Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "Michael Flynn Was Just Totally Vindicated Despite the Modern Witch Trials" video.

It's been almost four years. If nothing has happened in that time, nothing ever will.
2
They never will.
2
The judge entered a stay of the proceedings.
1
Translation: "He's a judge I don't like because he doesn't agree with me."
1
Flynn pleaded guilty twice though.
1
The DOJ asked to drop the case of a man who pleaded guilty twice, and even then the judge entered a stay of the proceedings.
1
He doesn't. I know for two reasons. 1. He'd spill them by now if he did. 2. Trump would've acted on it in the 3+ years since he took office.
1
He lied about contacts with Russia's ambassador to the US.
1
@Blackwing02 "Most likely"? Can you prove that?
1
@Kansas Geoff No, unless you have suggestions.
1
@JohnDoe-mv6go Perjury is a crime.
1
Internet god Said Flynn to Kislyak: "What I would ask Russia to do is to not -is - is -if anything - because I know you have to have some sort of action - to, to only make it reciprocal. Make it reciprocal. Don't -don't make it-don't go any further than you have to. Because I don't want us to get into something that has to escalate, on a, you know, on a tit for tat." Flynn later admitted in court that he had falsely told FBI agents in January 2017 that he did not ask Kislyak to refrain from escalating the Obama administration's sanctions against Russia.
1
Angry Shamrock https://www.wklaw.com/lie-to-a-police-officer/
1
@lindab6596 1. The Central Park Five? The men who Trump still insists are guilty decades after they were exonerated? Can't imagine why. 2. "All incoming Presidential teams have contact with Foreign interest" That's not really the issue. I sincerely doubt anyone would make such a huge deal about the Trump Tower meeting if the campaign wasn't switching their story with every answer.
1
Timothy Weinand 1. You have no proof. 2. Insulting people does not equal proving them wrong, but it does show you're nothing but a Styx goon who'd rather stoop to insults than argue anything factual or substantive. I know this because I got my username from another Styx goon who'd rather pretend to be my mom than talk like an adult.
1
Timothy Weinand You have no evidence to provide anything you said because everything you say is a lie or and insult paired with a lie. Typical Styx goon.
1
vicious nchi I didn't lose the fight. With rare exception, no one here can debate me like an adult.
1
He never will
1
Tiber Zeek Is that what I said or are you failing to cover the fact that you have nothing of substance to say?
1
Tiber Zeek "I didn't that that's what you said" And you call me slow. Kavanaugh didn't sue Christine Blasey Ford and Flynn isn't going to avenge shit.
1
Tiber Zeek I used Kavanaugh to back up my claim. I saw numerous Styx subscribers saying he should've sued for libel or that his one failing was that he never died. The fact is, for whatever reason, he never did. Similarly, neither Joe Arpaio nor Dinesh D'Souza avenged naysayers after their pardons. Arpaio lost a Senate race and D'Souza made an objectively terrible movie, neither of which screams "vengeance." Based on precedent, Flynn won't avenge shit.
1
Trump's own administration found that the FBI was not politically motivated in their investigation.
1
@lavainegregory2283 Rejecting reality when it doesn't suit your false narrative? Typical Styx goon.
1
@TinyDancer250 Two lies in one
1
@r.l.royalljr.3905 https://www.lawfareblog.com/flynn-redux-what-those-fbi-documents-really-show
1
@tubewatcher117 The same people who don't exist?
1
He pleaded guilty twice.
1
@ProfessorImbakeXBoomshaka Where did you get that 95% statistic?
1
@ProfessorImbakeXBoomshaka Why did you post your reply twice? In my experience, when a Styx fan tells me to do my own research, what they mean is "I'm either too lazy to do it myself or I'm covering for the fact that I don't actually have any evidence." Please show me where you got that statistic.
1
@poppys3728 You have nothing factual or substantive to argue so you stoop to this? Typical.
1