Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. The only time when Dima's short video is actually a short video👍
    15
  2.  @hiryu70  There's no doubt about that. The only question is who will be the scapegoat. Imo from what I'm hearing, probably Great Britain. People there seriously need to stay away 300 km away from their military bases. This is serious.
    14
  3. I did not get a notification for this video... Clearly they didn't want this video to be seen...
    14
  4. I agree. I don't know how I would have coped without Dima. There are other reporters but they are not as good as Dima. Even though he makes alot of exaggerations. ( i. e. oh they took this building which means that the whole village will get captured in 24 hours...🤦‍♂ etc.) But he is still the best in terms of an overall reporting on the conflict.
    13
  5. You can't quantify reliably anything else other than territorial gains. So ofcourse it would get and should get the most attention, as it's the only thing you can reliably track.
    13
  6. Dima no offense but it is so funny when you say something "will fall automatically"... not sure why or how you get those ideas from. Ukranian retreat from the eastern part of Avdiivka seems logical, because they have complications holding it there. So it is the most logical step that they might retreat from the eastern part, in order to concentrate their forces in the center of Avdiivka.
    13
  7. or fortunately... Ending this war prematurely i. e. now, is going to be a win for the west ( and ukraine) and a loss for Russia ( and it's allies)... I'm not going to say more...
    13
  8. Thanks Dima, Great analysis as always.
    12
  9. Zelensky was literally at the frontline in Avdivka like 3km away from the front lines. Even tanks and artillery could have taken him, but for some reason stopped shooting when he arrived. Because it's not in the interests of Russia destroying him rn.
    12
  10. Koalitsiya SV is like a mini T14 Armata. It has a 152mm artillery gun and is built on a T90 platform.
    12
  11. Not really. That would be the easiest thing to do, but precisely because Russia doesn't want to do it they are taking almost everything in a fair fight. For example, it would just be easier to erase Bakhmut for Russia , but for obvious reasons Russia doesn't want to do that. Yes, there are parts of the city which are completely destroyed, but just like in Mariupol, if you have at least some buildings, then it's easier to restore the city, than to start from a ground up.
    11
  12. Kinzhal rockets give you a guaranteed hit (impossible to shut down) but it's very expensive, I think like $5 mil. So you would only want to shut down a high priority target. What is a high priority target? an AA system that can shot down your cheap Shahed drones. Simple logic.
    11
  13. Slavic Brothers Should Unite
    11
  14. Honestly it is more likely that they will launch that offensive after the 20th of June. It is not about showing the result, he is being controlled by the Washington directly. So I see it as a general meeting before the offensive.
    11
  15. Well said.👍👍
    11
  16. I mean at this point just take it as your typical daily "required" level of hype. I feel like he thinks that it is required for the video to unnecessarily overpredicting things which turn out to be wrong, but people like that, they like hype like the F16s fighting with Su 75 next year... Which is incredibly hyper optimistic to say the least... so he gives them that. His daily reports are great though, just not the hype stuff.
    11
  17. Lets see... there first one, ended up in losing more territories than they had gained... wondering how's the second one gonna go.
    11
  18. What do you guys mean by collapsing? That is a very strong word for just taking a few fields. Perhaps you wanted to say "Russian advancements are faster than expected".
    10
  19. Same thing, except I am an NZ citizen.
    10
  20.  @Hasan-jf7by  not as much as Avdiivka. Avdiivka is the last town standing on the front lines since 2014 so it would be the most fortified town in Donbass right now. They have strategical defenses in Slovyansk also, and around that area, so that would be difficult too. Overall though the advancements are not as important for Russia, because Russian win solely depends on the western support of Ukraine, and nothing else. Same in Afghanistan, as soon as the US had pulled out, the regime had fell immediately in the same second. Same would happen to Ukraine. So it's better to wait for a political change of presidency in order to negotiate an NWO with a new leader and accept the western capitulation from Ukraine. By which point every other territory would come to Russia automatically. But obviously before that point happens the US wants to inflict the maximum amount of damage to Russia, until the very last moment, when it wouldn't be able to sustain it's debts anymore and would have to secede not just Ukraine but the whole of Europe to Russia. At which point it would only be a matter of time... so those territorial gains don't matter in the grand scheme of things, you can just take 'em with a grain of salt anyway.
    10
  21. Pretty sure Russians allowed them to land on purpose. Since there was nothing of value there. Just wanted to see the hell they were doing lol. Like that was absolutely pointless "operation" that served no purpose other than publicity stunt for Zelensky.
