Comments by "Hugh Jorgan" (@HughJorgan1) on "Law&Crime Network" channel.

  1.  @hellowell3743  …I agree. They all believed Heard and assumed he was guilty. It’s as idiotic as assuming the SNL guys are guilty, which is the view of a bunch of people in the comment section.
    4
  2. We all know this incident would be national news if he looked different.
    4
  3. He called his supervisor. Clearly they have strict protocols. Here’s an idea, the professor asks the cop to look up the dean’s phone number, calls him, and follows proper protocols.
    4
  4. Comply with officer orders and live. It’s such a simple concept.
    4
  5.  @spaycee9082  …I’m speculating that if he was pulled over 7 times in 2 weeks the illegal tinted windows may have been the reason. Georgia’s law is 32% tint max. It’s also mentioned in the vid description area he was pulled over for both the license plate issue and the tinted windows. The cop should have mentioned it.
    4
  6. Griner hates America. Maybe she should find another country.
    3
  7. @Pro Crastinator  ..I was dead serious. I’m a huge Hitchens fan. One of the greatest minds of our time. If I was being ironic or sarcastic I would’ve added a winky face ;)
    3
  8.  @theresasagner7215  …True, but the whole story was very suspicious. Particularly not knowing his Dean’s phone number or immediately asking the campus cop to look it up.
    3
  9.  @Mitch_Conner75926  …Truth is best explained as facts, evidence and reality. It’s NOT beliefs, presumptions, superstition, paranoia, bias, or suspicion. It’s really not a difficult concept to understand.
    3
  10.  @Stonemojo1  …Facts.
    3
  11. Glad they appear ok and glad impairment isn't suspected. It was just stupidity.
    3
  12. I support the blue but these particular cops should be on desk duty for the rest of their careers.
    3
  13. Criminals tend to be afraid of cops.
    3
  14. Megyn Kelly is 52. Try to wrap your head around that.
    3
  15. Yet another example of non compliance leading to death. When will these idiots learn.
    3
  16. I haven’t been following this trial but got updated yesterday. While I disagree with Jones insane theory Sandy Hook was a hoax I was shocked he was found liable. He can’t be responsible for idiots who harassed families and he certainly shouldn’t be financially punished for hurting someone’s feelings. That’s like blaming Alice Cooper for school shooters. More importantly, Jones’ opinions are protected by free speech. It’s mind boggling we now live in a world where opinions are criminalized.
    3
  17. Breaking the window was unnecessary.
    3
  18. Biden’s America. Or more accurately, Biden’s Handlers America.
    3
  19. @Elegant Jihad  ..There’s 7 levels of effective debate/argument in Graham’s Hierarchy. From worst to best: 1. Using strictly insults. 2. Using strictly ad hominem. 3. Attacking the tone or style of communication of the other person. 4. Contradiction 5. Counter argument, which almost always involves using examples of a similar topic or concept. It also includes pointing out double standards (also known as hypocrisy). 6. Refutation using examples, quotes, etc (it could be argued Jones’ lawyer was also achieving this level) 7. Completely refuting the central point of the argument. I think more people need to learn these principles, particularly those on the left. In my experience, they usually have great difficulty getting beyond level 1 or 2.
    2
  20. @jay322bn  …I always love a reference to the late, great Christopher Hitchens! One of the all time best at debating and arguing a point.
    2
  21. @Saje  …We disagree what constitutes an insult. As a man I wouldn’t be remotely insulted by your statement. I would just think “Well, I have a lot of compassion so unfortunately Saje has dealt with some men who don’t”. See how that works? Now back to my “level 1 and 2” statement. Applying the same logic, if you were on the left and always argued at level 4 or higher you shouldn’t see my statement as insulting. Another tactic you could’ve originally used as part of a counter argument would be to call my claim a generalization, which you did in your most recent comment with the “tiny fraction” point. Had you called my original comment a generalization and perhaps mentioned that, in your experience, it’s those on the right who resort to insults you would’ve made a point difficult for me to refute. Instead, you got stuck at level 3. I hope you learned something today. Always stay at level 4 or higher! Thanks for the chat, have a good one.
    2
  22.  @prof.crastinator  …Lol, thanks for proving all my points! And you’re still stuck at level 3. Worse, you lowered yourself to levels 1 and 2. I encourage you to study the facts I presented on Grahams Hierarchy and learn about effective ways you can disagree with people. Have a good one.
