Comments by "Tamarlane " (@Tamarlane389) on "LBC" channel.

  1.  @The_History_Simp not true but please continue down this road by all means.
    4
  2. Under article 251 of the UN charter, the Iranian response was perfectly legal.
    4
  3.  @jamespaul6315  yeah yeah. Hasbara troll
    4
  4.  @sabine1470 that every un resolution re the illegal settlements was ignored? That’s common knowledge
    4
  5. @GretsGarbokilling the chief negotiator is a clear sign of intentione regarding ‘negotiation’.
    4
  6.  @jeffsimon9594 just make one call like you did against sangita
    4
  7.  @weswheel4834 we should remember that 18 military targets were attacked on that day
    4
  8.  @aigoaizporietis9275 which part of the law do you think doesn’t apply to YOU?
    4
  9. Yes. They should guard them and give them safe passage. Sadly that takes morality and courage, the only two things Israel can’t demand from the US
    3
  10. Claudine is a shining example of why we should ban dual nationality. You’re either 100% committed or you’re not. These people treated passports like Tinder
    3
  11.  @victoriakn7480 let’s see how they loyalty handles the inevitable tests that it will soon face
    3
  12.  @mongmanification In principle you are right. But practically speaking you are not. Firstly their empire was more local and smaller than Britain’s. This meant they earned way less wealth and killed fewer people. Secondly, they didn’t cause anywhere near as much damage to nations around the world as Britain did (including using afghanistan as a buffer state to Russia, changing afghan kings and launching wars on whims). When it comes to destructive empires, Britain tops the charts.
    3
  13.  @adgepeterb why does that matter?
    3
  14.  @johndoe-vc1we no it isn’t
    3
  15.  @lunatigannie8860  yeah alright Superman 😂
    3
  16. This is precisely why he wasn’t successful. People are mostly unable to comprehend him and only seem to respond to short, catchy slogans. This is the level this country has now reached.
    3
  17.  @TheAshube9 is that why it issued a warning in advance? 😂😂
    3
  18.  @nataliaustinovich8802  No charge, no trial, no conviction = NOT a prisoner. A hostage.
    3
  19.  @cashkitty3472 that never happened anywhere buddy. No proof of is. So try again
    3
  20.  @captainchaoscow your comment is too broad. Supporting this offensive is illegal under international law.
    3
  21. We do train our own. The vast majority are our own. I think James’s comment was in the context of ONLY train our own and have no overseas staff.
    3
  22. Germany has been Israel’s second biggest backer. And if it wasn’t for Germany, there would be no israel. Germany is hugely responsible here
    3
  23.  @fredmercury1314 it’s proven false so yes it’s hate speech and is therefore criminalised.
    3
  24. And?
    3
  25. Following the road of Islamophobia will make an atheist ‘Culturally Christian’ 😂. Let that be a lesson to those of a logical mind.
    3
  26.  @shakole5979 if yoo don’t find you never lose. Yes true
    3
  27.  @schematiks patriotic alternative, Britain first, EDL, the Judean People’s front
    3
  28.  @garyfletcher1910 it’s quite hard to work out who you dislike? Khan? The entire city of London? Democracy? Pick a hate lane dude
    3
  29.  @salfordtruthcabal3945 you’re from Salford, I’d reign it in mate 😂
    3
  30.  @gospelgoodnews4859 the difference is the lives of 1000 Israeli citizens and 200 plus hostages
    3
  31.  @The_Phoenix_Saga if they stayed and fought for their land, they be the rightful owners. Running away means you concede it. Forever.
    3
  32.  @sopronunciareglignocchi7255 hang on. Why did you attack the mosque?
    3
  33. Ask Huw Edwards
    3
  34. Prove it
    3
  35. 5:19 caught in a lie
    3
  36.  @OrenJury as opposed to a Muslim that’s not an active jihadist. Believers are either devout / observant or not. He knew what he said and so do we
    3
  37.  @WalterKhayyam  He would say ‘devout’ or ‘observant’. He is articulate. A master of words. He said ‘active’ as a nod to his own crowd - as in active combatant, active agent, active enemy, active Islamist. It’s a carefully chosen word to stoke up fear and yet avoid responsibility. It’s so clever, you’re still buying it
    3
  38.  @jamespaul6315 a war crime is a war crime is a war crime. Get it now champ?
    3
  39.  @daleyoung4710 you have the right to lay down your lives for the illegal rogue colonial state. Enjoy :)
    3
  40.  @megaham1552 can ONLY get that through resistance
    3
  41.  @jaredshipp9207 where does the needle point fit ethic cleansing on your compass? South?
    3
  42.  @georgefrancis8602 apart from you, nothing is irrelevant. The 80-year occupation is the most relevant and oppressed people have the legal right to defence
    3
  43.  @michaelg1279  take your caps lock off and try that again.
    3
  44. I live in a deeply Jewish area where the vast majority are Jewish. No problems at all 😎
    3
  45. @@TOM-TOM-TOM ‘Factual’? Another word you don’t know then? No Source? Liar troll.
    3
  46.  @DavidJohnson-yg8qm cause it would be true
    3
  47.  @wavydavy9816  not a problem. Actually, these factors are not that well known among the average white Briton, save for academics. It’s always important to know what motivates people. I hope that now gives some idea of why these hatemongers do what they do. To be clear, it’s not so much about religion, more about punching down, the politicization of religion, selfishness and a long history of survivalist thinking among certain sections of the Indian community. I recommend ‘The Anarchy’ by William Dalrymple for more.
    3
  48. Not racism as found by court. Keep up
    3
  49. One obvious difference is that Ukraine has been invaded by a foreign state. Therefore all men of fighting age will fight just like in Afghanistan in ‘79. However Afghanistan has now fallen in to internal strife as a direct consequence of western intervention. When it’s internal strife, you don’t always know who the enemy is and sides are changed often. You may be reported to the Taliban due to a grudge with someone. It’s way more complex than Ukraine in that regard. Any man is potentially a target. Afghanistan is also infiltrated by ISIS too and this has further destabilised the country. Also, Ukrainians are given much safer passage to the west. I don’t know many women or children that could make that perilous journey from Afghanistan. When you think about it, it’s incredibly obvious why the women and children don’t come and why only a young, fit man could. If anything, the west has more more moral obligation to Afghanistan than it does to Ukraine. The Ukrainians are not in their position due to the west, the Afghans are. I also think the host is right, as many have pointed out before - there’s more sympathy for those that are more like you.
    3
  50. The truth must be invisible then as not a single person has produced a shred of evidence to support these laughably discriminatory claims.
    3