Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "MeidasTouch" channel.

  1. Immediately will be prosecuted when leaving office? So why was he indicted three years after leaving office, with the trials conveniently scheduled during an election year?
    4
  2.  @robertfoley4522  It is a good call. The general public should not be informed by the ruling class of what they do.
    3
  3. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."
    2
  4. He isn't a narcissist simply because you're obsessed with him. People like you make this completely about him. Just look at the videos posted by this channel. It's all Trump all the time.
    2
  5. Section 5 of the 14th Amendment says... "Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." 18 U.S. Code § 2383 is the appropriate legislation, passed by congress, which enforces Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. He has never been charged or convicted of 18 U.S. Code § 2383.
    2
  6. So you're saying people shouldn't walk up to people in their car while carrying an assault riffle, like Foster did?
    1
  7. Perhaps you should take the time to understand the three branches of government and their responsibilities before you formulate an ignorant opinion and post it on the internet for everyone to see.
    1
  8.  @Sarcasticron  It's a hate crime for a white man to kill a white man? Please, make it make sense.
    1
  9.  @robertcastro1814  Would you like to tell the class what the role of the executive branch is? And would you like to say who is the head of the executive branch for each state?
    1
  10. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."
    1
  11. Because they know the indictments are simply a distraction during an election year, jailing him for such nonsense won't end well in the long run. Every prosecutor knows they can't get a unanimous decision from a jury, even in the bluest of districts. Jurors are selected from voting registrations. Biden didn't win any district by 100%.
    1
  12. So the Obama and Biden appointed Justices are bought? The decision was 9-0.
    1
  13. We are not preserving, protecting or defending Ukraine, but we sure are supporting them.
    1
  14.  @DJ_Black_Tourmaline  But... 1x1 does equal 1÷1
    1
  15. Yes, the president is the government... Presidential powers belong to the Office of the President, they don't belong to the individual. That's why we are not a monarch. Rather than be "gobsmacked", you should probably take a civics class.
    1
  16. Why is Trump in the thumbnail for this video? You understand this channel is just rage bait... right?
    1
  17. So it's racist for a white man to kill a white man? Please, make it make sense.
    1
  18. A militia regulated by a government is a military. Even in today's terms, it just means a self-regulated militia.
    1
  19.  @70sAirForceBrat  The National Guard is the military, not a militia. They take the same oath, go through the same basic training, and receive a military ID. Try again.
    1
  20.  @70sAirForceBrat  Great, thank you for the historical lesson in how the National Guards are now the military and not a militia. I'm glad you can prove me right.
    1
  21. So he bought off the Obama and Biden appointed Justices to get the 9-0 decision? If what you're saying is true, why did Obama and Biden appoint such corrupt Justices?
    1
  22. The Constitutional Oath referenced in the 14th is not the same as the Presidential Oath. I know this is complicated for you to understand, but these are two different oaths with different words in them.
    1
  23. It's a hate crime for a white man to kill a white man? Please, make it make sense.
    1
  24.  @maryRIL-yj4dk  So medical complications means we should just end a human life?
    1
  25.  @SidneytheDog  Well... There is already an exemption in place in Texas for when the mother's life is at risk. So clearly the issue is it being illegal when the mother's life is not at risk. So is a non life threatening medical complication a reason to end a human life?
    1
  26.  @maryRIL-yj4dk  So you mean for the mother's life to be at risk... She has to be dying. LMAO. Yes, that's how fatal complications work. Keep trying to justify the needless ending of human life.
    1
  27.  @maryRIL-yj4dk  Fact is, the exemptions exist and you are still upset. Stop trying to use the mother's life as an excuse to end human life. Stop pretending like you don't want this to be an on demand service, regardless of the state of the mother's life. And, I have a feeling all 18 women in your interview from a biased source also want this to be an on demand service.
    1
  28.  @maryRIL-yj4dk  Repeating yourself doesn't change the fact you are hiding behind mortality to justify an on demand service. See how you didn't say I was wrong when I said you support that? It's because you do. Stop trying to use the mother's life as an excuse to end a human life on demand.
    1
  29. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."
    1
  30.  @daveseddon5227  Every politician says their constituents need to "fight"... Did you not watch the impeachment hearings, where a montage of Democrats saying the same thing was played? Of course you didn't watch it. You clearly enjoy remaining uninformed.
    1
  31.  @daveseddon5227  So you agree Trump used the word "fight" metaphorically, and the dumb dumbs at the capitol interpreted it incorrectly like the dumb dumbs they are... That's not inciting an insurrection. It's kind of wild the mental gymnastics people will go through to justify subverting democracy by removing Trump from ballots and imprisoning him before the election.
    1
  32.  @ourkeving  And what was that reaction? Acknowledgment of reality?
    1
  33. Removing a candidate from a ballot without due process isn't very democratic...
    1
  34. Oh, so when was Obama and Bush indicted for their war crimes? Or do they have immunity?
    1
  35.  @leeselset5751  You're right. You didn't click on this video about Trump. You didn't take time to comment on this video about Trump. So you must not be obsessed.
    1
  36.  @leeselset5751  Because people like you and the red hat people bring so much entertainment to the internet.
    1
  37. It's not self executing... Section 1 of the 14th requires due process to abridge a privilege of citizenship such as holding office. The due process for the 14th Amendment is detailed in Section 5 of the 14th, where congress shall enforce the provisions of the amendment. The 18 U.S. Code § 2383 was a law passed by congress which enforces Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, including not holding office. According to the 5th and 6th Amendments of the constitution, for this law to be applicable, a jury must charge and convict.
    1
  38. What does Section 1.3 of the 14th Amendment say about due process, given that holding office is a privilege of citizenship?
    1
  39. They might... if he also walks up to someone in their car while carrying an assault riffle.
    1
  40. So the Obama and Biden Justices are corrupt too? The decision was 9-0... Maybe you're just on the wrong side of this one.
    1
  41. A hate crime for a white man killing a white man? Please, make it make sense.
    1
  42. Trump didn't take the Constitutional Oath, he took the Presidential Oath. I know this is difficult for you to understand, but soldiers are not the President and do not take the Presidential Oath.
    1
  43. Weird. I only see one party removing people from ballots.
    1
  44. What does Section 1.3 of the 14th Amendment say about due process, given that holding office is a privilege of citizenship?
    1
  45. The scripture of that document says... Section 1 of the 14th requires due process to abridge a privilege of citizenship such as holding office. The due process for the 14th Amendment is detailed in Section 5 of the 14th, where congress shall enforce the provisions of the amendment. The 18 U.S. Code § 2383 was a law passed by congress which enforces Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, including not holding office. According to the 5th and 6th Amendments of the constitution, for this law to be applicable, a jury must charge and convict.
    1
  46. You do understand that the decision was 9-0... right?
    1
  47. Imagine being so desperate to retain power, that you try removing the leading opponent from ballots and attempt to imprison him before the election.
    1
  48.  @robertfoley4522  You mean the way they are taking Trump's responsibility out of context?
    1
  49.  @robertfoley4522  I'm aware of what the asinine comment says. Do you think nothing was actually done during his presidential term, only tweets?
    1
  50.  @vickirich  Democrats sure complained a lot about the legislation he was passing for "that's pretty much all he ever did"...
    1