Comments by "Mark H" (@markh1011) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  You were called out to post this science you spoke of. What a surprise it was that you couldn't do it! 😂
    1
  2. "How come ALL of the first responders passed away within a year from types of cancer that show up after nuclear explosion?" Sigh...no they didnt all pass away. Some first responders did get cancer but there are peer reviewed papers pointing to the carcinogens in the pile causing it.
    1
  3. .....and?
    1
  4.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "John Lear's affidavit to this day has never been challenged" lol it's dismissed by everyone. Only people without an education would take him seriously. People like you.
    1
  5. The girders weakened. Not melted. The passport was never in the hot fires.
    1
  6.  @darlenehowell2274  No idea who you are troll. Wait were you the person who believed a wizard caused 9/11 with a magic spell? It's easy to get your nutcases confused.
    1
  7.  @darlenehowell2274  " I've proven that 911 was a Globalist/Luciferian Conspiracy." You think 9/11 was caused by a wizard casting a spell. Everyone can ignore your conclusions.
    1
  8. " In some of the photos you can see that supports were cut as 45 degree angles." Cut as part of the clean up.
    1
  9. "We also have videos in which you can hear explosives going off. " Lets see these videos then. No one else can seem to find them.
    1
  10.  @jason8952  What?
    1
  11.  @jason8952  Prove it. Oh that's right you can never prove anything you say.
    1
  12.  @jason8952  🤦‍♂ Hopeless.
    1
  13.  @jason8952  Ok
    1
  14. a lot did....and?
    1
  15.  @kifter4254  " you actually think 2 planes took down 3 towers on the same day??" Actually all the WTC buildings were collapsed or partially collapsed... WTC1-7....
    1
  16.  @kifter4254  There was no "missing 2.3 trillion". It was just unaccounted for in an audit...at the time...1 Here is what happened. Some time before 9/11 there was an audit done, as happens regularly. But some of the finances couldn't be accounted for. This was due to records not being available, different systems, old systems etc. Within 6 months of 9/11 most of it was reconciled. End of story. Nothing to do with 9/11 or the pentagon crash.
    1
  17.  @kifter4254  You seem to have some problems understanding simple concepts... but then again this is common in conspiracy theorists. It was never missing....they just couldn't account for it at the time during an audit..but most of it WAS accounted for within months. Nothing to do with 9/11... it wasn't announced on 9/11....nothing to do with the pentagon... most of it found anyway.... It's been nearly 20 years and these are the desperate empty claims the 9/11 conspiracy theorists are clinging to.... That says a lot.
    1
  18.  @kifter4254  "i mean we would know what happened but they decided to ship the evidence" So the only evidence is steel? You might want to think about that a bit more...
    1
  19.  @shahabkhan8537  Have you done more than 1 minute of research on this topic?
    1
  20.  @darlenehowell2274  So you followed up irrelevant babbling with... well..irrelevant and pathetic babbling. No one would be surprised. Go put your wizard cloak on and cast some spells...
    1
  21.  @rnbsteenstar  Sure sure where is the evidence?
    1
  22.  @rnbsteenstar  What? Explain.
    1
  23.  @sammyd9564  "They fell straight down at the speed of gravity" Ah yes....the speed of gravity.... what is the speed of gravity? Is it 10? Tell me.
    1
  24.  @sammyd9564  Sammy there is no such thing as the "speed of gravity"... at least not in the way you're trying to use it. Your use of that term shows you don't have a physics background. "10lb weight from the top of the building it would of hit the ground at the same time the collapsing bldg did." False. Debris was noted outpacing dropping building. "There was NO way it could of fallen at the same free fall rate of the 10lb weight. " It didn't.
    1
  25.  @sammyd9564  _ The towers fell in about 9 seconds. That is pretty much the rate of free fall for that height."_ Your assurances of "pretty much" aren't solid evidence. We can see on the collapse videos that the falling debris outpaced the dropping building. So the debris was in free fall... the building were dropping slightly slower. " The towers fell in about 9 seconds. That is pretty much the rate of free fall for that height." It it wasn't free fall then there was some resistance. "The top section would of decelerated when impacting the intact structure(floors) below. " No. Due to the progressive collapse, as each floor was destroyed it added to the material that was falling on the floors below. You're thinking of the collapse as a 20 V 90 impact... there is a little more to it than that. "Science n newtons 3rd law says this." Newton's third law will guide you about each individual impact....but there were thousands of impacts involved in this collapse.
