General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Perry Douglas
Candace Owens
comments
Comments by "Perry Douglas" (@PerryDouglas-v5h) on "Candace Owens" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
He’s not black at all! His father was Indonesian, but not Lolo.
11
1st Asian & Whyte mixed President
10
I have a copy of John Eastman’s Newsweek essay challenging her eligibility in 2020. As well as an appeal for a hearing that was taken to the D.C. Court of Appeals in August 2020, which the individual wasn’t even heard out because of being a private citizen, the Chief Judge of the court is an Indian immigrant that Obama appointed, and both Barr and Roberts ignored this man’s requests to get him a hearing!
10
@BrownBrown270 Yeah, like the U.S.A. was really overthrown by GB with theor infiltrator Arthur in 1881 deep!
6
@SharylHopper Look up SUBUD. It’s founder was his real father. They still have temples in Hawaii today. Both the names Stanley Ann Dunham and Loretta Fuddy are in records of this cult.
6
@briandaly7236 A big problem is you are all on a platform that makes sure a lot of truth and facts are shut up and unseen!
6
@NomiVou They succeeded in 1881! POTUS 21 was a Brit born in Canada!
5
Should have voted for the real American black in 2008. Alan Keyes.
4
I have a copy of John Eastman’s Newsweek essay challenging her eligibility in 2020. As well as an appeal for a hearing that was taken to the D.C. Court of Appeals in August 2020, which the individual wasn’t even heard out because of being a private citizen, the Chief Judge of the court is an Indian immigrant that Obama appointed, and both Barr and Roberts ignored this man’s requests to get him a hearing!
4
@AshleyChen-q1t Question! Do you think that guy whose name could be misspelled Cruise by ppl who don’t any better, is eligible? A lot of citizens do! BUT! He was born in Canada. And ever since the Naturalization Act of 1795, the natural-born birthright citizen can not be born outside the U.S.A..
4
@susannemac2800 Muhammad was an Indonesian Muslim and and 60 when his son was born. His father was NOT Barack, or Lolo!
4
Clues! Jacob Leon Rubenstein. Mickey Cohen. Meyer Lansky. Barry Goldwater.
3
@AshleyChen-q1t We have 3 level or tiers of citizenship since 1790 and if accepting a specific fraudulent decision made in 1898. They are… “naturalized” citizen - someone who is naturalized as a citizen “native born” citizen - someone who is born in the country, or someone who is born abroad of at least one citizen “natural-born” citizen - born in the country and of parents who are citizens
3
@Nomadic9900 American History 101 The “natural-born, or native citizen, are the child born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”. - The Law of Nations (1758) 👈 The origin and the definition! The U.S. Constitution. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 requires one is a “natural born Citizen” to be President. The 12th Amendment holds the VP to the same requirement. Our true laws were being upheld in 1961 and 1964!
3
@NomiVou VP 20 & POTUS 21 was really born a William C.A. Arthur. He was born of a British citizen father and British subject mother, which would have left him born a British subject even IF he had been born in VT U.S.A.. But he wasn’t! He was born in Dunham, Quebec. Arthur is 1 of only 3 ppl to occupy both of those offices since 1850 that wasn’t born of 2 U.S. citizen. Now read the above part again!
3
@G.G.C. Resources on the web show they were considered citizens from 1948 until 1963 with the Kenya Independence Act of 1963. But this is all irrelevant anyway. Barack Obama wasn’t the father and Mr, Soebarkah, son of Sumohadiwidjojo, was born in Hawaii. But not of 2 citizens and under very taboo circumstances!
3
A certain cult have temples in Hawaii. His long deceased Indonesian father founded this cult. He was 60 when his son was born. S.A. Dunham and L. Fuddy are in records of this cult. Personally I think Fuddy was the true mother. She would have been 47 years younger than the father at the time!
2
@Tammy-v9f Tammy, let me give you a big hint! I guarantee if there was a survey of native citizens born in the country up until the late 2000s, it would be only those born in the country of 2 citizens that have a legitimate birth certificate!
