General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Dan A
DW News
comments
Comments by "Dan A" (@DanA-nl5uo) on "DW News" channel.
Previous
17
Next
...
All
@CentauriSphere lol you not me tried to deflect to the other human rights issues.
1
Karma when the ff industry heavy gulf gets hit by bigger hurricanes from climate change.
1
@suportbghelp4938 the free market has spoken wind solar and storage is the cheapest form of new energy generation today
1
@ЕмилЕфендулов the result is the same either way there is no need for more capacity
1
@jamesphilip6737 I don't know one of the two extremist on the right the one from Colorado went into Congress bankruptcy 2 years ago her bar literally in bankruptcy and she is worth something like 44 million dollars now. That seem pretty successful
1
@jamesphilip6737 give her more time Nancy Pelosi had 4 decades to profit off her position. You won't win trying to measure who is more currupt the party of Trump has plenty of crimes to answer for. The wealthy oligarchy owns both parties
1
@jamesphilip6737 44 million in 2 years or a little over 100 million in 40 years. And you think the 44 million is less curruption? You suck at math
1
@jamesphilip6737 it is only irrelevant if you lack a understand of how wealth compounds over time.
1
@jamesphilip6737 you are somehow the one that thinks either party is not wealthy even thought the former president made a point of showing off how wealthy he was leading the GOP
1
@jamesphilip6737 lol no he didn't use his office to get tax cuts that he benefits from oh wait he did do that. If you believe trump didn't use the office of the president to enrich himself I have a bridge to sell you it has a great view of Brooklyn.
1
@jamesphilip6737 lol so the fact that the GOP was wealthy before hand somehow makes you feel trumps better. Priceless
1
@manumano3887 wrong they developed that technology with government funding where you sleeping through the entire last year when the governments paid those companies to develop the vaccine? By your logic the companies have no more claim to the intellectual property than the employees who did the work because both where paid by a 3rd party the government.
1
@manumano3887 the stock holders didn't fund the R&D they bought shares in a company who took government funding for R&D. They will still own their shares of the company's physical assets regardless of what happens to the technology the government grants funded.
1
@manumano3887 stock prices fell on the news that the monopoly and price gouging wouldn't work this time like it has with insulin? Wow you would think speculation was risky.
1
@manumano3887 actually when you register a patient with the us government they have the right to negate that patient protection you don't seem to understand the law. The current waiver is just one example of the ways they can. The Defense production act actually gives the government the right to take the entire company and nationalize the production lines not just use the intellectual property. Trumped signed the authorization of usage of the DPA with respect to covid so the stock holders should be happy their share price didn't drop to zero
1
@manumano3887 if you believe that share holders need to be compensated for their loses you need to read the fine print. All the investment ads on TV in the 1980s had the standard disclaimer that past performance is no guarantee of future results. That investing in the stock market entails risk of losing capital. Sorry if you didn't understand that simple fact when you made an investment.
1
@manumano3887 which is why the World Trade Organization is putting the waver together not government of any one country. See the WTO has the authority to act based on the agreement of all member countries. They signed that agreement in order to be part of the international trading committee.
1
@cloudpoint0 well according to that logic there is no harm in removing them either. So why not?
1
@cloudpoint0 why would they stop making vaccines a full 25% of their revenue in the last 3 months came from vaccines and you just said even ending the monopoly protection for them won't increase their competition. You seem to want it both ways. Make up your mind.
1
DW News should have included in this news story that coal is a major driving force behind the climate crisis which is making our planet not support human life. That we need to end the ussage of all ff if we want to keep living as a species. That both parties in this dispute need to find a new economy not dependent on ff which is killing our species.
1
@davezad the grains that where harvested last year will spoil before they can be transported? Seems like maybe they should have shipped them before the war started. But how good will the grains be if they are shipped by sea now if you can't load them into trucks before they rot????
1
@explorer0213 so all the farms in Ukraine are in Odessa??? That is amazing that they got 100% of the farm land bordering the port.
1
@jaaksavat7916 if the Democrats had pass legislation in the last half century the court would have been powerless
1
@karlhungusjr1 clearly they knew it wasn't settled or Obama wouldn't have said passing legislation to make it law was his #1 priority while campaigning before refusing to follow through when he had a veto proof super majority.
1
@karlhungusjr1 what is hilarious is your thinking that fundraising for both parties is equal when one delivers for their voters and the other doesn't.
1
@Bill Randleman lol you mean during a global pandemic the Democratic party spent money to address the crisis facing the entire planet??? What a horrible crime to have put the wellbeing of citizens over the wealthy of the caplistist class. But nice deflection from the point of this discussion I actually fell for it.
1
@karlhungusjr1 wow you are trying hard to miss the point.
1
@charlesvan13 someone doesn't understand the ruling. The Republicans are full of people pushing for federal government legislation to ban abortion so clearly they don't see this ruling in their favor blocking federal government action.
