Comments by "" (@Princip666) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1.  @iQKyyR3K  This channel predicted Russia could run out of artillery shells in 2023 yet here we are.
    1
  2.  @jehandesains8674  I like how every time one of you guys mentions the difference in shells fired the numbers are completely different, it's quite hilarious. True, it was concerning old stockpiles and not counting with current production rate, but there is zero evidence that the stockpiles are already gone. Imported shells are just to ensure a solid reserve. It's not Russia firing one or two shells a day for every kilometer of the front, it's Ukraine.
    1
  3. lol NAFO wet dreams
    1
  4.  @EngineerMFB  I watch dozens of videos every day of Russia doing exactly that. Weird, right?
    1
  5.  @scatterlite2266  You know what hyperbole is, right?
    1
  6.  @scatterlite2266  Where does he talk specifically about this channel? Are you even serious? Maybe go outside, get some fresh air so your brain starts working a little better.
    1
  7.  @scatterlite2266  "Where does he talk specifically about this channel?" - Oh, did you miss that part? Then get back to it, sidetracking doesn't work on me.
    1
  8. Month later, no sing of them running low on anything.😂
    1
  9. Hey, this one is funny 🤣 thank you.
    1
  10.  @markhugo8270  Yea, but you would have to send pilots too, as Ukrainians only know how to fly the Russian planes🤣 and none of the US heroes dares to set foot in Ukraine officially. Those who did so unofficially, lie dead and burned beyond recognition in Mariupol ruins.
    1
  11. This video is one big nothing burger. Waste of time.
    1
  12.  @jehandesains8674  In other words, you are too dishonest to admit you were wrong. Facts? Prove? Where is the evidence? Don't be silly.
    1
  13. I'm pretty sure they don't even know such person exists. If they knew, they would just laugh.
    1
  14. "against only Ukraine" - Fully paid and armed by the whole NATO. And NATO still losing badly.
    1
  15.  @jehandesains8674  Who is we? All I heard from western press is how Ukraine is winning.
    1
  16.  @shaun7142  Maybe you should ask the channel owner to do the same video for Ukraine. All we hear is Russia this, Russia that, it's all just a distraction from the terrible state of the UA army.
    1
  17.  @shaun7142  Well, since the only evidence presented in this video shows only how many vehicles was removed from long term storage, I of course agree that that's the number of vehicles removed from long term storage. The rest of the video is just copium sauce.
    1
  18.  @shaun7142  Oh, I'll need a quote of me saying "they aren't being used in Ukraine". Chop chop, do not bother me with anything until you provide it.
    1
  19.  @shaun7142  You are not paying attention, maybe that's why you decided to lie. Shame.
    1
  20.  @shaun7142  The principal argument of this video(just like most of the videos about Russia on this channel) is quite obviously the "Russia running out of something some time in the near future" narrative, portraying the situation as bad for Russia. Nobody except Russian high command has any idea how many MT-LBs(or any other piece of equipment for that matter) are in service and how many has been lost, Oryx numbers are bogus. Why? Because for example Ukraine had over 2k MT-LBs initially, Oryx claims they lost only over a hundred, yet UAF was not seen using any of them for quite some time. Where are the 2k Ukrainian MT-LBs? Why doesn't the author ask such a question? If the author was unbiased and honest, he would outright say Russia won't run out of anything any time soon and wouldn't use Oryx as a source of anything else than pure propaganda. But that would cost him his current audience, wouldn't it?
    1
  21.  @shaun7142  So, where are the 2k of Ukrainian MT-LBs? Not very skillful evasion tbh. You get no points for that. And the thumbnail text clearly states "Soon to be extinct: MT-LB", making my claim demonstrably true. Zero points here too. And no, my point is NOT that Oryx is incomplete, another lie doesn't make your argument more credible. Minus one point here. Oryx is propaganda not "Because it shows Russia in a bad light", but because it knowingly presents false information, as is the case with MT-LB. Again, my claim is demonstrably true. Your final score is negative one point.