2
She wasn’t born of 2 citizens. She would not have been treated as a “natural born Citizen” and would not have been issued a birth certificate in 1964. In addition to this, as the claimed parents were in the county on temporary student visas, she would not have even of been eligible to be a “native born Citizen”. The only way she could have become a citizen is if she had been naturalized as a “naturalized Citizen”, but that would have required at least one parent being naturalized beforehand.
2
@ Thank you! My father was a devout Christian and I recall him mentioning that to me at one time.
2
@Nomadic9900 He was born in Hawaii, but that’s not the real issue and there’s a lot more to it. I’m a bit of a historian of the history of our citizenship laws.
2
@Nomadic9900 Chief, the lie that anyone born on our soil are born the level of citizenship eligible to be President and Vice President, seriously began in 2008! I’m 9th generation American and deal with it, I know more about American History than most citizens today!
2
Facts! That will probably get my comment deleted, despite their being 100% verifiable facts and undeniable! Only 2 Presidents since 1838 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens and in the country. Only 3 people in both offices since 1850 weren’t born of 2 U.S. citizens, and 2 of these 3 weren’t born of a citizen at all. The 1st was VP #20 and POTUS #21. Born of a British citizen father and British subject mother at a time when children born outside GB of British citizen fathers alone, were 100% born British subjects and within allegiance owed to GB, no matter where they were born!
2
@ It shouldn’t be hard for you to figure out. Also this! The original U.S. Constitution clearly states one must have been a Citizen before the Adoption of the Constitution, or a natural born Citizen to be President. The 12th Amendment holds the VP to the same requirement. President Zachary Taylor who passed in 1850 was the last who was a citizen before the adoption of the Constitution.
2
It depends on the woman. I also don’t respect Kamala or Hillary.
2
@ Yeah, sure, thanks for now 16 years of being called crazy and told I don’t know what I’m talking about by a bunch of people who don’t know a damn thing real about American History, because all they do is read bullshit on the web!
2
HIS FATHER WASN’T BARACK! Get it through your thick skulls. His real father was an Indonesian Muslim named Muhammad Subuh Sumohadiwidjojo! You can find a lot of info about him on the web. But take it with a grain of salt.
2
Many believe the U.S.A. was completely destroyed and secretly absorbed into the Commonwealth of Nations in the 1930s. Although the U.S.A. took a massive blow to its independence and sovereignty in 1881 when a British subject born in Canada named William C.A. Arthur took office as VP and had Garfield taken out so he could be Prez.
2
These are the 3 levels or tiers of U.S. citizenship since naturalization laws began in 1790 and if accepting a fraudulent decision made in 1898. “naturalized” Citizen - someone naturalized as a naturalized Citizen “native born” Citizen - a child born in the country and this is if accepting the fraudulent decision made in 1898, or a child born of at least one citizen parent abroad “natural born Citizen” - born in the county of parents who are citizens If you believe anything other than this, you’re wrong!
2
That’s his real dad! 👉 https://youtu.be/XkcaQLoz2ps?si=PsIDSlSFA4oqgSi5
1
@Tammy-v9f The long from certificate he was supplied with in April 2011. Are you familiar with the investigation that was launched on this certificate? If not, you can find videos of the investigation here! Two things to keep in mind here. It was supplied to him by that L. Fuddy, and Stanley Ann’s name on it was determined to be pieced together, forged.
1
@Tammy-v9f I wish I could give you more, but this platform are deleting and hiding most of my comments.
1
It’s this simple, Candace. A 14th Amendment “Citizen” is not the same level as a natural born Citizen. Making it impossible she was born one! Also making it impossible Vivek and Nikki were born one! But no one will ever see this, if it’s not deleted right away!
1
@GettingSchwiftyy The U.S. Constitution took a critical hit in Nov of 2009 with a 100% fraudulent decision made at one court of appeals. McCain, Obama, Harris and Newsom are all tied to this!
1
@ This platform make it impossible to tell all the truth about VP 20 & POTUS 21, Arthur. But for starters, British law in the early 1800s was that children born of fathers who were British citizens or subjects in itself and abroad, were born 100% entirely British subjects and subject to the jurisdiction of Great Britain, no matter where they were born. Meaning all of the Arthur children were born British subject, whether in Canada, or the states.
