of steel, but in later instances, he said the wall would be made out of concrete with no mention of any steel being involved in the construction. But in other instances, when he talked about including slats, they were made out of steel, not iron. Try again, idiot.
1
@californicationendlesssumm2811 If I do, will you stop being full of shit?
1
nexus169 Could you please specify exactly which comment it is you’re wrong about?
1
nexus169 https://www.gobankingrates.com/investing/stock-market-vs-jobs-report I know you’re always busy maintaining your Trump stalker shrine and kissing his ass, but I’m sure you’re capable of fitting in the time to read one article. Or is that still asking too much of you? You’re an idiot.
1
@BOG0690 Bullshit. He never worked a day in his life. Even as president, the vast majority of his time is spent either golfing or tweeting.
1
@gordoeinstein It is a tragically stupid and simplistic thing to try and oversimplify the Great Depression by saying the stock market crash was its singular cause. A healthy economy can recover from a stock market crash, but not from nine thousand banks failing in the span of a few months. Then again, viewing it that way seems like the kind of willfully dumb thing you would do.
1
@UCwNYORoyDWOo3aZCDUNC_Rg Bullshit. You did say that. Why else would you bring up an infamous stock market crash? You're a liar and a failure.
1
@gordoeinstein Yes, you did. And you repeating that over and over again like an NPC without making the slightest effort to back yourself up with any research whatsoever doesn't make you less of a piece of shit. You're a liar and a failure.
1
@RyanM-ke2gu 1. "You think our country's so innocent?" Or does that not count somehow? 2. I already explained my statement about the stock market and cited evidence. It's not my fault you're being willfully stupid about it. 3. Okay, now you're definitely using straw man arguments. You're a liar and a failure.
1
@totallyjonesin This one? https://www.macrotrends.net/2481/stock-market-performance-by-president Seems to work just fine to me.
1
@DyeJoeBlue Wrong! https://www.macrotrends.net/2481/stock-market-performance-by-president
1
@RyanM-ke2gu "Trump is great for America" This is your lie. You are a failure.
1
@RyanM-ke2gu 1. The troops would say you're full of shit. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/01/3000-additional-troops-heading-middle-east-officials-200103175502486.html 2. The manufacturing sector would say you're full of shit. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/trump-trade-war-loss-of-manufacturing-jobs-contradicts-purpose-tariffs-2019-10-1028577666 3. African Americans would say you're full of shit. https://www.epi.org/publication/valerie-figures-state-unemployment-by-race/ 4. SNAP participation was falling before Trump's election, but not solely because of the economy. A 1996 welfare law included a provision that prohibited people ages 18 to 49 without minor children or disabilities from receiving more than three months of SNAP benefits in every three year period unless they work at least 20 hours per week, are employed or enrolled in a work plan. By 2016, all but one state had sought to waive work requirements under this provision, causing hundreds of thousands of adults to lose SNAP as a result. TLDR everyone on public assistance would say you're full of shit. You're a liar and a failure.
1
@too_short_cortetm8507 The economy was already doing well when he was elected. All you're doing is kissing his ass for someone else's successes. And I already explained why all the evidence of him being good for the country is 100% bullshit. It's not my fault you didn't read that.
1
@RyanM-ke2gu 1. Tell that to the transgender troops Trump banned for no good reason. As for the rest of the troops, Trump is taking money from the military to pay for the border wall. 2. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in Trump's first 29 months, the economy created an average of about 194,000 jobs per month. In Obama's last 29 months of office, that average was 221,000 jobs per month. 3. According to the Labor Department, black unemployment was as low as 4.5% in 1953. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED075581.pdf#page=149 According to the latest data from BLS, the black unemployment rate was 5.5%. Try again, failure.
1
I can only think of one mass shooter who identified as a liberal, and even then the police said the shooter had no political motive. The rest either had non-political motives or self-identified as far-right.
1
@RyanM-ke2gu 1. Multiple countries already have transgender troops serving with no issues. Strike one. 2. "Nice stats from the days of segregation, try to find data relevant to today next time." Careful, you might tear a muscle if you pull excuses out of your ass that hard. My point was that black unemployment currently being at an all time low is a lie. Strike two. 3. "we were discussing manufacturing jobs, but you can't seem to refute any statements w anything actually relative, just stuff that sounds close to stuff your straw man with" I already did. You're just being a shitty listener. Manufacturing employment increased by 471,000 in 28 months in office. In the same amount of time during Obama's presidency, manufacturing added 525,000 jobs. Strike three. You're a liar and a failure.