    1
  22.  @shaun7142  So the statement(not a question) "Soon to be extinct: MT-LB", which perfectly fits into the category of "Russia running out of something some time in the near future", is by your own admission at the very least highly misleading, as the only evidence presented is for the number of vehicles removed from long term storage. The word "extinct" means no longer in existence, not no longer in long term storage, even in the context of the actual video title it's completely false. Words have meaning, you see? So the statement is literally "Soon to be no longer in existence", which can't be more obviously false. It doesn't say "Soon to be completely cleared from long term storage", to say it was used out of context by me is not even funny. What is funny however is how you try to disguise blatantly false information as incomplete information. Anyway, it is in fact used by the author as a credible source and surprise surprise, he argues that the real number of Russian losses should be higher to fit his narrative. By your own admission you have no idea where 2k of armored vehicles went, but because AFU are clearly no longer using them, it's safe to assume they've been lost, or even misreported as Russian losses. You don't get such a margin of error by honest mistake, or incomplete data, you only get it by manipulating the data. I know it's hard for a NAFO pawn to admit such things, so I understand your desperate attempts. I even almost feel sorry for you.
    1
  23.  @shaun7142  "Not really, because Russia has other vehicle" - Irrelevant. "I see. So you're claiming that every single vehicle destroyed in Ukraine is accounted for on Oryx:" - Another bold faced lie. "Or, a picture wasn't taken of them since" -Laughable, you can't hide 2k armored vehicles. So basically your whole argument is childish denial and lying. I was hoping for something better, that's why I gave you so many chances. You wasted them all.
    1
  24.  @primus_fpv  You like assuming things, don't you.
    1
  25.  @primus_fpv  Compared to Koalitsia it's total trash. Are you even serious?
    1
  26.  @primus_fpv  That's the best you could think of? Laughable. Why is it so hard for people like you to admit they were wrong?
    1
  27.  @primus_fpv  Ok, explain how exactly is PZH 2000 superior to Koalitsia. You can't? I thought so, go back to the corner.
    1
  28.  @DoktorDoomJr  Of course they have a fairy tale for Krynky, it's supposedly a great shame for Russian army, because they coudn't secure their bank for such a long time. And yes, I really saw such spin being pushed.
    1
  29. Yes, Oryx is VERY trustworthy. smh
    1
  30.  @rick7424  It's like you didn't read a word of what I wrote. Incredible.
    1
  31.  @hermes7587  Sure, we all saw how well the western tanks burn, cope much harder.
    1
  32. You thonk? Yea, that checks out.
    1
  33.  @mastermariner490  Ukraine is not NATO member and those are not their stockpiles, Mykola.
    1
  34.  @gerritvalkering1068  Well, people who have been saying Ukraine is done are still correct. Ukraine is done all the time, everything they did just made things worse. They are just digging their hole deeper.
    1
  35. I'm amazed, that you actually try to inform about the conflict quite truthfully. So let me explain the thing about Kiiv. Have you seen any photos of it? How beautifull the city is? Now imagine it could end up like Mariupol thanks to the "total defence" strat, that the Ukrainian army uses. Which means they use towns full of people as a base of their military operations, to be clear. And Russians do NOT want to create another Mariupol, not from Kiiv, not from any other town.
    1
  36. Yea, the wet dreams of the empire of evil.
    1
  37. You can see in the comment there is quite a lot people eating it up and asking for more. Funny af.
    1
  38.  @nobodyherepal3292  It isn't? I must have dreamed it then, right?
    1
  39.  @nobodyherepal3292  Yes, you should.
    1
  40.  @nobodyherepal3292  So advancing into a giant fire pocket in enemy territory is somehow good for UA? lol
    1
  41.  @nobodyherepal3292  "Wait, did you just admit AFU is using civilians as human shield? That confirms other such reports, thanks. Tell how cute it is to the 50k+ banderites killed in Kursk." - Youtube is censoring my reaction.
    1
  42.  @sababugs1125  That is fire anomalies imagery. What exactly should I check there and how exactly do I extrapolate the numbers of shells used by one side? Or are you just joking? Because in that case - not funny.
    1
  43.  @sababugs1125  And?
    1
  44.  @jehandesains8674  The only sources I saw "admitting" such things were unsurprisingly pro-Ukrainian ones. And I don't see you presenting any sources at all. And if you think putting "soon to be extinct" text in thumbnail isn't coping, so be it. The only thing we can objectively conclude from the fact that Russia moved a certain number of vehicles from long term storage is exactly just the number of vehicles moved from long term storage. Everything else is just conjecture. That's how reality works, sorry to burst your bubble.
    1
  45.  @rick7424  That's obviously obvious. smh
    1
  46. Seems to be working? How exactly it seems to be working?
    1
  47.  @IrrationalCharm  You mean so right.
    1
  48. I did not see a single citation of this clown channel anywhere ever.
    1