Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1.  @darlenehowell2274  A lot more of what? You haven't shown anything. A lot more of nothing?
    1
  2.  @darlenehowell2274  "No, you called me scared. My posting "Scared" as a question was to mock" You appear to be scared to post any evidence. Yes.
    1
  3.  @MFitz12  Yeah she's a few cards short of a deck.
    1
  4.  @wilhelmbeck8498  "Keep shouting buddy" What sort of response is this? I asked you a question. You're talking about shouting. Is there something wrong with you?
    1
  5.  @darlenehowell2274  "This is stuff that I've posted to you before." You've posted no evidence so far. You have no evidence.
    1
  6.  @darlenehowell2274  Yes when you add numbers up they add up to other numbers. Very good. You keep this up and you will pass grade school. "These few things that I'm beating you up " By adding up numbers? 🤣🤣 You're not right in the head.
    1
  7.  @darlenehowell2274  "The Occult Sciences are over your head." Your fantasy isn't science. Ah I get it... so if the numbers 1 or 9 or 4 or 5 or 2 or 3 or 8 or 7 are involved it's all a conspiracy. You're really onto something! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  8.  @darlenehowell2274  1 or 9 or 4 or 5 or 2 or 3 or 8 or 7 It's a conspiracy! Wow you're so much smarter than everyone for noticing. 😂
    1
  9.  @darlenehowell2274  "It's only a conspiracy if the number 6 is present." 🤣🤣
    1
  10.  @darlenehowell2274  Why are you working so hard to try and convince me? Your arguments, if they could be called that, are the worst I've ever heard from a conspiracy theorist. I've debated flat earthers and your arguments are worse. Just stop.
    1
  11.  @jason8952  Sure thing crazy person 👍
    1
  12.  @jason8952  You've only presented nonsense and confusion.
    1
  13.  @jason8952  Your insane babbling isn't confusing. It's childish fantasy.
    1
  14.  @jason8952  Why are you still talking to me?
    1
  15.  @darlenehowell2274  Can you prove that they were? Go ahead.
    1
  16.  @darlenehowell2274  Can you prove that they were? Go ahead. Still waiting. All you have are silly stories you can never prove.
    1
  17.  @jason8952  Making insane comments about wizards and spells isn't proving anything. That's you shooting yourself in the foot.
    1
  18.  @jason8952  " 1. Conventional thermite 2. Nano-thermite 3. Possibly mini-nucs? I believe all 3 were used." 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  19.  @jason8952  " Nano-thermite can achieve what occurred in the basement for sure." What do you think occurred in the basement? Why would you even put an incendiary in the basement? The buildings collapsed from the top down. Everything you speculate is ridiculous.
    1
  20.  @jason8952  "Conventional thermite is an incendiary. " Yes kid I know. "Conventional thermite is an incendiary. " Show me it in action then. Show me an example of it taking down a structure. Show something. Of course you can't. Your whole argument is fantasy.
    1
  21.  @jason8952  "Nano-thermite has a US patent no"- The fact that there is a patent doesn't make the conspiracy less ridiculous.
    1
  22.  @darlenehowell2274  " 2nd law of thermodynamics." LOL...Do you even know what the 2nd law of thermodynamics is!? Don't you mean Newton's second law? 😂😂 You're making a total fool of yourself. Show me your working with the 2nd law of thermodynamics then. Go on. "They temperatures are documented." Then prove it. Prove something. "The nuclear devices in question were built for use in construction." There is no evidence for any nuclear devices being involved. If you think you can find evidence then give it a go. Everything you say is confusion and fantasy. You're a clown.
    1
  23.  @darlenehowell2274  That's got nothing to do with the 2nd law of Thermodynamics! 🤣🤣 "Thus, office fires can't heat something hotter then they've burned." Nor did that happen on 9/11. So we've established that you have no idea about thermodynamics..or fires....or anything about this topic.
    1
  24.  @darlenehowell2274  "Basement temperatures exceeded 2800°F. In spots temps of 3400°F were recorded at GZ and lasted for weeks" Show your evidence for this.
    1
  25.  @darlenehowell2274  " Thermo-images from the fires at both towers recorded temps at the impact floors around 750°F just before collapse. " Actually no that didn't happen but either way 750F isn't very hot.
    1
  26.  @darlenehowell2274  " The laws of physics are on the side of the truthers." You've shown that you don't understand anything about physics.
    1
  27.  @darlenehowell2274  " It is not difficult to understand that we the people are being attacked by a shadow " People like to imagine all sorts of stupid things. No that isn't difficult to understand.
    1
  28.  @darlenehowell2274  "FF use thermo imaging. They have the devices on their trucks." You've been asked for evidence not stories.
