Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "Even Obvious Push Polls Can't Hide Bidens Approval Slump" video.

  1. https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/sidney-powell-tells-judge-no-reasonable-person-would-believe-her-dominion-conspiracy-theories-were-statements-of-fact/
    1
  2.  @wigletron2846  Take it to court, then
    1
  3.  @wigletron2846  Why are you being so aggressive if you’re sure the evidence is on your side? Go to court if you think you can prove it. The GOP spent years filling the courts with conservative judges. You’re telling me there isn’t ONE you could find who would listen? Or are you just going to keep wallowing in your delusions like the worthless loser you are?
    1
  4.  @jamestoney6599  That's not even remotely true. We already had audits and recounts of the 2020 election, none of which found evidence of widespread fraud. Nor was there any such fraud in 2016 or Trump and the Republicans would have conducted an audit while they had control of every branch of government. There. Was. No. Steal.
    1
  5.  @renkol123  I was paying attention. You are just lying. 1. I'm not aware of any lawsuits over election fraud that took place until after it was called for Biden, and when that happened, everyone who publicly claimed the election was stolen and went to court for it ended up saying on the record that they were lying. Sidney Powell said no reasonable person would take her Dominion voting machine claims as statements of fact. Rudy Giuliani said his claim that Republican poll observers were expelled was not true. AG Barr flat out said no fraud took place that would have affected the results. How many times does that need to happen before it gets through to you? 2. How much fraud is acceptable? Ideally, none. But the thing is, the amount of election or voter fraud that actually occurs - that is, the legal definition of it - is statistically zero. Not nonexistent, but so infrequent that it is statistically zero. And it's always detected and fixed. All the election fraud evidence people like you point to proves nothing except that you don't actually know the difference between human error and election fraud, and if you think the system is "borked" even though the fact that it is instead, as I said, always detected and fixed, that's on you. 3. Congratulations, now YOU have your own Russiagate: a conspiracy for which you delude yourself into thinking mountains of evidence exist that actually doesn't. THERE. WAS. NO. STEAL.
    1
  6.  @renkol123  I admitted no such thing, liar. 1. “Reasonable people understand that the ‘language of the political arena, like the language used in labor disputes … is often vituperative, abusive and inexact,'” argued Powell's motion to dismiss a lawsuit against her by Dominion. “It is likewise a ‘well recognized principle that political statements are inherently prone to exaggeration and hyperbole.'” Those are Powell's own words. You lied. 2. There is no "acceptable" amount of fraud, but since making the number of instances of fraud zero is unrealistic, we should be keeping it low enough to not affect the outcome of an election. Also, there is no valid evidence that mail-in ballots are more susceptible to fraud. https://theconversation.com/6-ways-mail-in-ballots-are-protected-from-fraud-145666 3. Questioning 2020 is not an inherently objectionable action. Shady things happen in every election and should be looked into. However, the difference with 2020 is that what is being questioned is whether the election was stolen, an idea based entirely on lies. Do I need to repeat that Attorney General Barr - an extremely loyal member of the Trump administration - came right out and said it wasn't stolen? I don't trust him, but if he was lying about that, then he pissed off his boss and his boss' supporters for seemingly no good reason. I was paying attention. You are a liar. THERE. WAS. NO. STEAL.
    1
  7. That's what I'd been saying about the former guy.
    1