Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Defense Politics Asia (DPA)" channel.

  1. If they are doing this, it means that they've got to have some kind of a plan. And I would love to see that plan. i. e. setting the hryvna free you could still control it's exchange rate on the market directly bying the ukranian government bonds. So it might have just added transparency in order to eliminate corruption. That is only if the west doesn't do anything, then the hryvna is obviously going to sink at least 2 or 3 times in it's value... but most likely even more...
    1
  2.  @vanfja  they are doing it already. More tens of billions of dollars going to Ukraine for free, just so that the regime won't collapse and they could continue fighting Russia. it's a proxy war and the US doesn't seem to mind paying for it,
    1
  3. It is the most watched video because he was talking about Prigozhin that's it. Thanks for reviewing his channel though it was interesting.
    1
  4. I think that's a stretch to assume that. But I've given you a like regardless.
    1
  5. Why would that be unlikely. It seems like it could have been done, and why not sell it if somebody wants to buy it? it's already all over black markets, might as well make a quick buck... I have no proofs, but either way, I don't see anything bad in selling them the weapons, so it doesn't matter if they did or not.
    1
  6. It was around 120$ in 2022, so I've got no idea where she got that 161 billion figure from... Has it risen by 40 billion in half a year? I really doubt it.
    1
  7.  @etele8179  You don't get it. In theory may be yes. But that's the point, Ukraine hasn't increased it's production of anything, but even decreased it. Tell me what weapon have they produced recently? It all comes from the west. That's the point!!! So the supposed "growth" comes directly not from it's own production but from the western money injection and increase in salary of the soldiers and training, and maintenance of the army and vehicles itself etc. without the actual increase in the economy production itself. So it's all fictional.
    1
  8.  @thomaslacornette1282  who?
    1
  9. 😄😄👍👍
    1