Comments by "Aaron Okeanos" (@AaronOkeanos) on "Rebel HQ" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 5
  3. 5
  4. 5
  5. 5
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 5
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. I actually read a little about mail-in voting in this case in Pennsylvania. I know how it works in general: - You ask your local administration for registration and then need to apply for mail-in voting where they check that you are an US citizen, 18 year old, live in the state for at least 30 days and had not a felony conviction in the last 5 years. - They send it to you when it's time. - You make your cross and put it in the inner envelop. No names or signatures there so noone knows what you personally voted for. - You sign the form and put the form and the inner envelop in the outer envelop and send it back or drop it in the box. - They open the outer envelop and check your signature and registration and cross you off a list so you cannot send a 2nd one or someone else is voting with your credentials. - The inner envelop is securely stored and cannot be opened before 7PM on election day to be checked and counted. But although this system was pretty water-proof and there have only been a handful cases of mail-in voting fraud over decades they raised security even a little more. - Apparently you now also need to also bring Voter-ID when you want to register for voting and apply for mail-in voting - You can now follow your mail-in vote like a package-tracker on a website. Once they checked the outer envelop against the voter registry they put a barcode on it and feed it the computer. You can see that online to check if your vote was received and accepted for counting on election day. I find that quite reassuring to make sure everything was okay with the mail-in ballot, that it will be counted on election day and that they not remove your vote without you knowing or when they removed you from the registration list without your knowledge.
    5
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 5
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. The "nuclear-family" was not as good as they think. This is part of the illussion we call "good old times". But were they so good? The model of the "nuclear family" is not even possible anymore since you need 2 or 3 jobs in a family to sustain it meaning both parents have to work which destroys the concept of the child-caring mother. See even there close-mindedness and misogyny baked in. Maybe the father wants to care and the mother would prefer to work. The solution would be to raise wages massively back again to 70ties level so one parent can feed a family with one job but tell that to corporate america. Most other problems families have to deal with come from this lack of money because money funds everything housing, living standard, abilties to deal with crisis and problems, education, childcare, elderly care/social care, decent living area, some luxuries, vacation and entertainment to not just work but life once in a while, etc. Divorce was harder or impossible and not treated well in society meaning the women could not easily leave again. This gave power to the men and in some families this was exploited, women become slaves disguised under the name "housewife". And sometimes even domestic violence, rape, child abuse all disguised under "marrigage" and "family matters" and the police rarly get involved because it was considered a "family problem". The greed of already rich people and corporations destroys family life and the so called "nuclear family" together with misconceptions about family and biggotted and powerhungry losers who need to be king somewhere and decide to excert that power at least in their family.
    5
  30. 5
  31. 5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 5
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 5
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4