    2
  23.  @prof.crastinator  ..You make a fair point on how I presented Graham’s Hierarchy. It is indeed supposed to be a pyramid. I shouldn’t have numbered the 7 levels, or at least I should’ve reversed the numbering. You can learn a lot from “Seje” in this section. Like you he/she started off at level 3 regarding my original comment. She said it was an “insult” to those on the left. After we chatted for a bit he/she quickly moved beyond level 3 and got into levels 4 and 5 (contradiction and counter argument). For example, Seje pointed out my original comment was a generalization, which it was. I congratulated Seje on her good counter argument. Meanwhile, you remained obsessed with the fact you were called out for being at the lower levels of disagreement/debate. You just dug yourself deeper and deeper, resorting to calling me a “troll” numerous times. I didn’t read every comment, let’s just say it was the worst possible approach you could’ve taken because it proved all my original points correct. I’ve been wrong many times. When it happens I just admit it and move on. It appears this is a lesson you’ve yet to learn. Hopefully this experience will help. And if nothing else, you at least know about Graham’s Hierarchy now. It will help you considerably in the future, particularly if you’re tempted to make leftist arguments using only insults or ad hominem. Thanks for the chat and I’m glad to have educated you. I won’t be replying to any subsequent comments as I have a lot more people to educate. Have a good one.
    2
  24. Whenever I hear “doomsday cult” I think of Christianity. And a bunch of comments in this section validate this opinion.
    2
  25. 4:05….After all that destruction the store worker still hadn’t called 911???!! WTF was he waiting for?
    2
  26. There’s only a few of us in this section thinking logically. See my comment above.
    2
  27.  @JohnAdams-mu7xd  ..There’s lots of nefarious things going on and it’s perfectly ok to ask questions and be a skeptic. In fact, we need more of that in our country, particularly with the mindless, brainwashed left taking over. But once facts and the truth are known it’s time to move on. Jones clearly has great difficulty doing that. A sign of high intelligence is admitting when you’re wrong.
    2
  28.  @stereoplexus  …Fair point. I definitely could’ve worded that better.
    2
  29.  @krystalcasey  ..I just read your other comment. I’m also an atheist, which makes it tough to be a conservative sometimes. I’m surrounded with people forcing their beliefs on me. Worse, many conservatives think you HAVE to believe in the Christian God to be conservative. Such a claim is ludicrous and I have to educate them that conservatism ideology is both political and social, with religious beliefs just a small part of the latter.
    2
  30. Her parents did a great job teaching her about “stranger danger”.
    2
  31. Completely irrelevant to his defamation suit but very entertaining.
    2
  32. YouTube’s censorship of comments is getting out of hand. Their left/liberal bias is obvious. They don’t want facts discussed, particularly in an election year. I’d mention a few examples of what I’m talking about but my comment would be deleted.
    2
  33. I have a sneaking suspicion Spacey is currently battling Monkeypox.
    2
  34.  @kennethrainwater1611  …On that topic I have 3 comments in this section not counting this one. Do you see them?
    2
  35. How does he walk around with balls that big?
    2
  36.  @edwinnube3711  …Were any of the idiots who harassed victim families charged? Honest question.
    2
  37.  @gustavovieira1095  …Explain what you mean. What definition am I missing? “Defamation” is far different than physically harassing or threatening people.
    2
  38. I assume you’re in training to be a cop or want to sign up to serve and protect?
    2
  39. @David Fischer  …So true. Hitch and Jones in the same room would’ve been gold. Or imagine Hitchens debating Shapiro or Michael Knowles! Or Crowder. Pick any topic and I’d have paid big money to watch. Hitchens would’ve destroyed the recent leftist movement in our country while at the same time destroying religious conservatism. And if he was alive he’d still be vigorously defending our Constitution despite being born in the UK. I like to trot out ‘Hitchens’ Razor’ every now and then. It’s applicable in so many discussions/debates nowadays.
    1
  40. @Pro Crastinator  ..Oh now I get it. I thought you were talking about my Hitchens comment. When I stated that those on the left rarely get by level 1 or 2 I wasn’t involved in a debate with another person. I was simply stating a fact based on my experience. Therefore it’s not ad hominem.
    1
  41. @Saje  …Lol, nope…it wasn’t an insult either. Again, I wasn’t in a debate with someone. I simply made a factual statement about my experiences debating those on the left.
    1
  42.  @j.thomasgough4284  …Nope, it’s pointing out the hypocrisy of treating one batch of lies or misinformation different from another batch of lies or misinformation. It’s a completely valid form of counter argument.
    1
  43.  @j.thomasgough4284  …A VERY expensive whoopsie lol.
    1
  44.  @RR-qf9re  …I’m not perfect and flawless but I sure don’t have a victim mentality like the professor. A “moment of frustration” would’ve been him just getting angry. Instead, he played victim.
    1
  45.  @independenceboyd2042  ... Please define what you mean by "truth" in the context of this topic.
    1
  46. If you want a better take on the raid go watch Alan Dershowitz on Megyn Kelly. He destroys Merrick Garland and the FBI.
    1
  47. Everyone’s complimenting the officer but my bad-cop radar went off when he started telling the guy how he’s wearing a camera and “can’t pretend” he didn’t see something. It implies he would if he could.
    1
  48. Might have been a different result if the guy’s dad told the cops it was just a BB gun. I assume he didn’t know.
    1
  49. He’s a candidate for the “World’s Dumbest Criminals” compilation.
    1
  50. The death penalty exists but one juror prevented it from being the sentence.
    1