Comments by "k98killer" (@k98killer) on "Styxhexenhammer666" channel.

  1. ​ @Little.R  "Lucifer" is the Latin word for "morning star" found in the Vulgate. It is technically a translation of the Greek "Phosphoros", itself a translation of the Hebrew "Helel ben Shahar" from Isaiah, which means something like "shining one, son of the morning"; it was an epithet given to the king of Babylon, but Christians interpret it as meaning "Satan" because the verse in question describes Helel ben Shahar as "fallen from heaven". The idea of the "fallen" has also been twisted from its origins: originally, the "fallen" were the honored dead heroes, those who fell in battle. These are the Rephaim from Canaanite mythology, who were described as having feathered wings similar to the description of Christian angels. As chthonic beings, they were also celestial beings, as what is under the Earth during the day is above it during the night, so to become one of the fallen Rephaim was to become elevated to the heavens. In the Hebrew stories they were called the Nephilim, which also means "fallen". However, the Semitic stories painted these beings as evil since they were the great Canaanite heroes who fell in battle fighting off the invading Israelites. How can the Christ and the father of the anti-Christ both have the same moniker? Since Christianity is a confused amalgamation of pagan and Semitic myths, it is not surprising that it would contain such a confusing contradiction. A reasonable apology for this contradiction is that Jesus' spirit descended from heaven when he was incarnated while Satan was cast out of heaven during the rebellion, so in a sense they both fit the description of the "shining one, son of the morning" who fell/descended from heaven, though it is still very strange to describe supposedly opposite beings identically. I recommend the book "Lucifer: Princeps" by Peter Gray for an in-depth exegesis on the topic.
    3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. The evidence from NDEs seems to verify the idea of Baphomet: after death, your mind/soul/life force is drawn toward and dissolves into Baphomet; as life begins, your mind is formed from parts of Baphomet. Reincarnation thus does not guarantee continuity of individuals, though there seem to be ways to bypass the solve et coagula process. There are at least six minds that comprise the human soul, 3 in each brain hemisphere: the exalting/human mind (cerebral cortex, higher level functioning), the normal/mammalian waking consciousness, and the unconscious/reptilian mind. (It would not surprise me if the mind colony included a different mind for every anatomically/ontologically unique part of the brain -- indeed, the ancient Germanic heathens believed in separate aspects of mind each having their own fate after death -- but adding complexity to the model may impede progress toward a good enough result.) We know from empirical observational studies of epilepsy patients who undergo corpus callostomy that each hemisphere can function independently with differing personalities, so the panpsychic, Baphometic concept of natural reincarnation makes a lot of sense. (Are you any more or less "you" if your hemispheres are severed, revealing two distinct minds?) If such a model is correct, then reincarnation with an intact personality could be achieved by two different methods: 1) dissolve into Baphomet with a strong, magickally enforced intent to then entirely recoagulate thereafter, perhaps gaining some insight or power in the process; 2) remain separate from Baphomet (e.g. enter your own purgatory) until a new host body can be acquired. Both would require first finding an adequate harmony in the mind organism, i.e. achieving the gnostic state of the True Will, and I imagine that experience with Baphometic invocations may be instrumental for achieving the first path. However, the goal in such a working should be to further advance experience and development, else the universe may find your unnatural schemes too much to permit.
    2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 1