Comments by "HunterShows" (@HunterShows) on "Forgotten Weapons" channel.

  1.  @colbunkmust  How can something misleading, if not wrong, be elegant? You didn't even address "alongside" and you ask what I want. Hey, don't reply if you hate to talk.
    1
  2.  @colbunkmust  Fiction isn't wrong, or inaccurate. Your comment is not referring to fiction. It is when you refer to truths with words that conceal truth that we can start to say that the "flow" of the words might need to be reconfigured to better support the meaning of what you are trying to say. There was really no reason to bring fiction up in a question on word accuracy. Anyway, your commitment to considering the matter resolved is impressive, to the extent that you wish to think about it no further to say nothing of revisionist comment editing. And yet you keep replying to me. Hrrrrm.
    1
  3.  @colbunkmust  You are on a public website. Anyone can comment. It doesn't have to meet your opinion of "necessary." Another might say I offered a helpful suggestion. Anyways, so sorry to have intruded on your private discussion of this closed matter. Journalism isn't fiction. If it isn't correct due to "how the words flow" then I'll show you an idiot. Or two, counting the editor. And as far as whether it's resolved, if you can't understand the irony in your insistence on "explaining" yourself to me in a matter that you said has been completely resolved, I'm afraid I can't help you.
    1
  4.  @colbunkmust  ​I got it the whole time. And being right is more important than sounding pretty. And you compared journalism to fiction, no one else. I hope you get it now. In vain.
    1
  5. ​ @colbunkmust  Sorry, you are putting words into my mouth. I said I get how you are choosing to act about the suggestion. Not that I get that my suggestion isn't helpful. That's horseshit. That is your editorialization of a general response of mine. ""And being right is more important than sounding pretty." 'that's not the argument I was making.'" That's because I typed it, not you. ""And you compared journalism to fiction" 'Again, Nope.'" I didn't say you said they were the same. Let's focus on what was said and not manufacture context, if you are able to. I said you compared them in the similarity that they can both be false. And you did. You can own it, or not, but you probably will since you refuse to edit your comments! Hope you understand now.
    1
  6.  @colbunkmust  Again, you are struggling with context. That comment was about you comparing fiction and journalism to writing things accurately. I never said anything about the first person, don't care about him, my comments are their own comments to you, and if you don't wish to read them, stop reading them and complaining about how my nice suggestion is so unnecessary and upsetting to you.
    1
  7.  @colbunkmust  It was a nice suggestion, and you don't know how to take it. And the other commenters meant the same. Now you're following that up with a fit of inappropriate behavior. You clearly enjoy this, so we are going to continue.
    1
  8. Pretty quiet.
    1
  9. It rotates 90 degrees. It only latches on that catch in the safe position. Twist it to fire and the latch is now pointed down and won't catch. Seems like the one great improvement over the MP40.
    1
  10. "Innovating a system that's worse than the current system" That's exactly how they make software today.
    1
  11. You didn't explain why they didn't put the drum on the MP40 and instead made this thing.
    1
  12. Because Google is evil.
    1
  13. Yeah seems like a front cover or a valve like seated cylinder would really have helped a lot of that later junk...
    1
  14. Eh, you're right.
    1
  15. What's wrong with that thing? Needs a stronger spring? Also something to deflect brass lol
    1
  16. It can't be that German if it isn't a toggle lock! Toggle lock sniper rifles. Toggle lock crossbows. Toggle lock flare guns. Toggle lock artillery.
    1
  17. I don't see the point of all the authentic touches if they're going to switch around functionality, to say nothing of semi.
    1
  18. They should have just made a drum and moved it back a little to make it less front heavy.
    1
  19. Hmm, buy a Cobray Terminator, or not? I think...I'll put it off for now.
    1
  20. Well come on, man. This thing isn't going to polish itself!
    1
  21. This must have seemed like alien technology in the mid 1600s. I wonder what they replaced them with.
    1
  22. It's brand new and already forgotten!
    1
  23. This looks like a Chinese mystery pistol without the "BREVETBREVETBREVET" markings everywhere.
    1
  24. I was ready to hear about how "Walam" was some Arabic word like "hawk," inshaallah.
    1
  25. Hmm, no. "Mag" is not a word.
    1
  26. Someone has vandalized this exhibit!
    1
  27. Probably one of the names on the handle...
    1
  28. Um, hello? Did they ever use it? How many were made? What happened? Did it work?
    1
  29. The idea there is not to be cheap. It is to be reliable. Which...
    1
  30. It's amazing, the world's quietest shotgun.
    1
  31. I'm surprised it's not older; only about 10 years before the prototype 1911s.
    1
  32. There are no "price points." Those are called PRICES.
    1
  33. "Anglo" is not a word, unless you're discussing matters pertaining to the Angles.
    1
  34.  @vk2ig  That pertains to the Angles.
    1
  35. Astounding that they sold 100,000 of that - in the 1930s.
    1
  36. No. "Mag" is not a word.
    1
  37. Imagine how you hold this to "aim."
    1
  38. I wonder if the cartridge somehow enables the trigger.
    1
  39. * pew pew pew*
    1
  40. They were the factory and they had to test to know what they were doing. Who knows, perhaps of their various shortages this ammunition wasn't part of it.
    1
  41. Could be, but he was English and the English frequently use odd pronunciations. The name seems French, and clearly the French aren't saying "Lyle."
    1
  42. Titanium might have worked.
    1
  43. I wonder why they didn't make a container to catch them silently.
    1
  44. No mystery here!
    1