1
@charlesvan13 you clearly don't understand the ruling by the court. They pushed it back to Congress saying they didn't believe the courts have the right to rule as they did in Roe. But that doesn't change the fact that federal government has more authority than state government in our constitution. At the moment it falls to state laws because there is no federal law once Congress passes federal law it will become the law of the land regardless of what the states rule same as the federal court ruling in Roe applied to all 50 states making the more restrictive laws in the states non enforceable for the last half century because the states rights are limited by the federal government not the other way around.
1
@charlesvan13 lol your rant becomes useless when you hide behind "this court" tell me all I need to know you are just as authoritarian and fascist as they are
1
Now we know the cost of that "green natural gas" Putin wants to supply to Europe in Norstream 2. Putin now controls the oil fields that will power the EU since they classified ff as green.
1
@fear_reactor better would be replacing demand with renewable energy so we don't become part of the 6th mass extinction event. Otherwise who caused the extinction of humanity is kind of irrelevant.
1
@fear_reactor lol I live off grid solar already didn't give up a single thing except the monthly payment to the power company. But I love your comparing something we have no control over to something that is human caused by that logic we shouldn't have any laws.
1
@fear_reactor lol keep hunting you can convince yourself that we must commit genocide to have a modern society.
1
@justaguy113 well when the developed nations stop using ff something will happen because the economy of scale will end the era of cheap ff.
1
@phyarth8082 the middle east should blame themselves. They where the supplies of the ff that caused the climate crisis
1
@maxjakcker3273 we are definitely smart enough to change. It was our able to change things including our own lifestyle that got us into this mess over the last century or so. It isn't a question of intelligence it is a question of greed by the very few at the top vs the livelihood of our entire species. It is something like the top 10% wealth wise are responsible for more than half our carbon emissions. So the majority of the problem is a very small percentage of humanity's greed.
1
@littlefinger4509 360 million people in the USA, 1.398 billion people in china. When you have to use a different order of magnitude to count the people raw numbers don't tell you anything useful. Or another figure the top 1% of wealthy on planet earth produce more than twice the emmisions of the poorest 3.5 billion people. Only by looking at the per capita can you see that it is a lifestyle caused peoblem.
1
@littlefinger4509 you are intentionally missing the point the problem is the top 1% who generate more pollution than the bottom 3.5 billion humans on planet earth. The wealthy have to change their lifestyle because it is what caused the climate crisis. This isn't nature it is a man made climate crisis caused by a pollution based lifestyle of luxury for the wealthy
1
@littlefinger4509 again you intentionally miss represent the science. Of course there are natural sources of greenhouse gases but the science is clear the climate crisis is human caused. I am force to conclude that you are in the category of it is impossible to convince someone of something if their income is dependent on them not according it.
1
@vodkaboy the NOT in your statement means you don't have an answer to the question of where. Just trying to help you understand the English language.
1
It is almost like they should have held a primary.
1
@Thunder_Yoda the USA just gave the nuclear industry a 6 billion dollar bailout not to build new plants but just to keep existing one operating. That tells you how bad the ecominic situation is for nuclear power. You tell me which government has had to give solar or wind farms 6 billion dollars to keep operating after they where installed and the constitution costs paid for. Spoiler alert you can't because solar has zero operating costs. I know this because my solar system works without any additional mantaince.
1
@Pacjam123123 wow defending a monopoly profiteering off a global pandemic how sad. It is a good thing the government in the USA didn't feel the same way about the private sector during WWII. Then we simply took over the factories and told them what they would produce for the war effort because we believed it was a threat to all humanity. Today in a global pandemic you believe profits are more important than lives how sad.
1
@eduwino151 Inida is the worlds largest manufacturer of the covid vaccine. So much for your poorer countries who need the vaccine can't make it argument. Want to try again? These drug companies already spend the last half century outsourcing manufacturing to the very same countries you don't believe are able to mass produce the vaccine.
1
@eduwino151 millions you say.. wow that would be impressive if we didn't have 7.8 billion people needing two doses each of the vaccine. So you are excited that we will have millions of doses to fit a demand for 15.6 billion. Last time I checked billions are several orders of magnitude larger than millions. India alone needs 2.8 billion doses for their own population. But heck dont worry there will be millions to meet the needs of billions.
1
@eduwino151 they also used loads of government cash in 2020. The government paid for it they own it not the companies who where paid with goverment grants and contracts
1
@eduwino151 🤣🤣🤣🤣 oh now it is billions of doses from the existing companies just a post ago it was millions. I hope they dont pay you much for your propagandists services because you are not very good
1
Looking to the caplistist class to solve the climate crisis they caused is laughable.
1
@tjmarx true somethings should go without being said but I find people often need to hear them anyway
1
Previous
17
Next
...
All