1
You have zero evidence to prove that most mass shooters identify as socialists.
1
@Alex Beyer Amazing. Every word of what you just said was wrong. First of all, did I say "alt-right" or "far-right"? No, I didn't. But more importantly, I know for a fact you have zero evidence because you haven't presented any. All you've given me is bullshit. What last three shootings do you mean? The two in Florida and the one in Jersey City? If so, let's put them next to the dates of the last three Democrat debates: Debate: October 15 Debate: November 20 Miramar shooting: December 5 Pensacola shooting: December 6 Jersey City shooting: December 10 Debate: December 19 If the DNC were trying to boost ratings, why not "schedule" the shootings closer to the actual debates? The media is unlikely to still be covering a mass shooting over a week later given how quickly the headlines change, so if that were the DNC's strategy, it would be a bad one. That's precisely why it isn't their strategy because your claim is bullshit. Strike one. There was no "CA garlic" shooting. The only shooting I could find committed by a confirmed Bernie supporter was in 2017 when Steve Scalise was shot. The El Paso shooter, however, was not a registered Democrat, much less a socialist. I know because a Twitter account with the suspect's name liked tweets featuring a #BuildtheWall hashtag and a photo of guns that spelled out "Trump." And the suspect's manifesto is so anti-immigration that there is no conceivable way he would've been a socialist. Also, I looked up "New Mexico shooter Elizabeth Warren supporter." There was nothing. Nada. Zip. Zilch. As for the Pulse nightclub shooter, do you genuinely believe that having unclear motives makes a shooter a socialist? The good news is you got one kind of right. The bad news is that you said “most” shooters are socialists, so you're still full of shit. Strike two. "What about the one after the Russia hoax bombed and Mullet proved no collusion" Wow, you're stupid. Trump was not exonerated on obstruction of justice, a foreign government interfered in an election to help him win, and the special counsel's name was not "Mullet," you fucking idiot. And again, which shooting are you talking about? Whichever it was, you still have zero evidence tying it to the DNC. Strike three. You have nothing. You won nothing. You are nothing. Fuck you.
1
1. When Matthews said "I watch the economy boom," I made the educated guess that he was referring to the stock market since Trump tweets about the stock market constantly. 2. February 1, 2016 - Trump says at a rally in Iowa that he was self-funding his own campaign. 3. Trump is not the "biggest troll in history" because no troll should want it to be so easy to prove them wrong. There are entire websites dedicated to listing Trump's lies, broken campaign promises, and contradictions. If he were an effective troll, none of those examples would be so easy to find. You're a liar and a failure.
1
Trump has not positively affected both. I know this because the stock market and job growth are worse under him than they were under Obama: https://fortune.com/2019/11/01/trump-obama-markets-comparison-s-and-p-500-dow-nasdaq-economy/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2019/09/20/trump-has-created-15-million-fewer-jobs-than-obama/
1
Alex Beyer Pfft, like you’re Jimi Fucking Hendrix. What does it say about how little you have to actually say that’s worth a damn that your idea of an insult is pretending my work is much worse than it is? You’re a moron and a failure who doesn’t know what a leftist is, a piece of shit who doesn’t know what an unbiased source is. If you knew, you’d suggest one, but you won’t because you don’t know any because - once again - you’re a moron and a failure. Fuck you.
1
An opinion piece by one guy on a website that clarifies the opinion is his alone =/= "No one cares" Trump cares, or else he wouldn't be whining about it on Twitter. Once again, you suck at facts.
1
Why? Because of one opinion article on a site that says the opinion is the author's alone and doesn't reflect the opinions of the whole website?
1
@nexus169 Several things wrong with that . . . or rather, everything wrong with that. A. The Trump family doesn't get to throw stones when it comes to family corruption. B. Multiple Ukrainian officials have stated that neither Joe nor Hunter Biden did anything wrong. Hunter Biden's involvement in Burisma was never the subject of any investigation. The efforts to pressure the Ukrainian government into firing Shokin were joint efforts by the US and multiple allies not because of anything to do with Burisma or Hunter personally, but because Shokin was not doing his job of investigating corruption properly. C. If you actually cared about facts, none of this would need to be explained to you.
1
Randolph Carter That's what you're going to give me instead of anything of actual substance?
1