Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "The First Day of Impeachment Hearings was a Boring Farce" video.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4.  @BWMagus  Your best evidence of Biden doing anything wrong is a Nickelback meme. Multiple Ukrainian officials have stated that neither Joe nor Hunter Biden did anything wrong, which makes sense if you merely examined the timeline of events. Burisma was investigated for money-laundering, which took place before Hunter Biden started working there. And the investigation was dropped two years before the anti-corruption drive in Ukraine backed by the US government, European allies and the International Monetary Fund that Joe Biden joined. It's not like Joe Biden was singlehandedly pressuring Ukraine into doing any of this as you claim. "We also have other things; emails indicating the DNC was directly working with Ukrainian officials...An audio recording of a Ukrainian official admitting they worked for Hillary in the campaign" Show me. And when you do, please explain how it proves Joe Biden tried to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma because of Hunter. "Two Ukrainians convicted for meddling in the 2016 US elections...And the 'loss' of billions of dollars of US aid money." How is that proof Joe Biden tried to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma because of Hunter? "a Politico article from 2017 was actually read into the record of this hearing about how Ukrainian officials were sucking up to Trump precisely because they meddled in our election, it's an acknowledged fact even on the left." Again, how does that prove Joe Biden tried to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma because of Hunter? "So Trump asking for investigations seems completely justified." Trump asking for an investigation of a political rival for something the Ukrainian government said he didn't do is not justified. "You might say none of this is 'proof' and I would say, yes, you're right--but it's plenty of grounds for investigation." I mean...I guess?
    1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7.  @BWMagus  1. If there were things in the phone call he didn't want released for security reasons, maybe he shouldn't keep insisting what he released was the full transcript. Since it wasn't, he's lying. 2. "Maybe he's just an obstinate jackass who doesn't want to cooperate with assholes who launched a two year long investigation based on an obviously false dossier." The investigation was based on what George Stephanopoulos told the Australian official. 3. "there doesn't appear to be criminal wrongdoing here" Wrong! Campaign finance law states "It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a federal, state, or local election.” There is no evidence that Biden took any action to intentionally benefit his son, nor is there any evidence of wrongdoing by Hunter Biden. Ukrainian prosecutors found as much. So what other reason would Trump want Biden investigated unless it was to get dirt on a potential 2020 opponent (a.k.a. a "thing of value")? "Even the Dem's witnesses cannot testify, with certainty, to anything other than what was in that phone call summary" Gee, it's almost like a phone call between two world leaders is supposed to be confidential. "and the Ukrainian government seems to be uniformly stating they were never told of a quid pro quo, right up to President Zelensky. " The same Ukrainian government that uniformly stated neither Joe nor Hunter Biden did anything wrong?
    1
  8. 1
  9. 1