    1
  29.  @darlenehowell2274  So you couldn't back anything up and you thought gibberish would be a good idea to compensate for that.
    1
  30.  @darlenehowell2274  Your posts aren't funny or entertaining.
    1
  31.  @darlenehowell2274  You're just confirming my last post. You're boring and dumb.
    1
  32.  @jason8952  If you think you have a point to make then make it.
    1
  33.  @jason8952  🤦‍♂
    1
  34. Yes! Still on the leaderboard. Crushing it.
    1
  35.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  You still don't seem to understand the collapse.
    1
  36.  @tomk.williams1186  WTC7 did not turn to dust.
    1
  37.  @jason8952  None of the buildings fell at free fall. The closest you can squirm up to that is that part of what was left of WTC7 was in virtual free fall in the later stages of the collapse. This isn't even surprising. It's been 20 years and you're still clinging to defeated arguments...
    1
  38.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  " ah, the child and his response." Yes that's exactly what you gave me. " I''ll bet a lazy million" You don't have a million.
    1
  39.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  That's all you've got? Why do you even bother when you're this hopeless?
    1
  40.  @darlenehowell2274  Prove it. To date you've never shown evidence for a single thing you've said. You don't care about evidence of course. When you live in a fantasy world of wizards and witches you just accept it all......uneducated...and gullible.
    1
  41.  @jason8952  Oh dear what mess do we have here. "That's stupid! " Feel free to show where I am wrong. "A natural righting?" Yep. " That's a complete violation of the laws of motion" Prove it. "That's not at all what the videos show." It's exactly what the videos show. Well that was a failure Jason. You might want to do better with the next post.
    1
  42.  @jason8952  What on earth are you babbling about? The antenna kept floors from hitting the ground? what? If you're going to respond to posts at least try to make a valid point.
    1
  43.  @jason8952  " No, the floors being demolished 94 95 96 ect... Is what kept the top 17 floors from continuing on their path to the street below. " This is nonsensical. The top 17 floors did continue on a path to the ground. " The downward part of the demolition started at the 93rd floor once the antenna reached the 93rd floor." This is also gibberish.. The downward part? Do collapses have an upward part? What on earth are you talking about? "How could an antenna stop 17 floors from hitting the ground? " It didn't. You're not connected to reality. "Then again, I am talking to the same liar that say he schooled me about the occult and then deleted the posts that prove he didn't" I can't delete posts you nutcase.
    1
  44.  @jason8952  "There is no way that the top portion of the tower twisted itself achieve greater destruction on that side so it could remain centered" What? You're obviously quite confused. I didn't say that it consciously moved in a certain direction so it could achieve something. " That's lunacy! " Yes all your posts are lunacy. " What would have happened is when the impacted floors gave the top portion would have followed it's leaning direction and slide on to the street. " You're confusing a 110 story structure with a tree. There isn't pivoting action that would allow this...nor would the structure hold together to allow such a pivot....nor is there a lateral force to make all that material do that. " Because power always takes the pathway of least resistance." Get someone to stand above and drop a brick on your head. Does the brick make a decision to dodge around you? Everything you post is utter nonsense. It's not just that your arguments have problems... it's that you don't ever begin to make sense.
    1
  45.  @jason8952  Your obsession with the antenna is weird. 'You make no logical argument with it. Firstly, show me a video where you can "can see the antenna hit the 93rd floor' as you claim. Secondly, you're still not making an argument that helps you. You've shown that you don't understand the progressive collapse. Your inability to understand isn't evidence for a demolition.
    1
  46.  @jason8952  "What's nonsensical is you bypassing the fact that I said, "power always takes the pathway of least resistance"." Power? lol.. no. You are stating something that you think sounds scientific but you're making a fool of yourself. Gravity pulls objects down. Objects do no move to the left of right to dodge what is below them. "It was leaning after the impact floor gave." I've explained to you why the leaning stopped. "It should have followed it's leaning path and slide down to the ground. " I have also addressed this. There isn't pivoting action that would allow this...nor would the structure hold together to allow such a pivot....nor is there a lateral force to make all that material do that. "Not go through the pathway of greatest resistance. That's nonsensical." Objects don't get to ignore physics because they want to dodge what is below them.
    1
  47.  @jason8952  "Did I use the word, "consciously"?" This is the argument you are making though. You are trying to claim that material makes a decision to change direction and go somewhere else to avoid resistance. You have no idea. " I just find interesting that you're so contrary." I refute all your nonsense yes.
    1
  48.  @jason8952  You probably don't get out much. Make sensible statements and I wont refute them.
    1
  49. After all these years there is still no evidence to support that.
    1
  50.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  🤦‍♂ Post this science you speak of..... lets see it.
    1