Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @zapa1pnt  No it couldn't.
    2
  2.  @zapa1pnt  But now you are and you started with personal attack. Well done.
    2
  3. @karldubhe8619 According to who?
    2
  4.  @johnridout6540  What is even your point? And what are the claims? Be more specific.
    2
  5. I like how Puck makes it clear in the first minute, that he's just providing copium for the hungry horde of desperate Ukrofans. The so called Ukrainian offensive has been a terrible disaster, calling it anything else is just ridiculous. Ukraine lost around 20k soldiers and a quarter of all the western equipment just in the last month. The territorial gains are miniscule and even some western sources started admitting, that it's not sustainable. Puck also doesn't talk about Russian artillery advantage of 10:1, he just mentions how Ukraine supresses Russian artillery, without ever mentioning, that the supression is going on both sides. Lancets won't cease to exist just because this incompetent caricature of military expert doesn't talk about them. And Bakhmut has been a PR disaster for Ukraine, not Russia, because it was Zelensky and other Kiev regime criminals, who said they will never give up Bakhmut. To sum it up, this video is again just a show of incompetence and wishful thinking. Classic Puck.
    2
  6.  @stevendeamon  You basically admitted that Ukrainians are dying for the US interests.
    2
  7.  @mariaf.6601  Absolute lack of arguments on your side. 😂
    2
  8. Stopped and destroyed? You talking about your brain apparently.
    2
  9. A sound insight into his ignorance maybe. He is obviously just another Ukrofan.
    2
  10. Puck will explain...oh wait, he won't. 😆
    2
  11.  @mariaf.6601  You wouldn't ask such ridiculous questions if you had a brain. Go get one and all will become clear.
    2
  12. Budapest memorandum was broken by the US in 2014. Sorry to burst your bubble.
    2
  13.  @thewingedringer  So NATO financed it, trained the soldiers, equipped them fully, but it has nothing to do with NATO? Seriously?
    2
  14. The facts you presented surely made a lot of Ukrobots cry. Good job.
    2
  15. "Ukrainians are gaining terrain" - What little ground they they gained is already being retaken by Russians. "maybe there could be a kind of Russian collapse" - Been hearing this BS for a few months, it's not happening any time soon. "Ukraine offensive has not reached culmination" - After using all their strategical reserves the offensive still did not culminate? Yea, sure. "it is because of the weather" - The offensive has stalled already, it's definitely not because of the weather. "Putin decided...no mobilisation" - Puck completely omits the fact, that in Russia hundreds of thousands volunteered to serve, it has been widely reported. Does Puck not know about this? "Putin still not confident in the support of the Russian people" - Puck is obviously completely divorced from reality. "you will not get home before the war is over" - That is just a bold faced lie. "Ukraine still has more to push with" - More foot soldiers to send to their death with no support. Also note, that when Puck shows the map, he doesn't zoom in to actually show the Ukrainian gains and instead draws arrows, which are in fact much larger than the territory gained. In summation, Puck once again shows his incompetence and dishonesty, the levels of cope in this video are trough the roof!
    2
  16.  @Soupertrouper  Great argument, I especially like how you did not adress a single point I made. Bravo!
    2
  17.  @frank-r5j8z  In reality, Russia gained more ground than Ukraine this year, even The New York Times admitted it. Have another Copecola and chill.
    2
  18.  @PalleRasmussen  You quoted a nonexistent statements from Prigozhin. That is called lying.
    2
  19. You can think anything you want, that doesn't make it real.
    2
  20.  @HeadsFullOfEyeballs  So because your name is HeadsFullOfEyeballs, you are pretending to have head full of eyeballs? Are you even serious? And anyone who can read body language will basically confirm Puck is not being honest, it's clear as a day he's forcing himself to push this ridiculous narrative which not even he himslef believes.
    2
  21.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  Will you pay him like Puck gets paid?
    2
  22. Yes, yes, go back to your echo chamber.
    2
  23.  @mariaf.6601  Where is your " "argumentation"? Don't forget to write your usual comment about how many views the video has, that's the height of your capabilities.
    2
  24. The US propped regime must go anyway, so what's the problem?
    2
  25. By the power of wishful thinking. Go watch some Mickey Mouse.
    2
  26.  @toby9999  Informed by western media? Don't be ridiculous.
    2
  27.  @bc-guy852  Appeal to authority, argument rejected. Try harder.
    2
  28.  @rmdomainer9042  You know what the word "evidence" means, don't you?
    2
  29. lol
    2
  30. Russia - people actually get to vote for the head of their state. Denmark - the head of the state simply inherits the title, no elections whatsoever.
    2
  31. This is hilarious, Puck still thinks his nonsensical rant about Wagner stands, even tho nothing of what he said had anything to do with the reality of things. And now he farted out another fantasy story about Wagner and again, it's completely divorced from reality. He also keeps pretending, that Russia is an autocracy and that Ukraine offensive is a success.This is not just incompetence, this is some serious psychological issue. Or maybe drug abuse, in this video Puck looks genuinely high, almost maniacal. Just stop it, get some help.
    2
  32.  @worfoz  Who is we and how do you know what losses Russia suffered?
    2
  33.  @evgeniya7853  What about the US?
    2
  34. You made NAFO minions mad, that means you are right.
    2
  35.  @freedomfighter22222  Go read Syrsky's latest interview, then come back to apologize.
    2
  36. You can see the desperation in Puck's eyes, as the only thing that didn't work was the pitiful attempt to blame IS for the attack to cover Ukruine's involvement. IS was never even mentioned by the terrorists or by Russian investigators. The decision making centers in Ukruine were already hit with Zircon missiles in response and a terrorist camp in Turkey was raided by local authorities, presumably based on information gained from the terrorists themselves. It's over Puck, too late for damage control.
    2
  37.  @ghydda  Very persuasive argument, classic case of pure denial. Move along.
    2
  38.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  No, I just watch news and know what happened in the last 24 hours. Unlike you apparently.
    2
  39.  @anglaismoyen  I'm sure you can provide a direct quote of Putin, right? I mean, you wouldn't lie so stupidly, would you?
    2
  40. It is hardly objective, as Puck is very clearly biased as hell, don't be ridiculous.
    1
  41.  @janvisagie231  The brain power is weak in this one.
    1
  42.  @janvisagie231  I don't see you challenging those "senseless comments" with any reasonable arguments, so there is obviously no point communicating with you any further.
    1
  43.  @gandalfstormcrow8439  What does a map have to do with the subject of Puck's clear bias?
    1
  44.  @kyleramsey5189  I wrote a comment about the "analysis", in this thread I'm reacting to a comment, which talks about the authors alleged objective view. Didn't you notice? And Puck is clearly biased in favor of Ukraine, didn't you notice that too?
    1
  45. He explains Russian propaganda by using western propaganda. Get a brain.
    1
  46. It's Youtube doing it, because Ukrobots downvote your comments.
    1
  47.  @mariaf.6601  It would actually. And I'm quite sure you don't think much at all.
    1
  48.  @thomastoadie9006  It's Vexler that has nothing to show. Even the quote presented here is pathetic and nonsensical. That is Vexler's usual level.
    1
  49.  @andersjjensen  By those standards Vexler is a bot. Hilarious.
    1
  50.  @andersjjensen  Did you miss the quote that started this thread? And if you want an argument, you should ask nicely and not call people bots for expressing their opinion. Is this how you usually operate? Because it's despicable and it's not how decent people act.
    1