Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "Second Whistleblower Same as the First: Irrelevant" video.

  1.  @violenceislife1987  The transcript that says "not a verbatim transcript" on the first fucking page? Try again.
    4
  2.  @thnksno  No, but I'm flattered you think our moms have the same hobbies.
    4
  3. "Hi, I'm Styxhexenhammer666. The U.S. legal system has a number of circumstances under which hearsay can be admissible in a court of law, but I either don't know that or don't care to acknowledge it because it gets in the way of me making fun of the Democrats. Also, the fact that Trump did the very thing he's getting impeached for on camera gets in the way, so let's ignore that and keep laughing at the Democrats LOL."
    3
  4.  @seanyouknowwho798  First of all, Trump supporters don't get to suddenly pretend they're above anonymous sources. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/232572505238433794 Secondly, the House needs to write articles of impeachment and then have the vote. An inquiry does not require a vote. How is this so difficult to understand?
    2
  5.  @monkeygraborange  Who made you the spokesmonkey for everyone in America?
    2
  6.  @depravedbeast1735  As opposed to Rose Quartz's parents' basement, which is too good for him.
    2
  7. "Hi, I'm Styxhexenhammer666. The U.S. legal system has a number of circumstances under which hearsay can be admissible in a court of law, but I either don't know that or don't care to acknowledge it because it gets in the way of me making fun of the Democrats. Also, the fact that Trump did the very thing he's getting impeached for on camera gets in the way, so let's ignore that and keep laughing at the Democrats LOL."
    1
  8.  MEGA 2020  "Hi, I'm MEGA 2020, and I regurgitate Trump's bullshit so much that I project my mental health and lack of original ideas onto other people." Go fuck yourself.
    1
  9. @Rose Quartz You're projecting your failed existence again. Fuck you.
    1
  10. An inquiry does not require a vote
    1
  11.  Rigard Radaghast  Am I speaking Klingon? A vote is not required for an impeachment inquiry.
    1
  12.  @seanyouknowwho798  Yeah, the articles of impeachment need to be voted on, but not the inquiry. Are you normally this obtuse?
    1
  13.  @bologna3048  I am. What they're saying is bullshit.
    1
  14. @Rose Quartz Literally nothing you just said proves you right about anything, you piece of shit. Fuck you.
    1
  15.  @seanyouknowwho798  1. What proper impeachment process? The Constitution doesn't have one. 2. "As for your reference to Republicans doing the same" When did I say the Republicans do the same? You mean when I linked that Trump tweet you clearly didn't read?
    1
  16.  @silverpotter608  Aren't you on the side that goes on and on and on about what's in the Constitution? If the Constitution doesn't say a vote is required to make an inquiry legit, and it's not in the House rules, then you're a hypocrite.
    1
  17. "Hi, I'm Styxhexenhammer666. The U.S. legal system has a number of circumstances under which hearsay can be admissible in a court of law, but I either don't know that or don't care to acknowledge it because it gets in the way of me making fun of the Democrats. Also, the fact that Trump did the very thing he's getting impeached for on camera gets in the way, so let's ignore that and keep laughing at the Democrats LOL."
    1
  18. You mean the Deep State that doesn't exist?
    1
  19. "Hi, I'm Bern Daz, and I don't know how the law works."
    1
  20. "Hi, I'm Styxhexenhammer666. The U.S. legal system has a number of circumstances under which hearsay can be admissible in a court of law, but I either don't know that or don't care to acknowledge it because it gets in the way of me making fun of the Democrats. Also, the fact that Trump did the very thing he's getting impeached for on camera gets in the way, so let's ignore that and keep laughing at the Democrats LOL."
    1
  21.  @OriginalBongoliath  Said the Dunning-Kruger sufferer.
    1
  22.  @thinkingmachine354  That's not what "ironic" means.
    1
  23.  @bologna3048  Literally everything you just said is bullshit. You know who was the one behind the removal of the Nickelback tweet? Not Joe Biden. You know who asked foreign governments to investigate Joe Biden on camera, doing the very thing he's getting impeached for? Not Joe Biden. Try again.
    1
  24. @Rose Quartz You're projecting your failed existence again. Go fuck yourself.
    1
  25.  @sarahhaugh7922  Who speaks logical statements? No one here can claim to have done that, including you. Go to hell, liar.
    1
  26.  @briancooper7116  Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2): statements by a party opponent. In fact, Federal Rule of Evidence 801 is a section that considers something not hearsay.
    1
  27.  @macorte1972  Trump straight up asked Ukraine and China to investigate a political rival on camera. What the hell are you talking about?
    1
  28.  @scallen3841  Impeaching him is half the process. If they want to remove him from office, that's the Senate's job. And McConnell is an obstructionist douchebag who has already made up his mind before a trial has even been scheduled.
    1
  29.  @macorte1972  1. Biden was the Democratic frontrunner when Trump made the phone call. 2. If you looked at the timeline of events, you'd start to realize Trump's accusation of guilt didn't hold up. Hunter Biden started working at Burisma after the money-laundering had taken place, and Joe Biden joining the U.S. and its allies in pressuring Ukraine to fire the prosecutor took place two years after that. 3. Even if Joe and Hunter Biden were guilty (which Ukrainian prosecutors have said they weren't), nothing about the Burisma case has anything to do with the Mueller investigation. 4. You don't have affidavits. You have a fake president whose best evidence of Hunter Biden's guilt was a misleading photo in a Nickelback meme and a document that says "not a verbatim transcript" on the first fucking page. You have nothing but bullshit, so what the fuck are you talking about?
    1
  30. Trump loves anonymous sources, though. Remember the anonymous source that told him Obama's birth certificate was fake?
    1
  31.  @violenceislife1987  Except it is a fake and you're full of shit. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/expert-no-doubt-obamas-birth-certificate-is-legit
    1
  32.  @violenceislife1987  What, is Fox News too liberal for you?
    1
  33.  @nycholaus  The layers were caused by common, off-the-shelf scanning software. The scanner optical character recognition (OCR) software in question translates characters or words in a photograph into text. The software separates the background and the text and splits element into layers and parts of layers. When the software is unable to separate text fully from background (like when a signature runs over the line of background, or typed characters touch the internal border of the document), it creates a separate layer within the document. Try again.
    1
  34. @Rose Quartz You're projecting your worthless failed existence again. Fuck you.
    1
  35. @Rose Quartz Is Fox too liberal for you? Go fuck yourself.
    1
  36.  @filbertovandette  Go to hell, liar.
    1
  37. We don't. On the first page, it says "not a verbatim transcript." Try again, liar.
    1
  38. "Hi, I'm Nostra Fn Damus. The U.S. legal system has a number of circumstances under which hearsay can be admissible in a court of law, but I either don't know that or don't care to acknowledge it because it gets in the way of me making fun of the Democrats. Also, the fact that Trump did the very thing he's getting impeached for on camera gets in the way, so let's ignore that and keep laughing at the Democrats LOL."
    1
  39.  @NostraFnDamus  In my experience, you're all terrible listeners.
    1
  40.  @OriginalBongoliath  You listen to Styx, so clearly you do.
    1
  41.  @Rareplymouth  Directly refuted by what evidence? The transcript of the phone call that says "not a verbatim transcript" on the first fucking page? The same "transcript" in which Trump asks a foreign leader for a favor? Bullshit. Try again.
    1
  42. @Rose Quartz You're projecting your worthless failure again. Fuck you.
    1