    10
  22. It's very easy to calculate Ukr. KIA losses. On average it is about 500 - 1000 soldiers a day (average of all days of the conflict), so take take the # of days of this military operation ,that would be the upper limit of ukr. losses in thousands, and divide it by 2 , that would be the bottom estimate of ukr. losses, and the actual number is somewhere between those 2 numbers.
    10
  23. As Dima had said it himself it is just a decoy attack to diverge your attention. That's the whole point of this attack.
    10
  24. Thanks Dima.
    10
  25. Honestly I don't think that is even possible to happen.
    10
  26.  @realSanti954  Ukraine could have shot it down with mortars though. That's the point , we really don't know. Either side could have done it be it Russia or Ukraine, either of them. But there's also an opinion online that it could have broken down by itself, because of it's tear and wear and no maintenance and higher than usual water levels. So it could really be anything.
    10
  27. ... why?
    10
  28. Yes, Prigozhin released some info on how many ukr. soldiers his group had liquidated. and it was like 90% of them were from Bakhmut.
    10
  29. 1933 Hitler becomes a dictator. 2023 Zelensky becomes a dictator. Interesting how history always repeats itself...
    10
  30. Perhaps tomorrow Bakhmut will be officially liberated? What do you guys think? There are only a few buildings left as far as I can tell??
    9
  31. Original plan according to the leaked papers was 1st of May , we will see how it goes.
    9
  32. Yes.
    9
  33. Russians are really smart. There 3 main parameters of a fighting vehicle. 1 Armor , 2 speed/ maneuverability, 3 firepower. Balancing those 3 aspects is the goal for any military in the world. And we've literally saw 2 maxed out designed in a span of 2 days. The so called turtle tank ( maximum armor) and now motor brigades ( max speed)... And it works to a great success.
    9
  34. Yeah this feels weird. He should return to his previous format.
    8
  35. 👍👍
    8
  36. They've been fortifying it since 2014 it is currently the most fortified position in the Donbass region, even more so than Bakhmut. But Bakhmut was obviously harder to take as you had to cross the river in the middle and there were less advancements on the left and right flanks... Perhaps it's about equal difficulty, all things considered.
    8
  37. Thanks for the update.
    8
  38. 5:50 to be honest, liberating the last part of Marinka would be hard... that last part looks like a modern castle with a moat.
    8
  39. That was one of the funniest sh. I've ever heard. Ukr. capturing it's own village at the border which had no Russian troops anyway. Just so that they could do a PR stunt hoping that no one would be able to notice. 😂🤦‍♂
    8
  40. I think that it's true that that vehicle didn't do any damage, because it was moving too slowly. One thing that it did though, is demined those trenches. That explosion can eradicated land mines in a 50 meters radius.
    8
  41. 5 mil is the total potential of the whole of Ukraine, But it's not going to happen , may be 1 or 2 at best... and not 5 or 4.
    8
  42. I don't understand why you are saying that it could be last hours of Zelensky? what's so different now aside from slightly higher barrage of missiles than before?
    8
  43. Russia is not our enemy ANZ
    8
  44. They said the same about Bakhmut. In reality it's not the end of the world for both sides. Dima likes to exaggerate things alot. It is however an important strategical point ofcourse and it is the most fortified position for Ukraine on Donbass since 2014, the front line hasn't moved there, and they've been preparing for this for almost 10 years. So losing it would be devastating, however it won't "collapse" the front, or won't change much at the fronts either. It would just stabilize the front lines, and Ukraine will lose it's strategical advantage there.
    8
  45. Thanks Dima as always. The best reporter on the conflict.
    8
  46. Because he is ideal for both sides. Both for Russia and the US he is the perfect puppet, and also a scapegoat at the right moment. To blame the loss on him, just like with Hitler.
    7
  47.  @GreatPolishWingedHussars  SU is Russia. Regardless of how you try to frame it Russia lost the most. America benefitted the most from it "business as usual" but it didn't do it. Russia had won it.
    7
  48. You still need to count the potential of a potential of mobilization, those that fled the country or living in other countries are also a potential of a potential alas most of them ofcourse won't fight for the Ukraine. So the mobilization potential should be counted from 50 mil. ppl. , out of those 11 mil are of the pension age, and say 8 mil or so underage. So around 30 mil people who in theory are capable of fighting , how many people are willing to fight for the Ukraine out of those, hard to tell, but in my opinion no more than 3 - 6 mil. at best. Which is 10% - 20% and no more than that (long to explain). And that is in my opinion is the limit, in reality I think that the total number will actually be around 2 mil. who they can gather to fight on the fields.
    7
  49. @ I wrote a similar message , but it got removed by yt. ffs.
    7
  50. 22:47 the most crucial information of this video. The Russians can put out more than 1k tanks per month. Russian victory is only a matter of time.
    7