    1
  26.  @sammyd9564  "No bldg made of steel n concrete has ever collapsed in the history of the US due to a fire" It's happened before in other countries. Fire and steel are the same in other countries. "So never before...and that day 3 fell to fire" Wrong and wrong. It's happened before. The towers didn't collapse due to just fire. WTC 7 collapsed due to fire, but as I have mentioned this is nothing new or unique. "All the same way." No the collapses were different. "I dont buy it." You don't have all the facts and your analyses so far about the collapse have been wrong.
    1
  27.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  People don't take that seriously. For good reason.
    1
  28.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "Over 3500 civil eng's do take it very seriously, why do you lie?" You can't even get this right. The AE911 list isn't just engineers and isn't even just civil engineers. In fact there are very few structural engineers involved. If their case is so strong then why does the scientific community dismiss it? Oh I'll tell you - because it's garbage.
    1
  29.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  Science doesn't progress from an affidavit nor does it progress from an internet list of a relatively tiny amount of people in the field. There are millions of architects and engineers globally. The number they have is so bad that it actually words against them. Oh and I've read many of the statements they provided when signing up and many did no research on the topic at all.
    1
  30.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "Happy to see you in court any day with the entire list of signatures, say when??" Go for it. Do your worst. This should be good.....
    1
  31.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "I Said ''Say when??''" I said Go for it. Do your worst. lol... you've got nothing.
    1
  32.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "Where did I state ''The AE911''?" You referenced their list. Have you got another list that you think you're referencing it. Lets see it then.
    1
  33.  @c.augustedupin2559  Go to the video WTC Angle Cut Columns during cleanup ... someone from the clean up crew points at diagonally cut columns while explaining what they are doing.
    1
  34.  @c.augustedupin2559  Of course. Was that the best response you could come up with? lol
    1
  35.  @c.augustedupin2559  Why do you bother? Your responses are pathetic, troll. lol
    1
  36.  @jason8952  "You mean like the time that you confused Leslie Robertson's tail about the core columns needing "lateral load support" from the floor trusses " The core was provided lateral support from the trusses and perimeter columns. "Yet he said, "I saw molten steel" Most likely he meant 'molten metal' as no one actually tested the molten materials seen.
    1
  37.  @jason8952  "I've been speaking with you for over 4 yrs." You've spent 4 years on this? You don't even know the basics?!
    1
  38.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  A loony making a claim is irrelevant.
    1
  39. "Explain the micro spheres in the world trade" There are various explanations for those. Fly ash, friction in the collapse, the clean up, the construction, the fires - look up melting point depression. "It's called thermite" There is still zero evidence for thermite being used.
    1
  40. "Jet fuel cannot heat steel to 1000*C." You still don't understand the basics of this topic do you?
    1
  41.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "I understand the ''BASICS'' of this TOPIC very well" From your posts, no you don't.
    1
  42.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  " The bottom 80 floors were 100% intact," Until the upper block smashed down, starting a progressive collapse. A concept you still cannot grasp.
    1
  43.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "How does a 100% intact structure fail??" The rest of the structure came down on it. It's funny how you take 70-80% of the structure and treat that as a single structure and refer to 100% of that single structure.... what a bizarre argument.
    1
  44. "Conspiracy theorists say jet fuel fires couldn't have brought down the towers" Actually the official story was that impacts, fires and gravity brought down the towers. But you've never got anything right so far so why start now.... "Example, how much energy would it take to heat 20,000 tons of concrete and steel just 1 degree C?" The towers didn't collapse because of heated concrete. As for the weakening of steel, it would be down to around 50% strength at a mere 600C and building fires exceed 600C and can even exceed 1000C. "How much heat was lost thru the 1000's of tons of lattice that cold fall morning?" If only it were that simple that the heat just disappears... you would need fire protection strategies or the fire department.
    1
  45.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  " It's not Legal, " lol... I assure you it most certainly is legal to reference facts.
    1
  46.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  Science doesn't progress with affidavits... lol... 🤦‍♂ So the facts remain. Your argument has been easily refuted.
    1
  47.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  " Once again, just your opinion" Physics is not merely my opinion. "You'll never get how the braced core fell to bits over the line, " Over the line? What line? What argument are you trying to make? Do you even know? lol
    1
  48.  @yabbadabbadoo8225  "try much harder." No need. You're so lost on this topic that it's easy to run rings around you.
    1
  49. A decade later and still none of these claims have been verified.
    1
  50.  @darlenehowell2274 Not only do you know nothing about science, you don't understand the difference between reality and fantasy. Go away crazy person.
    1