Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "CNN Claims Mueller Probe Has Basically Ended and DOJ Will Soon Get the Report" video.

  1. I know, right? The Trump administration was such a waste
    1
  2. Arcon of Anarchy https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alt-right
    1
  3.  @mechanoid2k  There is so much wrong here, I'm surprised you didn't get it from his tweets. 1. Justice Department policy states that a sitting president can't be indicted. However, he can still be impeached. Just so you don't try to accuse me of not understanding the Constitution, Article 2, Section 4 states that the president "shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." Article 3, Section 3 states that "[t]reason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." Further, Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5 states that The House of Representatives have "the sole Power of Impeachment. " So if the Mueller report reveals in no uncertain terms that Trump and his administration gave "aid and comfort" to Russia, a country whose president just recently threatened to target the United States with nuclear missiles, then the House of Representatives would have grounds for impeachment. 2. According to Rasmussen, his approval rating is currently at 35%. Knowing that, are you so sure he will get re-elected? In the same way you were likely so sure that Roy Moore would get elected? In the same way you were likely so sure that there would be no Blue Wave? In the same way you were so sure Trump wouldn't cave on the border wall? Suppose he doesn't get re-elected. When that happens, I know how you'll react. You'll come up with excuses with no evidence to support them and you'll generally react like a toddler who was told to share his toys.
    1
  4. @mechanoid2k I don't know about the abortion comments or overdramatic girl you're talking about, but as for the rest of your comment... 1. According to the Justice Department, 54% of hate crimes go unreported. I'm sure it's easy for you to make a claim about faked hate crimes when they're the ones that make headlines. 2. It wasn't a liberal who came up with "Crooked Hillary," "Lyin' Ted," or "Little Adam Schitt." 3. If conservatives don't take polls, why does Fox News conduct them all the time? I know for a fact conservatives took the CNN poll on the State of the Union because most viewers tend to be members of the president’s party, meaning conservatives and right leaning independents were behind that 76% approval rating. 4. Trump declaring a national emergency was an empty gesture. All he had to do was explain that the situation at the border was so dire that declaring a national emergency was absolutely necessary. And yet in his own words, "I want to do it faster. I could do the wall over a longer period of time. I didn’t need to do this. But I’d rather do it much faster.”
    1
  5. Justice Department policy is that a sitting president can’t be indicted anyway. But if somehow it were to occur that Trump does get indicted, will you still be so sure of yourself?
    1
  6. ImproveSynthSational Wasn’t Manafort sent to jail?
    1
  7. ImproveSynthSational Either Trump didn’t know about Manafort’s criminal history and therefore sucks at performing background checks or he knew and didn’t care. As for evidence of ties to Russia: - George Papadopoulos lies about using Russian contacts to arrange meetings between Trump and Putin: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-campaign-adviser-pleaded-guilty-to-lying-about-russian-contacts/2017/10/30/d525e712-bd7d-11e7-97d9-bdab5a0ab381_story.html?utm_term=.57c5c608677a - The Donald Trump Jr. emails discussing plans to get the Russians to find dirt on Hillary: https://www.npr.org/2017/07/11/536670194/donald-trump-jr-s-emails-about-meeting-with-russian-lawyer-annotated - The Trump Tower meeting was arranged to get dirt on Hillary. We know this because Rudy Giuliani JUST STRAIGHT UP ADMITTED IT ON TV Seriously, they couldn’t be spelling it out any clearer and you’re here going “Where’s the evidence?”
    1