Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. You mean the one clip with a golf car NAFOids use as a talking point at every opportunity?
    8
  2. If only the western press haven't already admitted that Russia is producing more than they lose in Ukraine, that would make this video not so hilariously irrelevant. But hey, let's just hope Ukraine can last long enough for Russia to run out of everything, right? Peak cope, top entertainment.
    7
  3.  @Pikkabuu  "Russia has lost around 10000 tanks in almost three years" - Right there.
    7
  4. Meanwhile Ukrainian companies are complaining that recruiters are stealing their workers despite the company employees having official protection from mobilization. Motivation indeed!
    5
  5.  @aruunmenon  His target audience is definitely not the people who want to hear balanced information.
    5
  6. The cope intensifies and it's hilarious. Just don't ever talk about Ukraine, it's too hard to spin that disaster, right?
    4
  7.  @uniformmike05  Russia had to increase maximum size of the army to make room for all the volunteers. Sorry to burst your bubble, Bubba.
    4
  8.  @jehandesains8674  Evidence not presented, argument dismissed. Bye.
    4
  9.  @VuldEdone  "Ukraine is estimated to have as many tanks now as it started with, through captures and donations. " - That's a good one, mind if I borrow it and share it with friends for a good laugh?
    4
  10.  @Pikkabuu  You are funny, the jokes you tell are so ridiculous it's actually hilarious.
    4
  11. At no point did author present any evidence of how many pieces are in use. The amount of pieces taken from long term storage tells us nothing more than how many pieces have been moved. Crisis indeed.This channel is a joke.
    4
  12.  @James-9999  Can you be any more irrelevant?
    4
  13. So to summarize - Ukraine has zero stockpiles, Russia still has huge ones. Who would have guessed, right?
    3
  14.  @infinitelyexplosive4131  That's only true for equally strong opponents. Does not apply here.
    3
  15. There is nothing to count.
    3
  16. This channel should be called Cope Cabal. Ukraine - ZERO RESERVES OF ANYTHING. Russia- thousands of everything.
    3
  17. One Russian SPG is equivalent of one NATO SPG. Saying otherwise would require quite some evidence, yet you presented none. Argument dismissed.
    3
  18.  @ZuulGatekeeper  You must have been farting with excitement while writing this deranged drivel.
    3
  19.  @Statueshop297  The trends according to Oryx are that UA is destroying several times more of every kind of equipment. The situation on the ground however completely opposes these "trends". Start explaining, I'll make some popcorn.
    3
  20.  @Statueshop297  "It’s throwing loads of stuff at Ukraine so it’s losing loads." - Russia is throwing loads of glide bombs and missiles at Ukraine, how does that reflect in the amount of losses? It's current Russian tactic to just bomb every defensive position to nothing before moving in. You still failed to explain how it's possible for Ukraine to cause several times higher losses in every kind of equipment. Remember, you did not dispute Ukraine is outgunned. I'm all ears.
    3
  21. And if you look at Ukraine, you can see they have no such storages. They are done.
    3
  22. Let's not talk about how badly Ukroreich is losing, let's talk about how Russia is running out of stuff.
    3
  23. The storage cope is still going? Hilarious. Utterly hilarious.
    3
  24. Oh my, another cope channel. Russia this, Russia that, none of it ever came true, but the audience doesn't mind, they just want to feel good.
    3
  25. I wonder who's dropping those hundred FABs a day then.
    2
  26.  @uniformmike05  We are talking about manpower here, did you miss the word "volunteers"? You claimed Russia has to recruit 30k just to cover losses, yet they had to increase maximum size of the army by a few hundred thousand. That means either they are recruiting far more than 30k which is unrealistic, or they don't have such high losses. Pick one.
    2
  27.  @uniformmike05  I said pick one, you can't have both. It's painfully obvious, that the Russian losses are far smaller than the western propaganda assumes. And I don't see you presenting any evidence for it either. Quite a weak argument.
    2
  28. Meanwhile Ukrainians are using civilian mini tractors with attached flatbeds made for pig transport.
    2
  29. The fact, that you were so quick to mention those "destroyed Russian depots" and completely ommited all the captured Ukrainian depots, clearly shows your bias. Too bad, I kinda liked the rest.
    2
  30. So it's the usual "storage depleting" cope? Not even worth watching.
    2
  31.  @jehandesains8674  "Russia Producing More Weapons Than Needed in Ukraine" - The Defense Post, 26.4.2024. Well, you owe me an apology.
    2
  32.  @richardbennett8522  Hello Ruzzi bot(whatever that means), are you mad?
    2
  33.  @isaacparks968  Seems pretty clear to me, the problem must be on your side.
    2
  34.  @Statueshop297  But we are not talking about where do I get any numbers, kindly adress the point I made. Which is, just to clarify, that the situation on the ground is not compatible with Oryx numbers. If one side is taking several times greater losses on average, there is no way that side is still in full combat readiness and making progress. Do I make myself clear enough, or do you still need further clarification?
    2
  35.  @Statueshop297  So Russia vastly outnumbers and outguns Ukraine, yet they are somehow taking several times more losses. And you are unable to explain how this is even possible. Simple "they use more, they lose more" does not cut it at all.
    2
  36.  @alfisti93  Nope, the grim reality goes like this: After a defensive position is spotted, a method of neutralizing it is selected ranging from simple FPV drones up to heavy aerial bombs and ballistic missiles.Only after the position is sufficiently suppressed the infantry moves in. The attacks you describe are quite rare nowadays and has been since UA army demostrated more than sufficiently how it doesn't work last summer. I know. Really. (Regardless of how much the position is fortified, Russia has a range of weapons which turn such position into a mass grave for UA soldiers...)
    2
  37.  @alfisti93  But I just explained why it's taking so long. Pay more attention. It's slow, because Russia bombs defensive positions to dust before moving in. Using such tactic takes more time, but ensures low losses on Russian side. And who is we? The evidence I can see every day is UA army being atomized with FABs and Iskanders by even a whole trainfulls. Artillery fire from UA side happens sporadically, if ever, in number of drones Russia easily outmatches UA. Have a Lancet on the way out. Reality checked indeed.
    2
  38. The title should be "Coping with Russia's inevitable victory part 85".
    2
  39. Can Ukraine strike some old unused tanks in Russia? Sure they can, but why would they do such idiotic thing? I understand you need to cope somehow, but this is too much.
    2
  40. Too bad noone takes ISW seriously.
    2
  41.  @cynderfan2233  Irrelevant, dismissed.
    2
  42.  @Grouuumpf  And even that vague prediction is completely false and based purely on speculation.
    2
  43. Let's just not talk about Ukraine and how they are losing badly, let's instead fabricate some feel-good news as bias confirmation for the horde of NAFOids.
    2
  44.  @brokenmirror715  That's by far not even one to every video. Your logic is flawed, just like in these videos. Maybe that's why you watch them?
    2
  45.  @ChucksSEADnDEAD  What did?
    2
  46.  @sababugs1125  Hey, I can throw random numbers at you too, there is infinite supply of such claims.
    2
  47. Relevant how?
    1
  48. This video is not addressing the number of destroyed vehicles at all. Your comment is completely irrelevant.
    1
  49. @kiereluurs1243 Sorry, I do not speak your braindead language.
    1
  50.  @iQKyyR3K  Because it always is.
    1