1
Most citizens today are so enormously ignorant that they seriously believe our birthright citizenship laws are the same as Great Britain’s, because of fake stuff made up since 2008. That nothing in America’s recorded history predating it, backs up at all! In fact everything in the 1800s reaffirmed the child can not be born of foreigners!!!
1
It was and maybe still is in the Wikipedia page about Shyamala, a claim that she was an instrumental figure in the creation of the Black Panther Party in 1960s Oakland. If it’s true!
1
Use all of your brain power here! You can figure it out, I believe in you!!! U.S. Constitution Article II “natural born Citizen” 14th Amendment “Citizens” These are different levels of citizenship! Yet you most likely believe the amendment means anyone born in the country are born the latter. But how could this be when they’re not the same level of citizenship!?
1
Only 3 people to occupy both of those offices since 1837 were not born of 2 U.S. citizens. The 1st of these 3 was President Arthur (1881-1885). In reality he was born a British subject named William Chester Alan Arthur, of 2 British parents, in a place called Dunham Flats, in what is now Dunham, Quebec. Now something else is, even if he had been born in VT U.S.A., U.S. law at the time was children were born the nationality of their father, and British law was children born of Brit were born entirely subject to the jurisdiction of Great Britain, no matter where they were born. Now who are the other 2? Well 1 was supposedly the child of a Stanley Ann… You know the other!
1
Only 3 people to occupy both of those offices since 1837 were not born of 2 U.S. citizens. The 1st of these 3 was President Arthur (1881-1885). In reality he was born a British subject named William Chester Alan Arthur, of 2 British parents, in a place called Dunham Flats, in what is now Dunham, Quebec. Now something else is, even if he had been born in VT U.S.A., U.S. law at the time was children were born the nationality of their father, and British law was children born of Brit were born entirely subject to the jurisdiction of Great Britain, no matter where they were born. Now who are the other 2? Well 1 was supposedly the child of a Stanley Ann… You know the other!
1
The “natural-born”, the framers took it from The Law of Nations. Vattel, 1758. Where the initial definition is! The Law of Nations, that is given inclusion within the original Constitution!!!
1
@justanobserver5079 Let me help you. Here’s all the proof you need. The 14th Amendment “Citizen” is not the same as a natural born Citizen and hasn’t been since the founding of the nation in 1776. The “Citizen” in America’s history, is the shortened form of “native born Citizen”, and you will see usage of both in America’s recorded history. These are the 2 earliest of our 3 levels of citizenship, pre-1790 naturalization. This makes it impossible she was born a natural born!
1
@justanobserver5079 Late 2009. A falsehood was created with 1 fraudulent decision at 1 court. In late 2009. A falsehood was created about a specific historical decision made in 1898. The falsehood created is that he was granted natural born status, so that the falsehood could be created that anyone born in the country were and are. This falsehood is not backed by the recorded history of the 1898 decision, or anything else predating it and up until the founding of the country. This falsehood also was not present and relevant in 1961 or 1964. The falsehood is only 15 years old.
1
True story. From 1789 until 2008 it was acknowledged and upheld that us natural born birthright citizens are born of 2 U.S. citizens. Nothing valid and legal has ever changed these requirements and you’ve been lead to believe lies created since 2008!
1
@ Not sure. Maybe you shouldn’t have removed my comment, then I could know what it was.
1
@Felinefobia It was probably the platform, or CO’s channel operator then.
1
@ If you want a simple answer, here. All records predating 2008 prove that children had to be born in the country of parents who are citizens. Plural! As I am stating all records predating 2008, you can assume this would have been upheld in 1964!
1
@Tia.0721 Tia, here’s the skinny. A lot of corrupt started making a lot of stuff up in 2008 and our citizenship laws were corrupted. This corruption didn’t exist when she was born in ‘64!
1
Fact. If you believe anyone born in the country are a natural born birthright citizen, it IS because you are brainwashed to believe stuff made up since the late 2000s! Stuff that nothing in America’s recorded history predating it, backs up at all.
1
The “natural-born” comes from The Law of Nations (Vattel, 1758). This is where the framers of the Constitution took it from. The definition of one of us is in it, and she’s not one of us!!!
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All