Comments by "Hugh Jorgan" (@HughJorgan1) on "Late Night with Seth Meyers" channel.

  1. 1
  2. R Camacho, Boondoggle, lich109, mike racicot, and others in this section: Good points all around. I'm simply looking at the big picture. I'm also looking at the many great results from the summit. It's a 'glass half full' view of things. Trump took a great first step to repair the degradation of US/Russia relations due to Obama and Hillary's policies. I know it's hard for some to admit, but Trump has made some excellent decisions and has many major accomplishments in foreign policy. In less than 2 years. It appears many are unable/unwilling to admit there were great results from the Putin meeting (see my original comment). Many have clearly not watched the full press conference to get full context to each topic. The fake comedy shows are gleefully cherry picking a few clips and focusing on the few negatives (glass half empty). Worse, their propaganda just feeds the ignorance and enables those with TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome). Trump makes mistakes. And he misspeaks. A great leader admits his mistakes, which he's done. And his party legitimately called him out on a few comments. But it's illogical to ignore the great results and overall benefits to the US and world from the two world powers being diplomatic. And agreeing on many critical areas. If Obama or Hillary had had the exact same meeting and worked to improve relations, they'd be hailed by the fake comedy shows and media as being "statesman" and diplomatic. (except for Fox of course, they'd skewer them..;) It's also perplexing to me that anyone would think diplomacy with North Korea is a bad thing. Obama's ridiculous isolationist policy forced them to build their nuclear arsenal. Trump's trying to mitigate a brutal dictator starting WW3 and bombing key allies such as South Korea and Japan. Or even the US. I shake my head that anyone wouldn't look at starting diplomatic relations with NK as a great success for Trump and America. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. It's brilliant.
    1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. JC//DC....Myers and Colbert report on serious news stories. I agree they're expected to be funny when providing their opinion. But when they incessantly mislead, misinform and outright lie on their source material/opinions and provide a completely one-sided perspective, they cross the line from satire to propaganda. I put Maher in a different category of biased Liberal comedians. He regularly has guests on his show to provide a different perspective. And he regularly criticizes and jokes about his beloved Democrats. Something you'd never hear from Colbert and Meyers. In addition to their lies/lies-by-omission, Meyers and Colbert cherry-pick tiny snippets of news and footage. And regularly use quotes out of context. They've used fake pictures. Colbert even edited a Tweet on a very serious national issue to completely change the context to fit his propaganda. That's not "performing". It's a complete lack of personal integrity. A good example of such media/comedy show bias was the recent use of pictures of children in cages. The pictures were taken in 2014 under Obama. The clear goal of this lie was to support their propaganda and mislead on the recent border issue. This blatant lie should make people angry. I agree people don't need to watch their shows. But I also think it's important to bring facts and perspective to their propaganda vid's comment sections. Even though it's often hostile territory for logic! If I had a nickel for every time I've been called a "trumptard" or "russian bot" for simply stating facts. (or for every time someone used the 'orange' reference..;) I'm realistic though. I understand the vast majority of people getting their information from propaganda shows are unable/unwilling to have adult conversations or discuss serious issues. Most are incapable of even reading this far. They see a long comment and just reply with frustration/insults on how long the comment is. And most are only able to attack those they disagree with using insults or ad-hominem (the bottom 2 of the 7 levels of disagreement). Worse, this approach is often guaranteed to get lots of 'likes'...from others just like them. They feel empowered....and the cycle continues. I'll leave you with a thought. I firmly believe Meyers and Colbert are helping Trump and the Republicans. People have caught on to their game. They're tired of the lies and same basic jokes for over a year. They're tired of them creating issues where none exists. They're tired of cruel misplaced attacks on Melania or Ivanka, (etc). They're tired of being misled by propaganda cleverly disguised as 'satire'.
    1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. I think people are just happy the country's doing great in many key areas. For example, 1. Low income/working class families are enjoying economic gains not seen in 20 years. For example, the monthly unemployment rate for those without a HS diploma is the lowest since 2000. And for those with a diploma, its the lowest it's been since 2007. And contrary to propaganda, the unemployment rate for African Americans is lower under Trump than Obama. 2. Trump's tax reforms will prove to be the best legacy from his first term. Corporate investment has surged 9.3% in the past year. This translates into jobs and massive spending on infrastructure. 3. Related to 2, Trump FINALLY made the US corporate tax rate competitive with other developed countries. For example, the official reason Apple gave for investing $350 billion in US jobs/infrastructure was Trump's tax reforms. And the $350 billion was in addition to a $40 billion dollar "repatriation" tax they voluntarily repaid. 4 . On foreign policy, Trump is making great moves. For example, every recent President has promised to move the Israel embassy. He's the only one with the guts to do it. And getting North Korea to the table and starting important discussions will prove to be another great legacy from Trump's first term. It was a far better approach than Obama's ridiculous isolationist policy to NK (which forced them to build their nuclear arsenal). 5. National security is enhanced with better border protection and immigration processes. Trump's actions are similar to "deporter in chief" Obama... Who also was forced to separate families at the border and had significant travel/immigration restrictions on the same 7 countries in the recent Supreme Court decision. 6. Housing-starts show a significant post-2016 jump. It's one of the best overall indicators of any country's economy. Trump's policies are providing confidence and long term security for both consumers and investors.
    1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1