Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Anders Puck Nielsen"
channel.
-
There were literally never any lines of volunteers to join Ukrainian military, Puck is lying to his audience again. Also, Ukraine does NOT have around 40 million people, as millions fled the country. And funny enough, most of them fled to Russia. But Puckie won't talk about that, because that doesn't fit his false narrative. Russia is not doing another round of mobilisation, because they have a steady stream of volunteers, that's another thing Puck will never mention. Concerning the Ukrainian losses, project Wartears estimates Ukrainians KIA to almost 280k, which seems to be about right. Also, Russians still hold around 12k Ukrainian POWs. To sum it up, Puck again exhibits a severe incompetence, ignorance and dishonesty. Pitiful.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Another show of utter incompetence. Mr. Nielsen somehow forgot to mention, that Ukraine used a humanitarian corridor for the attack and the ships attacked were involved in maintaining that corridor. Also, Mr. Nielsen clearly lies about how "Russia decided to withdraw from the grain deal", as that never happened. Russia simply put it on pause and demanded investigation and security assurances, that it will not happen again. They reportedly recieved those assurances and simply continued with the deal. Then this guy tries to spin the purpose of the grain deal, saying that the export was supposed to lower prices on a global market, but everyone who has a working memory remembers, that the main argument for the corridor was very clearly export to the third world countries. Then he repeats the lie about Russia withdrawing from the deal, which never happened. And as usual he then starts babbling incoherently about Russia not being able to control the situation and some non existent Turkish warships, when the fact is, that Russia effectively blocked Ukrainian ports before the deal and could easily do it again. And to top it off, he pulls out a completely false information about Russia recieving "some written promises" from Ukraine, when everyone knows NOBODY discusses ANYTHING with Ukraine, all the deals are discussed betweeen Russia and USA/UK with Turkey as a middle man. This shows two things: 1. This man is either utterly incompetent and doesn't know what he's talking about, or 2. He deliberately lies and pushes a false narrative. Either way, it's terrible.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@wai828 Looks like YT is blocking my response for some reason, so I"ll try again. It is in fact your argument,, that winning/losing is based on territory taken/lost. Here's a quote: "They took in a month more territory than Russia did since the start of their focus in the East, it's ridiculous to believe any of this is a failure." I simply asked how is taking territory relevant to winning/losing and presented an example to show, how ridiculous it is to measure it just by territory taken. But you are obviously not able to comprehend it in the slightest, so I will kindly help you with that. If you take a territory, which contains an active defending force, by destroying or capturing that force, it means you are winning. Like Russians did in Mariupol for example. Remember those several thousands marines and Az-vites they destroyed/captured there? That is what you can call a win. But if you take a territory, from which the enemy forces have retreated, that means jack sh!t, because the enemy army is still able to fight and take that territory back. Like for example in Kharkov region. Do you understand this very basic and very simple rule? I hope so, because I can't explain it any simpler.
2
-
@wai828 Part2: And to help you further, I will try to write in much simpler terms the thing about opinion. Ready? Maybe shake your head a few times to wake up the brain. Ready? Here it goes. It is my opinion, that this guy, as well as you, does not know what is happening and this opinion is based on the factual information, that I presented and further explained in subsequent post. Is that mush in your head getting it now? As to the factuality of my statements, it is based on the sum of reports of many news channels, analytical maps, official reports, war correspondent reports and actual videos from the front lines. And you in fact presented nothing at all, that would contradict those statements. You simply wrote your opinion based on basically nothing. So take the L and shut it.
2
-
@wai828 Well, you can count that as a symbolic victory, but the rest of what you just wrote is a complete BS. Ukrainians did not shorten the front, they actually expanded it and they lenghtened their supply routes, one look even at the map presented in this video confirms it beyond any doubt. Concerning casualties, Ukraine suffered about 5-10 times more losses than Russia, that's what even western sources say and many experts confirm that. The only one who says otherwise is Ukraine. Russians fought against advantage in manpower right from the start, their contingent of roughly 150k faced about 500k (or more after mobilization) of Ukrainian and mercenary forces. Russian reputation is damaged only in the eyes of blind people, who believe Ukraine ever stood a chance of winning the war. Same with the morale issues, it's not Russian soldiers releasing literally HUNDREDS of desperate pleas to their government, complaining about them being used as a cannon fodder and thrown to the front lines without any support. In the last few of such pleas Ukrainian soldiers even complained about being given orders to kill everyone in towns they enter, or being ordered to finish their own wounded comrades. Your view of both Russians and Ukrainians is completely false, whether by ignorance, or by design.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2